Techniques Of Employee Selection And Recruitment Chapter 8 E

Techniques Of Employee Selection Recruitmentchapter 8 External Sel

Explain the advantages & disadvantages of hiring an external agency to conduct applicants’ background checks. How can HR justify the additional cost of using an external agency?

Explain the difference between Credit Checks & Criminal Checks. For which kind of positions are such checks most crucial?

Paper For Above instruction

The process of employee selection is a critical component of human resource management, aimed at identifying and hiring individuals who best fit the organizational needs and culture. One key aspect of this process involves conducting background checks to verify the credentials, experience, and integrity of potential employees. Organizations often face a choice between conducting these checks internally or outsourcing this task to external agencies. Each approach has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, and understanding these implications helps HR professionals justify the costs involved.

Advantages of Hiring an External Agency for Background Checks

Engaging a professional background screening agency offers several benefits. First, external agencies have specialized expertise and access to extensive databases that enable more thorough and accurate checks. They are well-versed in legal compliance, ensuring that screening processes adhere to regulations like the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) in the United States, thereby reducing legal risks for the organization. Additionally, outsourcing can save internal HR staff time, allowing them to focus on more strategic HR functions rather than administrative tasks.

An external agency also enhances credibility and objectivity. Since third-party checks are perceived as more impartial, the results are less likely to be biased or manipulated, increasing the reliability of the background verification process. These agencies often provide comprehensive reports that include criminal history, employment verification, credit history, and educational credentials, ensuring a holistic view of the candidate.

Disadvantages of Outsourcing Background Checks

However, outsourcing also involves drawbacks. The cost is a significant factor, as external services can be expensive, especially for organizations conducting multiple checks. There is also a risk of delays if the agency is overwhelmed or if communication between the employer and the service provider is inefficient. Moreover, organizations relinquish some control over the process, which might result in less tailored checks aligned specifically with organizational policies or values.

Justifying the Additional Costs

HR can justify the additional expenditure on external agencies through the long-term savings and strategic benefits gained. Accurate background checks reduce the risk of negligent hiring, which can lead to costly legal liabilities, reputational damage, and turnover costs. By preventing hiring of unsuitable candidates, organizations avoid expenses associated with mis-hires, such as training, productivity losses, and potential legal repercussions, which can far outweigh the costs of background screening.

Furthermore, rigorous verification contributes to a trust-based company culture and enhances organizational integrity. The investment in professional background checks can be viewed as a risk management measure, safeguarding the organization from hiring frauds or individuals with criminal backgrounds that could harm other employees or customers.

Difference Between Credit Checks and Criminal Checks

Credit and criminal checks serve different purposes in the screening process. A credit check involves reviewing an individual's financial history, such as their credit score, outstanding debts, repayment history, and bankruptcy records. These checks are particularly relevant for positions that involve financial responsibilities, access to sensitive financial information, or fiduciary duties, such as finance directors, auditors, or loan officers.

In contrast, criminal checks verify whether an individual has a criminal record, including convictions, arrests, or other legal issues. They are essential for positions that involve security, childcare, healthcare, and other roles where safety, trustworthiness, and integrity are paramount. For example, employees working in educational institutions, healthcare facilities, or roles with vulnerable populations typically require thorough criminal background checks to ensure public safety.

Conclusion

In summary, outsourcing background checks to external agencies presents a strategic choice with clear advantages in terms of expertise, objectivity, and efficiency, but also involves significant costs. Organizations justify these costs primarily through risk mitigation, legal compliance, and safeguarding their reputation. Understanding the distinction between credit and criminal checks helps HR professionals tailor screening processes to specific role requirements, thereby aligning hiring practices with organizational safety and financial integrity.

References

  • Cascio, W. F. (2015). Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Heneman, H., Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. (2014). Staffing Organizations (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin.
  • Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2020). Background Check Laws & Best Practices. SHRM.
  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (2021). Enforcement Guidance on Criminal Background Checks. EEOC.
  • Assetion, C. T. (2018). The legal aspects of employment screening. Journal of Business Law, 25(3), 35-50.
  • FCRA, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. (1970). Fair Credit Reporting Act, United States.
  • Van Der Heijden, H. (2017). The role of background screening in talent acquisition. HR Magazine, 62(9), 24-29.
  • National Conference of State Legislatures. (2011). Employment background checks laws. NCSL.org.
  • Reid, R., & Flowers, K. (2019). Effectiveness of background checks in preventing misconduct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 139-156.
  • Bamford, M., & Forrester, W. (2016). Ensuring legal compliance in employee screening processes. HR Legal Review, 12(4), 44-52.

Related Assignments