Template Of The Research Proposal – 200 Points In Tot 254455
Template Of The Research Proposal200 Points In Total Please Fill Out
Template of the Research Proposal (200 points in total. Please fill out the required section week by week. The instructions in italic fonts are here to help you to use this template and follow the report format. In week 8, when you polish the final report, please remove all the instructions to keep your final report coherent. Thanks.) ( Title : 5 points ; should be about the relationship between two variables, and at least one variable should be predominately in communication or related areas) : Introduction (15 points ; should be at least two paragraphs, at least 150 words for each paragraph; needs to address why this relationship about the two variables are worth exploration with at least five citations from academic journals. One missing citation will cause a three-point deduction) . Literature Review ( 30 points; with at least eight citations from academic journals and related to relationship or the variables under study. For the citations, the more relative the better; one or more citations from the introduction part can be used but the points from those citations should not be repetitions. Needs to discuss how researchers have known about the variables and their relationship so far so that your study will not repeat previous studies and “reinvent the wheel”. Three points deduction for each citation missing. This part should contain at least three paragraphs, two paragraphs about the findings of the two variables, and one paragraph about the findings of their relationship, with each paragraph containing at least 150 words. At the end clearly state your research hypothesis if you have enough confidence for your prediction of the relationship based on your review of previous studies or research question if you are still not sure about the relationship based on the literature reviewed.) RQ/H: (choose one and remove the other, and then state your RQ or H here) Methodology Research Procedure. (40 points). This is the section of the methodology part. Name your research method and discuss with at least three citations why this method is the best choice to answer your research question. Previous citations can be used but points should not be repetitions. This is where you tell me about the research project you are planning, in a step-by-step way. a. Research question or hypotheses b. Proposed methodology (Include citations about the method you will be using and how it has been used before in communications research). Make sure that your procedure fits the requirements about the research methods of your choice in the readings and that overall principles of “objective, systematic, and replicable.” c. Sampling frame d. Independent variables (quantitative only, include pre-existing scales, if appropriate) e. Dependent variables (quantitative only, include pre-existing scales, if appropriate) f. Timeline for data collection Measurement (50 points) ( there is no page limit here, since every method is different) With at least five citations, clearly define the meanings of the two variables under study and how specifically they will be measured in your study. One or more citations from the introduction and literature review parts can be used but the points from those citations should not be repetitions. You could just borrow the measurements used in the previous studies, or modify them for your own study with substantial argument to support the modification.) When proposing your draft of measures/instrument, including either of the following based on the methods you choose i. A codesheet/codebook for content analysis ii. An experimental protocol and stimulus materials for experiments iii. A draft of your survey if you’ve chosen a survey iv. An interview guide for focus groups or in-depth interviews Predicted results (15 points) Written in the future tense, you should give me some idea of the kind of information you believe you will have at the end of your study, and any results predicted by your own hypotheses, based on previous studies. Expanded references (15 points) All the research studies/journal articles that you use to build your research proposal should have full references available in the appendix section ( Finally, the revision, polishing, and final submission counts for 20 points . Revise each part of the mini research project accomplished in previous weeks based on feedback from the class and put them into the final version of your research report. Polishing and proofreading it to eliminate any errors and make the final report logically fluent, coherent, and focused. Each error causes a five-point deduction. Before the final submission, please make sure that you remove all instruction in italic.)
Paper For Above instruction
The process of developing a comprehensive research proposal begins with selecting a pertinent and compelling title that encapsulates the relationship between two variables, with at least one variable linked to communication or related areas. An illustrative example might be: "The Impact of Social Media Use on Interpersonal Communication Skills." This title provides a clear indication of the study's focus and scope, setting a foundation for the subsequent sections.
The introduction section should comprise at least two well-developed paragraphs, each containing a minimum of 150 words. It must articulate why exploring the relationship between the selected variables is valuable, contextualizing the importance of the study within existing scholarly discourse. Incorporate at least five citations from academic journals to substantiate claims about the significance of the variables and their potential interrelation. For example, prior research might indicate that social media influences interpersonal skills, but gaps remain regarding the mechanisms or the strength of this relationship. Highlighting these gaps underscores the need for further investigation.
The literature review must delve deeply into existing research concerning each variable independently and their relationship. It should contain at least eight scholarly references, emphasizing their relevance and how they contribute to understanding the variables. The review should be organized into three paragraphs: two discussing the findings related to each variable separately, and one synthesizing the findings on their relationship. Each paragraph should be at least 150 words. This structure avoids redundancy and ensures a comprehensive overview of current knowledge. Conclude this section with a clear research hypothesis or question, based on the literature, indicating the anticipated nature or uncertainty of the relationship under investigation.
In selecting the research question or hypothesis (RQ/H), choose one to focus your study. The RQ or H should be explicitly stated, and the other should be omitted. The methodology section should specify the research method—such as surveys, experiments, case studies, or content analysis—and justify its appropriateness with at least three scholarly citations. Describe your research process step-by-step: formulating hypotheses or questions, detailing the methodology, clarifying the sampling frame, and identifying independent and dependent variables, including their measurement scales. Provide a timeline for data collection, ensuring the process aligns with the chosen method. All these elements aim to produce data that is objective, systematic, and replicable.
The measurement section should define the operationalization of the variables, citing at least five references to justify measurement choices. Clarify how each variable will be quantified, citing pre-existing scales or devising new ones with appropriate justification. Include a draft instrument—such as a survey questionnaire, content analysis codebook, or interview guide—that clearly details how data will be gathered and assessed. For example, if measuring social media use, specify whether a standardized scale will be employed or if items will be adapted based on previous research.
Predicted results should be articulated in future tense, hypothesizing the nature of findings based on previous literature, such as "It is expected that higher social media use will correlate with lower interpersonal communication skills." This projection helps frame expectations and prepares for interpreting the eventual data.
Finally, all references cited throughout the proposal must be fully listed in an appendix, formatted according to academic standards (such as APA). This comprehensive reference list demonstrates scholarly rigor and provides sources for validation.
Throughout the process, students should revises, polishes, and proofreads each section to ensure clarity, coherence, and adherence to academic standards. All instructions should be removed in the final report to maintain professionalism and readability.