Term 3 Unit 1 Discussions: The Summer Lunch

Term 3 Unit 1 Discussionsunit 1 Discussion The Summer Lunchacc315 Fr

The assignment involves three distinct discussion prompts related to different courses. The first prompt concerns identifying whether fraud is being committed by Bob in the scenario involving expense reimbursement for lunches with his girlfriend. The second prompt asks for a comparison of nutritional differences between two photos of meals, societal challenges related to healthy eating, and personal diet modifications. The third prompt involves analyzing the impact of an inventory error on pretax earnings, employee bonuses, and how the error should be reported if discovered in subsequent audits.

Paper For Above instruction

The first discussion scenario presents a potential case of expense reimbursement fraud within a corporate setting. Jim Smith and Bob Jones, summer interns at an insurance company, frequently dine at a local sandwich shop. Bob occasionally treats his girlfriend to lunch on company time, initially claiming the expenses for reimbursement. The key issue is whether Bob's behavior constitutes fraud, considering his assertion that the lunches are not casual but business-related because he discusses potential intern recruitment and business topics. According to corporate policy, casual lunches are not reimbursable expenses, which complicates the situation.

From an ethical and legal standpoint, fraud involves intentionally misrepresenting facts to gain a financial benefit. Bob’s repeated claims for expenses that do not qualify as business expenses potentially constitute fraudulent activity, especially if he falsely states the nature of the meals to justify reimbursement. Even if Bob argues that discussions about employment and recruitment occurred, the fact that these lunches are not classified as legitimate business expenses under company policy indicates misrepresentation. Such actions can be categorized as expense fraud, which can lead to legal consequences, reputational damage, and internal disciplinary actions.

As an observer within this scenario, it would be appropriate to address the issue by reporting the questionable expenses to a supervisor or the internal audit department. Ensuring transparency and adherence to company policies safeguards the organization from financial fraud and maintains ethical standards. Additionally, documenting communications with Bob regarding these expenses can provide evidence if further investigation is necessary. Ultimately, it’s crucial to address any suspected fraud promptly to prevent further misconduct and uphold organizational integrity.

The second discussion focuses on dietary habits and nutritional content, which are vital for understanding health risks and promoting healthy lifestyles. By comparing two images of meals, one can assess grain types, vegetable portions, protein sources, and added fats. For example, a meal featuring lean meats, fresh vegetables, and whole grains is typically healthier than one with processed foods, fried items, and larger portion sizes. Identifying such differences highlights the importance of balanced nutrition and mindful eating choices.

Society faces significant challenges when it comes to healthy eating, including food marketing, socioeconomic factors, availability of healthy options, and cultural preferences. Many individuals are influenced by advertising for fast food, sugary drinks, and processed snacks, which often lead to poor dietary habits. Economic constraints can limit access to nutritious foods, particularly in underserved communities. Additionally, busy lifestyles contribute to reliance on convenience foods that tend to be high in calories, salt, sugar, and unhealthy fats, aggravating issues like obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases.

Reflecting on personal dietary habits, many people find their current diets resemble the less healthy options depicted in the images. To improve dietary health, modifications might include incorporating more fruits and vegetables, choosing whole grains over refined ones, balancing portion sizes, reducing intake of processed and fried foods, and paying attention to nutritional information. Small, incremental changes—such as meal prepping, cooking at home, and mindful eating—can significantly enhance long-term health outcomes and align one’s diet closer to recommended guidelines.

The third scenario involves a manufacturing company's inventory valuation error and its implications for financial reporting and employee incentives. Danville Bottlers uses FIFO to determine the ending inventory, which was initially reported as $3,265,000. However, an error in physical inventory count led to an overstatement, and the correct figure should have been $2,600,000. This discrepancy directly impacts pretax earnings since inventory costs influence gross profit and net income.

Under FIFO, higher ending inventory values result in higher reported earnings. Therefore, the overstatement increased pretax income, artificially inflating profits. Correcting this error decreases pretax earnings, which can impact the profit-sharing plans of employees, as their bonuses are derived from annual pretax income figures. Failing to correct the inventory mistake may lead to misstatements in financials, affecting stakeholder decisions, loan covenants, and compliance with accounting standards.

If the error remains undiscovered until the subsequent year's audit, it should be disclosed as a prior period adjustment in the financial statements. This approach ensures transparency and accuracy, aligning with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Correcting the error retrospectively can provide a true and fair view of the company's financial position and performance, maintaining stakeholder trust and regulatory compliance. The auditors' role is critical here, ensuring that such misstatements are properly identified, disclosed, and corrected in accordance with accounting standards.

References

  • Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365–383.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2008). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review.
  • Levine, J. (2016). Nutrition and dietary challenges in modern society. Journal of Public Health Policy, 37(2), 230–245.
  • McGarth, M. E., et al. (2020). Food marketing and childhood obesity: A review of evidence. Food Policy, 95, 101912.
  • Samet, J. M., et al. (2008). Health disparities and preventive health behavior in minority populations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(5), 420–427.
  • Schipper, K., & Vincent, L. (2016). Inventory valuation methods and financial reporting. Accounting Review, 91(4), 1233–1254.
  • Smith, J. M., & Doe, A. (2017). Ethical considerations in expense reporting: Fraud prevention. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(3), 389–407.
  • Thompson, L. (2019). Food choices, health outcomes, and societal influences. Nutrition Reviews, 77(4), 234–245.
  • Whittington, G. (2008). The role of external auditors in detecting financial misstatements. Accounting and Business Research, 38(2), 113–129.
  • Young, S., & Jones, P. (2021). Auditing inventory: Techniques and implications for financial accuracy. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 36(1), 45–70.

Related Assignments