Term 4 Week 5 Discussions Forum

Term 4 Week 5 Discussionsweek 5 Discussion Forummgt5430 Organizationa

Discuss the differences between functional and dysfunctional conflict. Why should a manager understand conflict? Identify and define the five core job dimensions and the three critical psychological states in the Job Characteristics Model.

Discuss how important social media is in today's world and what types of social media you would spend your marketing budget on and why.

Should Tom immediately withdraw from the engagement without discussing the foreign trust issue, try to convince Mary to report it, report the incident to the IRS, or continue to do consulting for the company? Discuss the ethical and legal considerations involved.

Is Sonya justified in refusing to prepare Carlito Alverez's tax return given his suspected illegal background? Should she accept the engagement, and what are the ethical implications?

Comment on the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed organizational structures, Structure A and Structure B, including their impact on span of control and employee behavior. Recommend a suitable organizational structure and discuss factors influencing the span of control decision.

Paper For Above instruction

In exploring organizational dynamics, understanding the nature of conflict within organizations is essential for effective management. Conflict can be categorized as either functional or dysfunctional, with the former contributing to organizational growth and innovation, and the latter hindering performance and morale (Rahim, 2017). Functional conflict promotes healthy debate and diverse perspectives, fostering problem-solving and creativity. Conversely, dysfunctional conflict often leads to hostility, decreased collaboration, and reduced productivity (De Dreu & Weingart, 2003). Managers must comprehend conflict to harness its positive aspects and mitigate detrimental effects, thereby enhancing organizational effectiveness (Thomas & Kilmann, 2008).

The Job Characteristics Model (JCM), developed by Hackman and Oldham (1976), outlines five core job dimensions: skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, and feedback. These dimensions influence three critical psychological states: experienced meaningfulness of work, experienced responsibility for outcomes, and knowledge of actual results. When these psychological states are positively impacted, they lead to higher motivation, job satisfaction, and performance (Hackman & Oldham, 1976). Precisely designing jobs around these dimensions can significantly improve employee engagement and productivity.

In today's digital age, social media plays a pivotal role in marketing strategies. Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn enable targeted advertising and direct engagement with consumers. Social media's interactive nature allows brands to build relationships, gather feedback, and foster community (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2010). Allocating marketing resources to platforms based on target demographics and content suitability is crucial. For instance, Instagram is ideal for visual storytelling aimed at younger audiences, while LinkedIn is better suited for B2B marketing. To maximize impact, marketing budgets should focus on platforms aligning with specific business objectives and audience preferences (Tuten & Solomon, 2017).

The ethical dilemma faced by Tom Anderson regarding the foreign trust raises significant concerns. If Tom suspects tax evasion or illegal activities, his immediate obligation is to uphold legal and ethical standards. Ethically, he should advise Mary to disclose the trust and income, emphasizing compliance with tax laws (Kleinman, 2019). Legally, he may be obliged to report the suspicious foreign trust to authorities such as the IRS, especially under programs aimed at combating offshore tax evasion (IRS, 2020). Withdrawing from the engagement without action could expose him to legal liability for aiding or implicitly covering up tax fraud. Continuing to assist with full transparency and informing relevant authorities aligns with professional ethical codes of conduct (AICPA, 2019).

Regarding Sonya Fuentez's situation with Carlito Alvarez, the decision hinges on ethical principles and legal compliance. Given Alvarez's suspected involvement in illicit activities, accepting to prepare his tax return entails significant ethical risks, including complicity in possibly facilitating illegal activities. According to the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, accountants should refuse or withdraw from engagements where there is a conflict with the law or ethical standards (AICPA, 2019). Sonya's obligation is to uphold integrity and avoid actions that could associate her with criminal conduct. Therefore, she should decline the engagement unless Alvarez provides full disclosure and commits to legal compliance, which appears unlikely in this scenario.

When evaluating organizational structures, it is important to balance efficiency, communication, and employee autonomy. Structure A, characterized by a traditional hierarchy, offers advantages such as clear authority lines, defined roles, and accountability, which facilitate coordination. However, disadvantages include potential rigidity and slower decision-making. The span of control in such a structure typically tends to be narrower, allowing managers to supervise effectively but possibly leading to higher overhead costs (Roberts, 2014).

Conversely, Structure B, a flatter organization, provides advantages like enhanced communication, quicker decision-making, and increased employee empowerment. Its disadvantages include potential role confusion, reduced control, and difficulty managing larger spans of control (Daft, 2015). The broader span of control in flat structures requires employees to be more autonomous and self-directed, affecting motivation and performance (Yukl, 2013).

Choosing an organizational structure depends on multiple factors, including company size, complexity of tasks, environment stability, and technological integration. A flexible approach may involve adopting a hybrid structure tailored to specific departmental needs, optimizing the benefits of both traditional and flat designs (Burns & Stalker, 1961). Ultimately, understanding the influence of structure on span of control and employee behavior guides managers in designing effective organizations that are adaptable and resilient.

References

  • AICPA. (2019). Code of Professional Conduct. American Institute of CPAs.
  • Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. Tavistock Publications.
  • Daft, R. L. (2015). Organization Theory and Design. Cengage Learning.
  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the World Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
  • Kleinman, G. (2019). Ethical Dilemmas in Tax Practice. Journal of Accounting & Finance, 19(3), 88-96.
  • Rahim, M. A. (2017). Managing Conflict in Organizations. Routledge.
  • Roberts, K. (2014). Organizational Theory (5th ed.). Pearson.
  • Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (2008). Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. XICOM.
  • Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson.

Related Assignments