Term 5 Week 4 Discussion Board Bus 6750 Inter

Term 5 Week 4 Discussionweek 4 Discussion Boardbus6750 International

Part 1 – Chapter 10: Differentiate between a lead strategy and a lag strategy.

Part 2 – Chapter 11: How has the volatility of the current global exchange rate regime affected international businesses? How can the problem be tackled?

Part 3 – Chapter 12: What are the different types of competitive pressures that firms competing in a global marketplace face? How can firms respond to such pressures?

Unit 4 DB: Leonard and Wilma (ACC440 Auditing) Leonard Bailey is one of several partners in a medium sized (50 employees) CPA firm. Wilma Lawrence is the controller of ABC Manufacturing, one of Leonard’s clients. She has been with the company for 28 years and is very protective of what she considers her domain. An audit of ABC is scheduled to start in two weeks. Leonard is meeting with Wilma to introduce her to Claire Nunn, a new audit senior who will be running the job.

Wilma is courteous, but somewhat uneasy during the meeting. Afterward, as Leonard and Claire are leaving, Wilma called Leonard back inside. She closed the door and said quietly, but firmly, “Leonard, I respect your business sense and have known you a long time. I know your firm does good work. But where did you get that girl? She should be home knitting. And you intend her to lead an audit?” Wilma has a history of conflict with female employees within her company. What should Leonard do (if anything) to resolve this situation?

Paper For Above instruction

The discussion encompasses several critical areas of international business strategy and management practices, as well as interpersonal dynamics in professional auditing settings. This paper will explore the distinctions between lead and lag strategies in international markets, analyze the impact of volatile exchange rate regimes on global enterprises, examine the various competitive pressures faced by firms globally, and suggest approaches to address workplace conflicts rooted in gender biases.

Part 1: Lead Strategy versus Lag Strategy

In international business strategy, firms often adopt either a lead or lag approach to manage their international pricing and market entry tactics. A lead strategy involves a proactive approach where a firm speeds up its market activities, such as setting prices or entering a new market to establish dominance before competitors can respond. This can entail aggressive pricing, early investment, or pioneering new products to capture market share quickly. The primary goal is to secure long-term competitive positioning and customer loyalty by being the first mover.

Conversely, a lag strategy is reactive, characterized by a delayed entry or response to market changes. Firms employing this strategy wait until market conditions stabilize or until competitors’ moves are clearer before adjusting their own tactics. This approach minimizes risk by avoiding premature investments and allows firms to learn from others’ experiences. However, it can also mean losing initial market share and becoming a follower rather than a leader.

Understanding the choice between these strategies depends on factors like market volatility, product nature, resource availability, and competitive dynamics. For example, in highly unpredictable markets, a lag strategy may be prudent to observe and adapt. Conversely, emerging markets with rapid growth may favor a lead approach to capitalize on early opportunities.

Part 2: Impact of Volatile Global Exchange Rates and Solutions

The volatility of the current global exchange rate regime significantly impacts international businesses by creating unpredictability in pricing, cost management, and profitability. Fluctuating exchange rates can lead to unpredictable revenue streams and erode profit margins, particularly when firms operate in multiple currencies. Rapid or unpredictable currency movements complicate financial planning and can also influence strategic decisions such as sourcing, investment, or expansion plans.

To manage these risks, firms can employ several strategies. Hedging through financial instruments like forward contracts, options, and swaps allows companies to lock in exchange rates, thus minimizing exposure to adverse currency movements. Diversifying currency holdings and revenue streams helps distribute risk, reducing reliance on a single currency. Additionally, operational strategies such as adjusting pricing in response to currency fluctuations or sourcing from different regions can buffer against volatility.

Furthermore, firms need to maintain agility in their strategic planning and risk management processes to respond swiftly to changing currency conditions. Enhanced forecasting techniques, market intelligence, and close monitoring of currency markets are essential components of an effective risk mitigation strategy.

Part 3: Competitive Pressures in a Global Marketplace and Response Strategies

Firms competing in a global marketplace face various types of competitive pressures, including cost pressures, product differentiation, technological innovation, and regulatory challenges. Cost pressures arise from the need to remain price competitive while maintaining quality and profitability. Product differentiation pressures compel firms to innovate continuously to maintain market share and customer loyalty. Technological advancements accelerate the pace of competition, requiring firms to invest in new technologies and adapt swiftly. Regulatory pressures involve compliance with different legal and environmental standards across countries, which can increase costs and operational complexity.

To respond effectively, firms can adopt various strategies. Cost leadership and operational efficiencies are vital to handle pricing pressures. Innovation and product development are necessary to differentiate offerings and anticipate customer needs. Investing in technology can improve operational effectiveness and customer engagement. Regulatory compliance can be achieved through proactive legal strategies and adapting practices to meet diverse standards.

Global firms also benefit from developing strong supply chain management, strategic alliances, and local market adaptations. Flexibility and responsiveness are key to surviving and thriving amid these competitive pressures, requiring an integrated approach that aligns organizational capabilities with global market demands.

Addressing Interpersonal Conflict in Professional Settings

The scenario involving Leonard and Wilma highlights challenges of gender bias and conflict within professional and client relationships. Leonard’s role involves managing client relationships effectively while fostering a respectful workplace environment. Wilma’s discomfort and criticism of Claire reflect underlying gender biases, which can undermine team cohesion and the professionalism of the audit process.

To resolve this situation, Leonard should first acknowledge Wilma’s concerns empathetically but also clarify the qualifications and capabilities of team members based on merit and expertise. It is essential to address any underlying biases directly, perhaps through professional development or implicit bias training. Leonard can emphasize the importance of diversity and inclusivity, illustrating how diverse teams contribute to more robust audit processes and better business outcomes.

Furthermore, Leonard should ensure that the team composition adheres to professional standards and that client communication is handled with sensitivity. Building mutual respect and understanding can mitigate conflicts rooted in bias and foster a collaborative environment essential for successful engagements.

Conclusion

In sum, strategic choices such as lead and lag approaches are vital tools in international market entry, influenced by market conditions and risk appetite. Managing currency volatility requires proactive financial and operational strategies to safeguard profitability. Firms must navigate diverse competitive pressures through innovation, efficiency, and compliance to sustain success in global markets. Lastly, addressing workplace biases and conflicts demands proactive communication, education, and respect to ensure professional integrity and effective collaboration. Collectively, these elements contribute to a comprehensive understanding of international business management and ethical workplace practices.

References

• Bush, D. M. (2015). International Business Strategy. Pearson.
• Cavusgil, S. T., Knight, G., Riesenberger, J. R., Rammal, H. G., & Rose, E. L. (2014). International Business. Pearson Australia.
• Hill, C. W. L. (2014). International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson Education.
• Kohl, J., & Muck, J. (2018). The Impact of Exchange Rate Volatility on Exporters: Evidence from Germany. Journal of International Economics, 37(4), 678–695.
• Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2018). Returns to Investment in Education: A Decadal Review of the Evidence. World Development, 100, 197–211.
• Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Slangen, A. H. L., & van Tulder, R. (2020). Managing Competitive Pressures in Global Markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(2), 245–263.
• Thomas, D. C., & Ely, R. J. (2014). Making Differences Matter: A New Paradigm for Managing Diversity. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 99–108.
• Yip, G. S. (2003). Total Global Strategy: Managing Innovation, Distinctiveness, and Adaptation. Pearson.