Thank You For Revising And Resubmitting This Assignment I En

Thank You For Revising And Resubmitting This Assignment I Encourage Y

Thank you for revising and resubmitting this assignment. I encourage you to review the previous feedback in detail and review the assignment instructions. As previously mentioned, you need to submit 3 statements in the area of compensation; 3 statements in the area of benefits and 3 statements in the area of work-life. You provided Likert 3 questions total for employees and 3 Likert questions total for leaders. Again, 3 statements in each key area need to be provided.Additionally, these should not be questions. Per the assignment instructions, these need to be statements. I recommend that you add to your current questions in each key area and then turn the current questions into relevant statements. Respondents can then provide their level of agreeableness with each statement. When giving consideration to the open-ended questions, you never want someone to simply be able to answer "yes" or "no." You want to yield a descriptive response.Lastly, as previously discussed, research design was not sufficiently addressed. This feedback remains the same. I appreciate that you made improvements to the section that discussed how the information gathered can be used to revise the total rewards package and support the organizational strategic initiatives in alignment with the mission and vision. Your score in that section has improved. Your overall score on this assignment has improved from a 1 to a 2.There is still information lacking in the Likert and open-ended questions sections for both employees and leadership. Score 2: Crafted three weak employee statements in each of the following areas: compensation, benefits, and work-life for Likert-type responses. Please review the assignment requirements and associated live lecture recordings. You have uneven numbers of statements or questions in each section. Remember that the Likert scale responses should be statements, not questions.Please provide 3 statements in the area of compensation. 3 statements in the area of benefits and 3 statements in the area of work-life. Score 2: Crafted three weak open-ended employee questions, one from each area of compensation, benefits, and work-life. Please review the assignment requirements and associated live lecture recordings. For example, you asked "do you feel that the incentives do play any role in motivating the employees to work even harder." This could simply be answered "yes" or "no" and does not meet the criteria for a solid open-ended question. Please review the information that was provided regarding these types of questions.Score 2: Crafted three weak leadership statements in each of the following areas: compensation, benefits, and work-life Likert-type responses. One of the questions provided is not a Likert statement. I am specifically referring to question #3 under compensation. The other questions in the benefits and work-life sections were not Likert statements either.Score 2: Crafted three weak open-ended leadership questions specifically asking how the total rewards system supports the organization's mission, vision, and overall strategy. Please review the assignment instructions. You were asked to provide open-ended questions for the leadership team associated with the outlined sections and how the information supports the mission, vision and overall strategy. Remember that these questions should yield open feedback and not cause the respondent to simply reply "yes" or "no".Score 3: Provided rationale behind the choice and design of the questionnaire items, clear example provided. You did a good job in this section, but there was not a solid discussion of research design. Please review the lecture information where this was discussed on at least 2 separate occasions. Remember that research design is associated with the differences between the Likert and open-ended questionnaires and also the differences between asking employees a set of questions and then asking leaders another set of questions. Please give consideration to why your questionnaires were structured this way.Additionally, you did not mention the differences between qualitative and quantitative data. Remember that Likert responses provide a quantitative value so that you can gauge the degree or level of agreeableness with the statement provided. Qualitative data is typically associated with open-ended questions where you can obtain a perspective from the respondents in their own words and identify common themes in the responses, even if the respondents all answer the questions differently. When research design is discussed, qualitative and quantitative elements should be discussed. Please provide more detail and relevant research in this section.Score 4: Strongly described how the results gathered from the questionnaires could be used to revise a total rewards system that is aligned with the organization's mission, vision, and overall strategy using thorough example(s) in a well-crafted summary. I appreciate that you improved upon this information and demonstrated an alignment with the mission, vision and overall strategy of the organization.Score 4: Used and relied on all credible sources in a well-crafted questionnaire and summary. Thank you for including research, incorporating in-text citations and an APA formatted reference page. Please include more robust graduate level research going forward.