The Angelino Family Has Five Children ✓ Solved

The Angelino Familythe Angelino Family Has Five Children And A Sixth I

The assignment requires analyzing two families—the Angelino family and the McNeil family—using the family systems framework. The analysis should predict each family's preferences, strengths, needs in terms of characteristics, interaction, function, and life cycle. Additionally, it involves characterizing each family's cultural values and examining how these values influence their perceptions of appropriate self-determination for parents and children, including those with severe disabilities. Finally, the assignment asks for two culturally responsive strategies for working with each family to address self-determination, considering their views and values.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The analysis of the Angelino and McNeil families through the family systems framework offers intriguing insights into their dynamics, values, and approaches to self-determination. Each family’s unique characteristics influence their functioning, interactions, and support needs, particularly when addressing complex situations such as severe disabilities among children. Understanding these aspects is essential for fostering effective, respectful, and culturally sensitive interventions.

Family Systems Framework Analysis: The Angelino Family

The Angelino family exemplifies a traditional, close-knit, and hierarchical family structure rooted in cultural values emphasizing familial loyalty and gender roles. Their characteristics reflect a large, extended family unit that values family cohesion and intergenerational support, evident in daily visits and shared responsibilities. The family's interaction patterns emphasize obedience, respect for authority, and collective participation in family rituals, notably during meals and caregiving routines. Functionally, they operate within a patriarchal framework, with the father, Mr. Angelino, exercising authority, especially over rules about social activities like dating and curfews. Their life cycle reflects a multigenerational household adapting to new members, including a pregnancy that signifies ongoing continuity and responsibility to future generations.

The family's strengths include their strong bonds, community involvement, and resilience in maintaining cultural traditions amid urban settings. Their needs center around balancing traditional values with individual development, especially as their children approach adolescence and seek greater autonomy. Their collectivist orientation provides emotional security but may pose challenges if individual preferences, like the daughter’s desire to date, conflict with cultural expectations.

Family Systems Framework Analysis: The McNeil Family

The McNeil family exhibits a modern, egalitarian, and achievement-oriented dynamic. Characterized by educational and professional success, they value individual ambition, career support, and personal independence. Their interaction patterns are flexible, with shared responsibilities like cooking and cleaning, and open communication, especially with extended family through phone calls and conferences. The family’s function emphasizes mutual support for personal growth and professional aspirations, providing a balanced environment conducive to pursuing individual interests and aspirations. Their life cycle involves navigating impending parenthood while maintaining strong connections with both sets of parents, showcasing a dual-cultural influence that emphasizes independence but also family closeness.

Their strengths include a commitment to personal and professional development, mutual respect, and deliberate boundaries that support their autonomy. Their needs involve establishing boundaries with their parents to maintain independence and building a support system tailored to their evolving family role. Their values foster a sense of self-determination rooted in individual achievement and balancing familial obligations with personal goals.

Cultural Values and Their Influence on Self-Determination

The Angelino family's cultural values are rooted in traditional Italian-American customs emphasizing familial loyalty, respect for authority, and collective well-being. These values translate into a more directive approach to child-rearing, where obedience and adherence to family rules are prized, especially in matters related to dating, curfews, and decision-making. Their view of self-determination is likely hierarchical, with parents making significant decisions for their children, including children with disabilities, emphasizing protection and guidance over independence. Respect for elders and adherence to cultural norms shape their perceptions of appropriate autonomy, especially considering their religious and cultural context.

In contrast, the McNeil family's values embrace individual achievement, independence, and personal self-expression. Their progressive outlook fosters a more collaborative approach to family decisions, where children and parents are encouraged to develop self-determination gradually. They likely support the idea that children, including those with disabilities, should participate in decision-making to the extent that they are able, emphasizing self-respect and empowerment. Their values promote the inclusion of children with disabilities in family life, advocating for accommodations that enable independence and active participation.

Strategies for Addressing Self-Determination in a Culturally Responsive Framework

The Angelino Family

  1. Engage in culturally sensitive dialogue to explore the importance of balancing respect for family traditions with fostering autonomy in children. For example, working collaboratively to gradually introduce age-appropriate decision-making opportunities can honor their values while supporting growth.
  2. Utilize family-centered interventions that reinforce the value of collective decision-making, such as involving extended family members in planning activities or choices related to children with disabilities. This respects their emphasis on family cohesion and hierarchies, ensuring interventions align with their cultural norms.

The McNeil Family

  1. Promote shared decision-making models that empower both parents and children, including children with disabilities, recognizing their capacity for self-determination and respecting their individual goals and preferences.
  2. Support the development of community-based networks and peer support groups that reinforce the family's values of independence and achievement, facilitating access to resources that strengthen their capacity to support their child's autonomy.

Conclusion

The distinct family dynamics, cultural values, and approaches to self-determination of the Angelino and McNeil families highlight the importance of culturally responsive practice in supporting family strengths and needs. Tailoring interventions to respect their values and interaction patterns enhances effectiveness and promotes respectful, empowering engagement with each family unit.

References

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books.
  • McGoldrick, M., Gerson, R., & Petry, S. (2008). Genograms: Assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Harvard University Press.
  • Carey, M. (2013). Cultural competency and family engagement. The Family Journal, 21(4), 372-378.
  • Fiese, B. H., & Spagnola, M. (2007). The family rhythm screw: How families build resilience through routines and rituals. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2007(118), 1–17.
  • Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (5th ed.). Pearson.
  • Hoffnung, R. (2012). Rethinking family therapy: Addressing gender, culture, and diversity. Routledge.
  • Hover-Kramer, M., & Kahne, S. (2014). Family resilience and cultural values. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(3), 318–324.
  • Sheppard, C., & Gilmour, J. (2014). Cultural competence in social work practice. Routledge.
  • Walters, T., & Angell, T. (2017). Family-centered services and cultural competence. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(2), 251-263.

Related Assignments