The Article Making It Happen Provides An Overview Of The HIM
The Article Making It Happen Provides An Overview Of The Himss Davie
The article "Making IT Happen" provides an overview of the HIMSS Davies Award requirements and strategies for implementing the EMR/EHR. The previous award recipients and the documentation on how to apply for an award is located at: There are two documents from the Davies award website that describe the requirements and how to apply for a Davies Award. Look at an EHR, such as Practice Fusion, or other EHR you have access to, and review the documents describing what is required to apply for a Davies Award. Write a 3-5 page paper describing how you would implement your chosen system at a healthcare facility in a manner that would meet the requirements to apply for a Davies award. You do not need to address every item listed in the attached document but focus on what you think will be the most important to achieve the required levels of adoption.
Discuss the benefits you want to achieve in your implementation and how you would ensure that they are met. Are there metrics you would use? Measurements you would make before and after the implementation? Reports you would produce? How would you conduct your workflow assessment?
How would that help you meet your goals? These are some example questions to get you started. You may include screen prints from the system you are implementing if applicable to your discussion of your implementation process.
Paper For Above instruction
Implementing an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system to meet the HIMSS Davies Award criteria requires a strategic approach that emphasizes not only the technical deployment but also the transformation of clinical workflows, enhancement of patient care, and achievement of meaningful use standards. This paper discusses how to implement an EHR system, such as Practice Fusion, at a healthcare facility in a manner aligned with the HIMSS Davies Award requirements, focusing on key strategies, benefits, metrics, workflow assessments, and reporting processes.
Introduction
The HIMSS Davies Award recognizes healthcare organizations that demonstrate a high level of achievement in advanced EHR use and meaningful use criteria. Achieving this award involves demonstrating improvements in patient care, safety, and operational efficiency through effective EHR implementation. To meet these standards, healthcare facilities need a comprehensive plan that covers technical deployment, workflow optimization, staff training, and continuous quality improvement (HIMSS, 2020). My approach to implementing Practice Fusion, or a similar EHR system, involves prioritizing these aspects to foster meaningful adoption and sustainment.
Planning and Needs Assessment
Successful implementation begins with a thorough needs assessment and stakeholder engagement. Key stakeholders, including clinicians, nurses, administrators, and IT personnel, should collaborate to identify workflow inefficiencies, clinical goals, and measurable objectives aligned with the HIMSS criteria (Buntin et al., 2010). Conducting workflow assessments before EHR deployment provides baseline data for measuring improvements.
Implementation Strategies
The core of the implementation involves configuring the EHR system to fit the clinical workflows rather than forcing workflows to fit the system. Practice Fusion’s customizable modules allow tailoring of documentation templates, order sets, and alerts to fit the specific needs of the facility (Chaudhry et al., 2006). Training staff extensively on the system's functionalities, emphasizing user engagement, and providing ongoing support are critical for adoption (Blavin et al., 2019).
Benefits of EHR Implementation
Implementing an EHR can lead to multiple benefits, including improved clinical documentation, enhanced patient safety, streamlined workflows, and better data for decision-making. For instance, electronic prescribing reduces medication errors, and real-time data access improves care coordination (Garg et al., 2005). Additionally, with high-quality data, healthcare providers can track outcomes more precisely, supporting quality improvement initiatives.
Measuring Success
Establishing metrics is vital to evaluate the impact of the EHR implementation. Metrics should include documentation completeness, order accuracy, medication error rates, patient wait times, and patient satisfaction scores (HIMSS, 2020). Measurements should be taken before implementation to establish baselines and after implementation to assess improvements. Data collection methods include chart audits, system-generated reports, and patient surveys.
Workflow Assessment
Workflow assessments should be conducted at multiple stages—pre-implementation, immediately post-implementation, and during ongoing use. Techniques such as process mapping, direct observation, and staff interviews help identify bottlenecks, redundancies, and areas for improvement (Sittig & Singh, 2010). Regular review cycles ensure the system adapts to changing needs and maximizes benefits.
Reporting and Quality Improvement
EHR systems like Practice Fusion generate comprehensive reports that support quality initiatives and compliance monitoring. These reports can track adherence to clinical guidelines, medication reconciliation, and preventive care measures (Kellermann & Jones, 2013). Regular review of reports supports continuous quality improvement and demonstrates progress towards the HIMSS Davies Award criteria.
Conclusion
Implementing an EHR system to meet HIMSS Davies Award standards involves strategic planning focused on stakeholder engagement, tailored workflows, staff training, and ongoing evaluation. The benefits include enhanced patient safety, operational efficiency, and data-driven decision-making. Metrics, workflow assessments, and reports are integral to measuring success and sustaining improvements. By following these principles, healthcare facilities can achieve meaningful use of EHRs, ultimately leading to recognition through awards like the HIMSS Davies.
References
Blavin, F., Kesselheim, A. S., & Kesselheim, A. S. (2019). Barriers to and facilitators of electronic health record adoption. JAMA, 322(12), 1167–1168.
Buntin, M. B., Burke, M. F., Hoaglin, M. C., & Blumenthal, D. (2010). The benefits of health information technology: A review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Affairs, 29(2), 404-411.
Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Wu, S., et al. (2006). Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144(10), 742-752.
Garg, A. K., Adhikari, N. K., McDonald, H., et al. (2005). Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on provider performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. JAMA, 293(10), 1223–1238.
HIMSS. (2020). HIMSS Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAM). Retrieved from https://www.himss.org
Kellermann, A. L., & Jones, S. S. (2013). What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology. Health Affairs, 32(1), 63-68.
Sittig, D. F., & Singh, H. (2010). A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 19(Suppl 3), i68-i74.