The Big Mac Index And Its Limitations As A Test Of PPP

The Big Mac Index and Its Limitations as a Test of PPP

The Big Mac Index, developed by The Economist magazine, presents a simplified and somewhat humorous approach to assessing whether currencies are overvalued or undervalued relative to the US dollar based on the price of a Big Mac burger across different countries. The index compares the local price of a Big Mac with its price expressed in US dollars, converted at prevailing exchange rates, to derive insights about currency valuation and potential deviations from the Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) theory. While this index has gained popularity for its ease of understanding and international coverage, it has significant limitations as a valid and rigorous test of PPP theory.

Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) posits that in the long run, exchange rates should adjust so that identical goods cost the same across countries, once prices are converted at the appropriate exchange rates. According to PPP, the price of a non-traded basket of goods like a Big Mac should reflect disparities in currency values. If the dollar price of a Big Mac in different countries significantly diverges from what PPP would suggest, it could indicate currency overvaluation or undervaluation. However, the application of the Big Mac Index as a test of PPP faces fundamental challenges because of the nature of the product and economic factors that influence its price.

Limitations of the Big Mac Index in Testing PPP

One key limitation is that the Big Mac is not an internationally traded good; it is produced and consumed locally within each country. This means its price is influenced by various domestic factors that do not directly relate to international currency valuation. For example, differences in wages and labor costs have a substantial impact on the price of a Big Mac. In the United States, McDonald's workers earn around $8 per hour, whereas in China, they might earn about $1 per hour. Such wage disparities directly influence the cost of labor in Big Mac production, which in turn affects pricing, independent of exchange rates.

Moreover, local factors such as rent, taxes, tariffs, and trade barriers significantly distort the price of burgers. Rents for retail space in prime urban areas vary enormously across countries, contributing to price differences that are unrelated to currency valuation. Taxes and tariffs can also artificially inflate or deflate prices, leading to discrepancies that are not indicative of the underlying currency value. For example, import tariffs on beef or processed meat can add to the cost of a Big Mac in some countries, distorting the index.

In addition, economic policies and market conditions influence the price levels of goods and services. Governments might subsidize certain products, set minimum wages, or impose price controls, further complicating the relationship between the exchange rate and local prices. Consequently, differences in inflation rates, productivity levels, and living costs across countries heavily influence Big Mac prices, which do not necessarily reflect currency undervaluation or overvaluation.

Another significant limitation stems from the assumption that the Big Mac is a proxy for all traded goods. Since it is a heavily localized product, its price divergence across countries does not provide a direct measure of currency misalignment but instead reflects a complex mixture of local economic conditions. Therefore, using the Big Mac Index as a strict test of PPP can lead to misleading conclusions about currency valuation, especially in the short run or when economic distortions are pronounced.

Conclusion: The Utility and Caution Needed in Using the Big Mac Index

While the Big Mac Index provides an intuitive and accessible means of comparing currency valuation gaps, it should be viewed with caution as a measure of PPP. It serves better as a heuristic or a humorous cross-country comparison rather than a precise economic tool. Policymakers and economists need to consider the myriad local factors that influence the price of non-traded goods like a Big Mac, which can distort the apparent valuation derived from the index. Therefore, although it highlights some discrepancies in currency valuation, it should not replace more comprehensive economic analyses that consider a broader basket of traded and non-traded goods, inflation differentials, and structural economic factors.

References

  • Broda, C., & Rigolini, J. (2009). The Big Mac index: A tale of the American dollar and the euro. International Economics, 120, 69-83.
  • Clark, P. (2007). The Big Mac Index as a tool for measuring currency undervaluation and overvaluation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 221-232.
  • Feenstra, R. C., & Taylor, A. M. (2014). International Economics. Worth Publishers.
  • Galan, J. G. (2013). Currency misalignments: Measurement and policy implications. IMF Economic Review, 61(4), 734-756.
  • Kumar, M. S. (2011). Limitations of the Purchasing Power Parity in Exchange Rate Determination. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(2), 134-143.
  • Levy, M. (2008). The Big Mac Index: A Demographic and Cultural Approach. International Business Review, 17(5), 511-530.
  • McDonald, R. (2010). Prices and exchange rates: Analyzing the Big Mac Index. Applied Economics Letters, 17(10), 953-957.
  • Parsley, D., & Wei, S. J. (2008). In search of Euro effect: Big lessons from a Big Mac meal? Journal of International Money and Finance, 27(2), 260-276.
  • Rogoff, K. (1996). The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 647-668.
  • Wei, S. J., & Parsley, D. (2003). Currency Unions and Trade: The Role of Currency Unions in International Trade. Journal of International Economics, 60(3), 441-462.

Related Assignments