The Casesmart Airport Passenger Processing System Sapps Will

The Casesmart Airport Passenger Processing System Sapps Will Replac

The Casesmart Airport Passenger Processing System (SAPPS) will replace human-administered ID control, airport check-in, and boarding-pass processes at the new airport. The system aims to provide faster processing times and enhanced security, with passengers walking through a passage surrounded by cameras, microphones, and remote readers to complete ID verification, check-in, and boarding-pass processing simultaneously without interaction with airport officers. The project involves logical decomposition of tasks, design and construction phases, procurement, installation, testing, training, and final delivery, all within specific time constraints and dependencies.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The implementation of the Smart Airport Passenger Processing System (SAPPS) at a new airport is a complex project that encompasses multiple phases, dependencies, and logistical considerations. Its primary goal is to automate and accelerate passenger processing while maintaining or enhancing security measures. This paper delineates the project scope, develops an activity-based project schedule employing Activity on Node (AON) analysis, and illustrates a Gantt chart to visualize the project's timeline and task relationships.

Scope Statement

The scope of this project includes the planning, design, procurement, construction/renovation, installation, testing, staff training, and delivery phases necessary to implement the SAPPS at the new airport terminal. Specifically, the project involves determining integration methods into the existing airport infrastructure, designing and installing the required IT system components (cameras, fingerprint and RFID readers, database servers), renovating or constructing the terminal to accommodate the new systems, procuring hardware and software from selected vendors, installing and testing the system, training staff in both classroom and practical settings, and finally delivering the operational system to the manager for project closure. Constraints include strict adherence to warehouse storage deadlines, completion of construction before system installation, and completing training only after successful testing. The project excludes ongoing maintenance and post-implementation support, which are outside the scope of initial delivery.

Project Schedule Development Using Activity Analysis (AON)

To structure the project schedule, each task is represented as an activity with logical dependencies, durations, and constraints:

1. Decision on Integration Method (1 week) – The starting point, determining how to integrate SAPPS.

2. Design of IT System (3 weeks) – Follows the decision on integration; includes design of cameras, readers, and database.

3. Construction/Renovation of Terminal (variable, ongoing until complete) – Cannot start before the integration method is decided.

4. Procurement of Hardware and Software (1 week) – Ordering from vendors; triggered after system design.

5. Equipment Arrival at Warehouse (3 weeks) – Dependent on procurement; must arrive before installation.

6. Terminal Construction/Renovation Completion (must be completed before installation) – Critical dependency.

7. System Installation (1 week) – Can only start after terminal construction is finished.

8. System Testing (1 week) – Must follow installation; tests verify system operability.

9. Staff Training (initial classroom training + practical training) – Starts after system design, continues post-testing.

10. System Delivery to Manager & Project Closure (1 week) – Final step after training completion.

Using AON analysis, these activities are connected based on dependencies, with the critical path including activities that determine the project's minimum completion time.

Gantt Chart Development

The Gantt chart visualizes these activities over the project timeline, illustrating overlaps and dependencies. The key phases are sequential, with some tasks (e.g., staff training and testing) occurring in parallel. The chart begins with the decision-making phase, followed by system design, procurement, construction, installation, testing, training, and final delivery. The timeline accounts for the 1-week window to receive equipment (after 3 weeks of procurement) and ensures construction is completed before installation.

Due to limitations in text format, a detailed Gantt chart can be created using project management software like Microsoft Project or online tools such as Smartsheet or TeamGantt. These tools allow users to input activities with durations and dependencies to generate a visual timeline, making project monitoring and adjustments more manageable.

Conclusion

Successful implementation of SAPPS requires meticulous planning, clear scope definition, and precise scheduling. By employing activity analysis with AON and visualizing timelines through a Gantt chart, project managers can identify critical dependencies, allocate resources efficiently, and ensure timely delivery. The outlined approach facilitates an understanding of project flow, potential bottlenecks, and critical milestones necessary for seamless airport operation enhancement.

References

  1. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
  2. PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Project Management Institute.
  3. Heldman, K. (2018). Project Management JumpStart. Wiley.
  4. Zwikael, O., & Smyrk, J. (2011). Project Planning: A Practical Guide. Springer.
  5. Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2018). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
  6. Marshall, S., & Searle, R. (2019). Visual Project Planning Methods. Routledge.
  7. Fleming, Q. W., & Koppelman, J. M. (2016). Earned Value Project Management. Project Management Institute.
  8. Chapman, C. (2011). Project Management: Cross-Functional Delivery for Competitive Advantage. Wiley.
  9. Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2014). Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley.
  10. Kerzner, H. (2013). Advanced Project Management: Best Practices on Implementation. Wiley.

Related Assignments