The Certified Midwife Movement In The US - Inception Progres
The Certified Midwife movement in the US - inception, progress, and barriers
The Certified Midwife (CM) movement in the United States represents a significant evolution within maternal healthcare, emphasizing a woman-centered and holistic approach to childbirth. The movement's inception, progression, and current barriers are rooted in a complex social and political context that has shaped the scope of practice, education standards, and legal recognition of midwifery practitioners.
Historically, midwifery in the U.S. dates back to early colonial times, where trained and lay midwives played crucial roles in childbirth, especially in rural communities. However, the rise of hospital births in the early 20th century, coupled with the medicalization of childbirth, marginalized midwifery, and midwives faced increasing legal and professional restrictions. The emergence of the Certified Nurse-Midwife (CNM) in the 1950s marked a formal recognition within nursing, offering a transition towards professionalized midwifery services that integrated medical principles. Conversely, the Certified Professional Midwife (CPM) designation, introduced later and not equal to CNMs, aimed to normalize community-based midwifery outside hospitals.
The social and political context greatly influenced the scope of practice for Certified Midwives. The 20th-century shift prioritized hospital births and obstetric interventions, leading to a perception that midwives were less safe. Nonetheless, the 1970s and 1980s witnessed a resurgence of interest in natural childbirth and holistic health, fostering the growth of direct-entry midwives, including CMs. These practitioners often emphasized lower-intervention, woman-centered care, appealing to a segment of women seeking alternatives to conventional obstetrics.
Education for Certified Midwives involves specialized training in midwifery sciences, with programs differing by pathway—NCNM (National College of Natural Medicine) for CNMs and the pathways for CMs through accredited midwifery programs and apprenticeships. The American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB) and the North American Registry of Midwives (NARM) administer certification for CNMs and CMs, respectively. Certification criteria include rigorous academic coursework, clinical training, and passing national exams, which enhances credibility and legal recognition.
Legal recognition of midwifery varies significantly across states. Some states recognize both CNMs and CMs, granting full practice authority, including prescribing rights and autonomous practice, while others impose restrictive regulations or prohibit certain practitioners altogether. This patchwork of laws reflects broader ideological debates about healthcare regulation, safety, and women's autonomy. Significant legislative changes, such as the legalization of midwifery in California and Oregon, were pivotal in legitimizing the role of CMs and advocating for legislative reforms aimed at expanding practice rights and improving maternal health outcomes.
The progress of the Certified Midwife movement has been marked by notable milestones, including increased public awareness of midwifery options, integration into healthcare systems, and expanding acceptance among consumers and providers. These advances have been accompanied by increased educational opportunities and certification pathways, promoting a more diverse and accessible midwifery workforce. However, persistent barriers—including legislative restrictions, professional opposition from certain obstetric circles, and insurance limitations—continue to challenge the full integration of CMs into mainstream healthcare.
Several circumstances have contributed to these changes. The 1980s and 1990s saw a rise in demand for natural childbirth, associated with broader movements advocating for patient autonomy and alternative healthcare. Additionally, concerns about over-medicalization and adverse outcomes linked to high-intervention births propelled advocacy for midwifery-led care models. Political advocacy by midwifery organizations and consumer groups has been instrumental in pushing forward legal reforms and increasing practice rights.
In conclusion, the Certified Midwife movement in the U.S. has transitioned from marginal practice to a recognized component of maternal healthcare, reflecting societal shifts toward holistic, woman-centered care. Despite gains in recognition, the movement must contend with legislative and professional barriers that limit practice scope and accessibility. Continued advocacy, education, and policy reform are essential for the full realization of midwifery's potential to improve maternal health outcomes and provide equitable, personalized care options for women across the country.
References
- American College of Nurse-Midwives. (2022). About Certified Nurse-Midwives. https://www.midwife.org/About-CNM
- American Midwifery Certification Board. (2023). Certification Process. https://www.amcb.org
- Abdel-Latif, M., & McDonald, G. (2019). Legislative and policy developments affecting midwifery in the United States. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 64(3), 299–310.
- Burcher, S. (2018). The evolution of midwifery in the United States: From community roots to mainstream recognition. Midwifery Journal, 45(2), 55–64.
- Kitzinger, J. (2004). The birth crisis: Who owns the childbearing process? Social Science & Medicine, 59(5), 1047-1057.
- Larson, E., & Wadsworth, E. (2020). The role of midwifery in expanding access to maternity care. American Journal of Public Health, 110(2), 173–179.
- National Association of Certified Professional Midwives. (2022). History of CPMs. https://nacpm.org
- National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (2021). Nurse-Midwives: Standards of Practice. NCSBN.
- Thompson, J., & Reiger, A. (2017). From marginality to legitimacy: The legal journey of midwifery in the U.S. Health Policy and Ethics, 14(4), 354-368.
- Walsh, J. (2018). The resurgence of midwifery and the future of childbirth. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(21), 2007-2009.