The Chi-Squared Test Has Been Used Earlier To Test A Hypothe

The Chi Squared Test Has Been Used Earlier To Test A Hypothesis About

The Chi-squared test has been used earlier to test a hypothesis about a population variance. It is also a hypothesis testing procedure for when one or more variables in the research are categorical (nominal). During this week, we are covering the following two such Chi-squared tests: Chi-squared Goodness of Fit Test and Chi-squared Test for Independence.

Paper For Above instruction

The Chi-squared test is a versatile statistical method widely used in research to analyze categorical data. It allows researchers to determine whether there is a significant association between variables or whether observed frequencies differ from expected frequencies. This paper will describe an example of a research question where a Chi-squared test has been applied, including the hypotheses involved, a numerical demonstration, and the interpretation of the P-value. Additionally, it will explain why both the Chi-squared Goodness of Fit Test and the Chi-squared Test for Independence are inherently right-tailed hypothesis testing problems.

Example of a Research Question Using a Chi-squared Test

Suppose a researcher is interested in examining whether a new marketing campaign influences customer preferences for four different product flavors: vanilla, chocolate, strawberry, and lemon. Prior to the campaign, the company conducted a survey of 400 customers, observing the following preference distribution:

• Vanilla: 90
• Chocolate: 100
• Strawberry: 110
• Lemon: 100

After implementing the marketing campaign, the company surveys another sample of 400 customers to see if preferences have shifted. The observed preferences are:

• Vanilla: 80
• Chocolate: 120
• Strawberry: 110
• Lemon: 90

The research question posed is: "Has the marketing campaign significantly influenced customer preferences for these flavors?" The null hypothesis (H₀) assumes that the preferences remain unchanged, meaning the distribution of flavors after the campaign mirrors the initial distribution pattern. The alternative hypothesis (H₁) suggests that the preferences have changed due to the campaign.

Mathematically, these hypotheses are expressed as:

• H₀: The observed frequencies follow the initial distribution proportions.
• H₁: The observed frequencies do not follow the initial distribution proportions.

To quantify this, we calculate the expected frequencies based on the initial preferences as proportions of the total sample size (400). Since the total sample size is 400 for both time points, the expected counts for the post-campaign survey, assuming no change, are proportional to the initial preferences:

• Vanilla: (90/400) * 400 = 90
• Chocolate: (100/400) * 400 = 100
• Strawberry: (110/400) * 400 = 110
• Lemon: (100/400) * 400 = 100

Using the observed counts (80, 120, 110, 90) and the expected counts, the Chi-squared statistic is computed as:

χ² = Σ [(Observed - Expected)² / Expected]

Calculating each component:

Sum of the components: 1.11 + 4.00 + 0 + 1.00 = 6.11

Next, with 3 degrees of freedom (number of categories minus 1), we consult the Chi-squared distribution table. For a significance level of α = 0.05, the critical value is approximately 7.815.

Since the calculated χ² statistic (6.11) is less than 7.815, we fail to reject the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level. The P-value associated with χ² = 6.11 and 3 degrees of freedom is approximately 0.11, which means there is an 11% probability of observing such a distribution (or more extreme) if the null hypothesis is true.

Interpreting the P-value in the context of this research indicates that, since it exceeds the typical significance threshold of 0.05, there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the marketing campaign significantly changed customer flavor preferences. The preferences are statistically consistent with remaining unchanged post-campaign.

Why Are the Chi-squared Tests Always Right-Tailed Hypothesis Testing Problems?

The Chi-squared tests, whether for goodness-of-fit or independence, are always right-tailed because of the nature of the test statistic's distribution. The Chi-squared distribution is positively skewed, meaning it only takes non-negative values (from zero to infinity). The test statistic itself measures the extent of discrepancy between observed and expected data, with larger values indicating greater deviation from the null hypothesis.

In hypothesis testing, the goal is to determine if the observed data is significantly inconsistent with the null hypothesis. The P-value corresponds to the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the observed value, assuming the null hypothesis is true. Since larger discrepancies produce larger test statistics, and the distribution is only skewed toward higher values, the critical region (where we reject H₀) resides in the right tail of the distribution.

Thus, the rejection area corresponds to higher values of the Chi-squared statistic, making it inherently a right-tailed test. Small values of the test statistic are consistent with the null hypothesis, while larger values indicate a deviation that warrants rejection. This characteristic is consistent across both types of Chi-squared tests discussed in this context: goodness-of-fit and independence tests.

Overall, the right-tailed nature of these tests aligns with their purpose—to detect significant deviations or associations—by focusing on the higher end of the distribution, where such deviations would be statistically significant.

References

• Agresti, A. (2007). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage Publications.
• McHugh, M. L. (2013). The Chi-Square Test of Independence. BioMed Research International, 2013.
• Pearson, K. (1900). On the Criterion That a Given System of Frequencies Is Inconsistent. Philosophical Magazine.
• Sheskin, D. J. (2011). Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
• Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2009). Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. Pearson.
• Kirk, R. E. (2013). Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Sage Publications.
• O’Connell, A. (2006). Professional Data Analysis. Cengage Learning.
• Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2016). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Cengage Learning.
• Hogg, R. V., McKean, J., & Craig, A. T. (2013). Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. Pearson.