The Code Of Ethics For Professional Teachers Serves As A Gui

The Code Of Ethics For Professional Teachersserves As A Guide For Teac

The Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers serves as a guide for teachers, specifically to new teachers, for them to exhibit proper behavior to the learning community at all times. It is imperative that you observe and practice this set of ethical and moral principles, standards, and values.

Directions: For this assignment, you will develop a 1-2 page, APA style paper that compares the Code of Ethics for two states listed below. As you read, respond to the following:

1. What code of ethics do they have in common?

2. What are the major differences?

3. Is there anything missing that you would include?

Code of Ethics (azed.gov)

OAR – The Ethical Educator (public.law)

Paper For Above instruction

The professional conduct and ethical standards of teachers play a vital role in shaping the educational environment and maintaining public trust. Comparing the Code of Ethics for Teachers as outlined by Arizona and Oregon reveals both shared values and distinct differences rooted in regional policies and cultural considerations.

In examining the commonalities, both Arizona’s and Oregon’s Codes of Ethics emphasize the fundamental commitment of teachers to prioritize student welfare, uphold integrity, and maintain professionalism. For instance, both codes advocate for teachers to foster an equitable, respectful, and safe learning environment while demonstrating a commitment to ongoing professional development. Respect for the diverse backgrounds of students and maintaining confidentiality also feature prominently, highlighting a shared understanding of the ethical responsibilities teachers bear regardless of geographic location.

However, the major differences are evident in the specific emphasis and scope of the codes. Arizona’s Code of Ethics underscores the importance of adhering to state laws and policies, including the specific licensing regulations that guide teacher conduct. It emphasizes the need for teachers to align their practices with state education standards and legislative mandates. Conversely, Oregon’s “The Ethical Educator” places a stronger focus on ethical decision-making frameworks and the moral considerations that should guide teaching practices. Oregon’s code emphasizes the importance of reflective practice and establishing a moral compass for addressing complex ethical dilemmas, which reflects an inward-looking approach centered on personal integrity and moral reasoning.

Furthermore, the codes differ in their provisions concerning community engagement and accountability. Arizona emphasizes compliance with legal standards and regulations as a core component, whereas Oregon encourages teachers to actively engage with the community and involve stakeholders in fostering a collaborative educational environment. This difference reflects regional priorities and values, with Oregon emphasizing shared community responsibility and Arizona focusing more on adherence to statutory requirements.

In considering what might be missing, both codes could benefit from a clearer delineation of ethical guidelines related to technology use, especially given the rapid growth of digital platforms in education. While both mention the importance of confidentiality and professionalism, explicit guidance on managing social media, data privacy, and online conduct would strengthen the codes’ relevance to contemporary teaching environments. Additionally, more emphasis on cultural competence and strategies for fostering inclusive classrooms could be integrated, reflecting the increasing diversity of student populations.

Overall, both Arizona and Oregon have well-developed ethical frameworks that serve as essential guides for teachers. They share core principles emphasizing student well-being, professionalism, and respect. Nonetheless, regional differences and the evolving landscape of education suggest that augmenting these codes with explicit policies on technology, diversity, and inclusive practices would enhance their applicability and effectiveness in guiding teachers today.

References

  • Arizona Department of Education. (n.d.). Code of Ethics for Educators. Retrieved from https://azed.gov
  • Oregon Department of Education. (n.d.). The Ethical Educator. Oregon Administrative Rules. Retrieved from https://public.law
  • American Educational Research Association. (2014). Ethical Principles of Educators. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 319-324.
  • National Education Association. (2019). Code of Ethics of the Education Profession. NEA.
  • Shapiro, J. P., & Stefkovich, J. A. (2016). Ethical Leadership and Decision Making in Education: Applying Theoretical Perspectives to Complex Dilemmas. Routledge.
  • Lovat, T. (2014). Ethics and Education. Routledge.
  • Banks, J. A. (2017). Citizenship Education and Diversity. Teachers College Record, 119(13), 1-30.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher Education and the American Future. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(4), 389-395.
  • Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Knight, P. (2015). Developing Professional Knowledge and Skills: A Guide for Teachers. Routledge.

Related Assignments