The Depreciation Dilemma: Ethical And Accounting Issues

The Depreciation Dilemma: Ethical and Accounting Issues in Financial Reporting

The case presents a significant ethical and accounting dilemma centered on the adjustment of depreciation estimates to manipulate profitability figures. The core issues involve the manipulation of asset valuation through changes in salvage values and useful life estimates, which directly impact depreciation expense and ultimately, company profitability. Adjusting salvage values upward and extending useful lives reduces annual depreciation expense, thereby inflating net income for the period. This approach appears as an easy fix to meet profitability targets demanded by management, but it raises serious questions about the integrity and accuracy of financial statements.

From an accounting perspective, depreciation is fundamentally an estimate based on the asset's expected useful life and residual value at the end of that life. The company's policy of using straight-line depreciation with zero salvage value simplifies calculations and aligns with industry standards, despite potentially undervaluing residual worth and undervaluing the asset’s useful life. Altering these estimates affects reported earnings significantly. Increasing salvage values and useful life assumptions would decrease annual depreciation expenses, artificially boosting profits. However, these adjustments are not strictly based on observable market data and involve subjective judgments, raising concerns regarding the transparency and truthfulness of financial reporting.

By changing salvage values and useful lives, the controller aims to achieve target profitability levels, which can have positive short-term effects such as improved stock prices and investor confidence. Nonetheless, these modifications distort the true economic condition of the company, potentially misinforming stakeholders and violating principles of ethical financial reporting. The dilemma emerges because such changes oppose the principles of honesty and integrity in financial communication but serve management’s immediate financial goals.

Proving the Dilemma through Christian Values and Rules

This scenario exemplifies a classic moral dilemma where two actions—altering depreciation estimates or maintaining accurate, potentially less favorable figures—are each justifiable from a Christian ethical perspective. On one side, the action of inflating depreciation estimates aligns with the Christian value of compassion and support for stakeholders dependent on the company’s performance; it exemplifies a desire to promote wellbeing and stability within the organization and its employees, consistent with Galatians 6:9, which encourages perseverance in doing good ("Let us not grow weary in doing good"). From this perspective, supporting management’s goal could be seen as promoting community stability and economic well-being.

Conversely, the Christian principle of truthfulness, rooted in Proverbs 12:22 ("The Lord detests lying lips, but he delights in people who are trustworthy") and Ephesians 4:25 ("Therefore each of you must put off falsehood and speak truthfully to your neighbor"), advocates for honest reporting. This stance emphasizes transparency and integrity, honoring God's command to be truthful in all dealings. Therefore, intentionally misrepresenting financial figures—by exaggerating salvage values and extending useful lives—would violate this core Christian value, misleading stakeholders and undermining trust.

Parties Affected by the Decision

The primary parties affected include the company's shareholders and investors, who rely on accurate financial statements for decision-making; the company’s employees, whose jobs and future stability depend on the company's financial health; management and the controller, who may face personal or professional consequences depending on the accuracy of reports; and external regulators and auditors, whose role is to ensure transparency and compliance with accounting standards.

Other affected parties include creditors, suppliers, and potential investors; inaccurate reporting might inflate the company's valuation, leading to misguided investment or loan decisions. Furthermore, the broader community and stakeholders ultimately bear the consequences of weakened corporate integrity if unethical practices are exposed or become habitual.

Recommendation and Ethical Resolution

Given the conflicting values and the long-term implications, the most ethically sustainable course of action is to deny the request to alter depreciation estimates dishonestly. The company should adhere to truthful accounting practices consistent with Christian principles of honesty and integrity gleaned from scripture. Any objective adjustments to depreciation, such as increasing salvage value or useful life, should be based on verifiable evidence, industry benchmarks, and justifiable estimates that reflect the true condition and prospects of the assets.

To reconcile the need for enhanced profitability and adherence to Christian ethics, the company should focus on legitimate strategies to improve financial performance. This could include operational efficiencies, strategic investments, or cost management, rather than manipulating accounting figures. Transparency in financial reports respects God's calling in Micah 6:8 ("He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God"). This approach promotes trustworthiness, aligns with biblical morality, and ultimately fosters sustainable success.

Impact of the Chosen Course of Action

Following an honest and ethically founded approach will have several positive impacts on the affected parties. Shareholders and investors can have confidence that the financial statements accurately reflect the company's true condition, enabling better decision-making and fostering long-term trust. Employees can enjoy job stability knowing that the company adheres to ethical standards, which enhances overall morale and corporate reputation.

Management and the board will avoid the risks associated with financial misrepresentation, including potential legal penalties, loss of credibility, and damaged stakeholder relationships. External auditors and regulators will be able to perform their duties effectively, promoting integrity in financial markets. Although this approach might temporarily hinder short-term profit targets, it aligns with Christian values of honesty, fairness, and accountability, ultimately supporting the company’s sustainable growth and reputation.

References

• DeFranco, G. (2018). Ethical implications of accounting estimates. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(2), 251–263.
• Helmer, K., & Geiger, M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and financial reporting: The role of ethical accounting practices. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(5), 1129–1150.
• LaRue, J. (2016). Biblical principles in financial decision-making. Christian Ethics Today, 42(3), 45–48.
• Micah 6:8. The Holy Bible, New International Version.
• OECD. (2015). Corporate governance and ethical reporting guidelines. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
• Price, R. L. (2019). The role of integrity in corporate reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 987–999.
• Robertson, J. C., & Stultz, C. M. (2017). Ethical challenges in accounting: A framework for decision-making. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(4), 319–329.
• Schreuder, H., & Coetzee, B. (2021). Christian values and corporate ethics: Making the connection. Journal of Business & Economic Ethics, 34(2), 231–245.
• Stanton, R. (2014). Honest accounting and moral responsibility. Faith & Finance Quarterly, 22(1), 12–19.
• Winston, R. (2015). Ethical dilemmas in financial reporting: A Christian perspective. Journal of Biblical Ethics, 4(1), 60–73.