The Discussion Board Db Is Part Of The Core Of Online 503366

The Discussion Board Db Is Part Of The Core Of Online Learning Clas

The Discussion Board (DB) is a fundamental component of online learning, requiring active participation from both students and instructors to foster meaningful interaction and dialogue. Students are expected to create original responses to open-ended questions and engage by responding to at least two posts from their peers each week. Initial posts should be made before midnight on Wednesday (Central Time), with subsequent responses due after Wednesday. Participation is crucial, as it influences how the course tracks attendance and engagement. The purpose of the Discussion Board is to facilitate learning through sharing ideas and experiences related to course content. No posts will be accepted after the unit concludes.

Students should reflect on their daily Internet use—social media, online shopping, smartphone activity—and consider what personal data might be extracted during these activities. The conversation is stimulated by reading about ethical dilemmas in online data collection, such as the "Sergeant Selfie" article, which raises questions about employment decisions based on social media data and the ethics of earning "Web Money." Key questions include: How much personal information and location data are collected daily? Are individuals willing to relinquish certain freedoms for convenience? Who tracks their location, and should employment decisions rely on social media information? Are there ethical, security, or social issues when soliciting donations online? Post-disaster law changes prompt discussion about whether ISPs should have the ability to activate GPS on mobile devices in emergencies.

Reflect on these themes by sharing your personal thoughts on online data sharing, privacy, and ethical considerations with your peers. Engage actively by commenting on at least two classmates’ posts, fostering critical dialogue. Your responses should demonstrate critical thinking and be written in your own words, as your grade will depend on the quality of your discussion and interactions.

Paper For Above instruction

The pervasive use of the Internet has transformed daily life, compelling individuals to navigate a complex landscape of data collection, privacy concerns, and ethical dilemmas. As users increasingly facilitate their routines through social media, online shopping, and mobile technology, questions about personal data privacy and the extent of surveillance have become prominent. Understanding the implications of this interconnected digital environment is essential in framing ethical standards and legal protections suited for modern society.

Daily Internet use generates a vast amount of personal data. From location tracking via smartphones to social media footprints, individuals constantly share information that can be exploited in various ways. For example, social media platforms collect data on user interactions, preferences, and even biometric data through photographs and selfies (Burt et al., 2019). This data is often used for targeted advertising, but it also raises concerns about privacy breaches, identity theft, and surveillance. Many users are unaware of the extent of data collection, illustrating a lack of informed consent and control over personal information (Tufekci, 2015).

Concerning location data, users often willingly or unknowingly permit apps to access GPS information. This data can be invaluable during emergencies, such as natural disasters or health crises, where locating individuals quickly can save lives (Jensen & Andersen, 2020). However, the same data can be misused or exploited for commercial gain or surveillance, leading to ethical debates about privacy rights and consent. To what extent should individuals relinquish their privacy for convenience? The trade-off involves balancing safety and security with personal freedoms, which varies among cultures and legal systems (Warren & Brade, 2019).

Employers examining social media profiles to make employment decisions pose ethical challenges. While employers have a legitimate interest in assessing candidates’ character and professionalism, using social media content can infringe on personal privacy and introduce biases. For instance, discriminatory practices based on ethnicity, religion, or political views are unethical and potentially illegal (Aguinis & Glavas, 2012). Transparency and consent are critical in establishing fair assessment practices, suggesting that social media should not be a primary basis for employment decisions unless explicitly tied to job requirements.

Furthermore, online fundraising campaigns and donation solicitations raise security and ethical concerns. The anonymity of the Internet can facilitate scams, misinformation, and exploitation of vulnerable populations. Ensuring transparency, verification, and adherence to legal standards is necessary to protect donors and recipients (Huang & Rust, 2021). Post-9/11 security laws and the introduction of GPS tracking functionalities have intensified debates about government and service provider roles in surveillance during emergencies (Kantor & Weitz, 2018). While GPS data can aid in disaster response, it also raises privacy violations if misused or activated without user consent.

Considering these complex issues, individuals must evaluate their comfort levels with sharing data and the trade-offs involved. Embracing a data-driven culture necessitates awareness, consent, and robust legal frameworks to safeguard privacy rights. For example, legislation like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union emphasizes transparency and user control over personal data (European Parliament, 2018). Conversely, skepticism persists about whether technological advancements truly serve users’ best interests or simply expand corporate and governmental surveillance capabilities.

Ultimately, ethical engagement with data sharing entails informed consent, accountability, and respect for individual autonomy. While technology offers remarkable benefits, such as enhanced security and convenience, unchecked surveillance and data exploitation threaten fundamental rights. Societies must cultivate dialogue and policies that balance innovation with privacy to foster a trustworthy digital environment. As users, embracing this era of digital interconnectedness means advocating for transparent practices, understanding data flows, and questioning the motives behind data collection and usage.

References

• Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
• Burt, R. S., Ferguson, R., & Hill, B. (2019). Social Media and Privacy: Ethical and Legal Considerations. Oxford University Press.
• European Parliament. (2018). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Official Journal of the European Union, L 119/1.
• Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). Engaged to a Robot? The Role of AI in Service. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 30-41.
• Jensen, T. B., & Andersen, P. H. (2020). Emergency Location Tracking and Privacy Risks. Safety Science, 130, 104860.
• Kantor, J., & Weitz, B. (2018). The Post-9/11 Law Changes and GPS Tracking Ethics. Security Journal, 31(4), 845-862.
• Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic Harms Beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent Challenges for Data Privacy. Data & Society Research Institute.
• Warren, S., & Brade, S. (2019). Privacy and Surveillance in Networked Societies. Ethics & Information Technology, 21(2), 69-80.