The Done Differently Analysis Is A Short Essay In Which You

The Done Differently Analysis Is A Short Essay In Which You Reflect On

The Done Differently Analysis is a short essay in which you reflect on one of your own past experiences in an organization, analyzing what you could or should have done differently in light of what you have learned in class. This essay will help you to connect the course learnings with your professional lives. It will also allow you to reflect on successful and failed strategies, which will help you better prepare and respond in the future. Although you will inevitably need to describe what happened during a past experience, the analysis should not be a detailed report of everything that happened. Instead, you should focus on analyzing what could or should have happened if you had known the course lessons discussed to-date—and why.

In addition to discussing how the process would have differed, you might also reflect on how the outcome would have differed. A high-quality analysis is one that steps back from a situation, identifies key events and processes, uses course concepts to help structure the analysis, and does so in a well-written fashion. The analysis should be no longer than two pages typed (double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point). See the rubric in the syllabus for evaluation criteria.

Paper For Above instruction

The purpose of this essay is to reflect on a personal past experience within an organization, analyze it through the lens of course concepts, and explore what could or should have been done differently. Effective reflection combines a descriptive recounting of the event with a critical analysis rooted in learned theories and frameworks, leading to insightful conclusions that could inform future actions.

To begin, select a specific organizational experience that was significant or instructive. This might be a project, a conflict, a decision, or a leadership situation that yielded valuable learning opportunities. In describing the event, focus on the context, key actors, your role, and the outcome, but avoid a lengthy recount—aim to keep the focus on critical aspects relevant to analysis.

Next, apply relevant course concepts to examine what transpired and identify areas where actions, decisions, or strategies could have been improved. For instance, if leadership was involved, consider theories of leadership styles, communication issues, or team dynamics. If decision-making was central, analyze the process using frameworks such as rational choice, bounded rationality, or ethical considerations.

Reflect on what you could have done differently based on these theories and lessons. For example, could better communication or conflict resolution skills have altered the outcome? Might a different leadership style or decision-making process have been more effective? Consider how awareness of these concepts at the time might have prompted different behaviors or strategies.

Furthermore, analyze how these potential changes might have affected the outcome. Would the project have been more successful? Would team cohesion or trust have improved? This evaluative step demonstrates a deeper understanding of the relationship between process adjustments and results.

Ensure your essay is well-structured, coherent, and concise—limiting it to two pages, double-spaced, in Times New Roman 12-point font. Use clear transitions and cite course concepts appropriately to bolster your analysis. A strong conclusion should synthesize your reflections and emphasize lessons learned for future organizational challenges.

References

• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.
• Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2013). Organizational behavior. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. Free Press.
• Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin.
• Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78-90.
• Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 99-109.
• Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1(2), 143–153.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Heifetz, R., & Laurie, D. L. (1997). The work of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 124-134.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.