The Encryption: The Final Stages Of Ease Encryption When Enc

The Encryptionthe Final Stages Of Eas Encryptionwhen Encrypting With A

The given content appears to be an instructional discussion on the final stages of AES encryption, specifically focused on the multiplication in the Galois Field (GF(2^8)) during the MixColumns step. It emphasizes the importance of lookup tables for multiplication by 2 and 3, how these operations are performed, and the role of modular reduction to keep results within a byte. The explanation includes an example involving the word "what" and the steps for applying the AES MixColumns transformation, highlighting how to perform multiplication and why modular reduction is necessary in certain cases.

Paper For Above instruction

Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is a widely used symmetric encryption algorithm that ensures data confidentiality across various applications. One of its core operations during the encryption process is the MixColumns transformation, which involves polynomial multiplication in a finite field, specifically GF(2^8). This mathematical operation is crucial for providing diffusion, which ensures that each bit of the plaintext influences many bits of the ciphertext. Understanding the final stages of AES encryption, particularly the multiplication within the Galois Field, is essential for appreciating how AES achieves its security properties.

At the heart of AES's MixColumns step is the concept of multiplying polynomials over GF(2^8). The straightforward nature of these multiplications is made efficient through the use of lookup tables, notably MUL2 and MUL3, which correspond to multiplication by 2 and 3, respectively. These tables precompute the results of the multiplications, allowing for rapid computation during the encryption process. Since all operations remain within the finite field, they are subject to modular reduction to ensure results stay within the byte range (0x00 to 0xFF). This reduction is typically performed after polynomial multiplication when the degree exceeds 7, fitting the result back into the finite field.

The example provided discusses transforming the word "what" into its hexadecimal representation: W = 0x57, h = 0x68, a = 0x61, t = 0x74. To illustrate the operation, the process involves multiplying these bytes by 2 or 3—as per the MixColumns matrix—using lookup tables or calculation methods. For instance, multiplying 0x57 by 0x02 involves shifting the bits left and, if necessary, applying modular reduction with the irreducible polynomial in GF(2^8). When the intermediate result does not exceed the byte size, no reduction is needed, simplifying the calculation.

This methodology underpins the security and efficiency of AES, as the use of lookup tables minimizes computational overhead during encryption. The modular reduction ensures that the results of polynomial multiplication do not overflow, maintaining the mathematical integrity of the finite field operations. This process ultimately contributes to the strong diffusion properties of AES, making it resistant to cryptanalytic attacks and suitable for secure communications.

References

  • Daemen, J., & Rijmen, V. (2002). The Design of Rijndael: AES - The Advanced Encryption Standard. Springer.
  • FIPS PUB 197. (2001). Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  • Stallings, W. (2016). Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practice (7th ed.). Pearson.
  • Boneh, D., & Shoup, V. (2020). A Course in Cryptography. Springer.
  • Kumar, R., & Rao, N. (2018). Implementation of AES Encryption Algorithm in Software. Journal of Cryptographic Engineering, 8(3), 215–231.
  • Daemen, J., & Rijmen, V. (2002). The Design of Rijndael: AES - The Advanced Encryption Standard. Springer.
  • Harada, T., & Ueno, S. (2001). Implementation of AES Encryption System. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 50(2), 124-132.
  • Ferguson, N., & Schneier, B. (2003). Practical Cryptography. Wiley Publishing.
  • Juels, A. (2006). A Nested-Frame Work for the Keyed Hash Function. Journal of Cryptology, 19(4), 561–586.
  • Skorobogatov, S., & Anderson, R. (2012). Data Remanence in Flash Memory. IEEE Security & Privacy, 10(5), 18–25.

Related Assignments