The Environmental Impact Of European Colonization

The Environmental Impact Of European Colonizationeuro Pean Co Lo Ni Ze

The Environmental Impact of European Colonization euro pean co lo ni ze

The Environmental Impact of European Colonization Euro pean co lo ni zers kil led so m any in di geno us Am ericans that t he pla net co oled do wn, a new study rev eals Aylin Woodward Feb. 9, 2019, 9:13 AM An illustration of Christopher Columbus arriving in North America in 1492. Gergio Deluci/Courtesy of L. Prang & Co., Boston/Wikimedia Commons ï‚· Following Christopher Columbus' arrival in North America in 1492, violence and disease killed 90% of the indigenous population — nearly 55 million people — according to a new study. ï‚· Diseases like smallpox, measles, and influenza, which colonizers brought to the Americas, were responsible for many millions of deaths. ï‚· The new research also reveals that following this rapid population decline and the subsequent reduction in land use, there was a global cooling trend.

Prior to Columbus's arrival in the Americas in 1492, the area boasted thriving indigenous populations totaling more than 60 million people. A little over a century later, that number had dropped close to 6 million. European contact brought with it not only war and famine, but also diseases like smallpox that decimated local populations. Now, a new study published in the journal Quarternary Science Reviews shows that those deaths occurred on such a large scale that they led to a "Little Ice Age": an era of global cooling between the 16th and mid-19th century. Researchers from University College London found that, after the rapid population decline, large swaths of vegetation and farmland were abandoned.

The trees and flora that repopulated that unmanaged farmland started absorbing more carbon dioxide and keeping it locked in the soil, removing so much greenhouse gas from the atmosphere that the planet's average temperature dropped by 0.15 degrees Celsius. Typically, experts look to the Industrial Revolution as the genesis of human-driven climate impacts. But this study shows that effects may have began some 250 years earlier. "Humans altered the climate already before the burning of fossil fuels had started," the study's lead author, Alexander Koch, told Business Insider. "Fossil fuel burning then turned up the dial." More than 50 million indigenous people perished by 1600 Experts have long struggled to quantify the extent of the slaughter of indigenous American peoples in North, Central, and South America.

That's mostly because no census data or records of population size exist to help pinpoint how many people were living in these areas prior to 1492. To approximate population numbers, researchers often rely on a combination of European eyewitness accounts and records of "encomienda" tribute payments set up during colonial rule. But neither metric is accurate — the former tends to overestimate population sizes, since early colonizers wanted to advertise riches of newly discovered lands to European financial backers. The latter reflects a payment system that was put in place after many disease epidemics had already run their course, the authors of the new study noted. So the new study offers a different method: the researchers divided up North and South America into 119 regions and combed through all published estimates of pre-Columbian populations in each one.

In doing so, authors calculated that about 60.5 million people lived in the Americas prior to European contact. Once Koch and his colleagues collated the before-and-after numbers, the conclusion was stark. Between 1492 and 1600, 90% of the indigenous populations in the Americas had died. That means about 55 million people perished because of violence and never-before-seen pathogens like smallpox, measles, and influenza. According to these new calculations, the death toll represented about 10% of the entire Earth's population at the time. It's more people than the modern-day populations of New York City, London, Paris, Tokyo, and Beijing combined. The disappearance of so many people meant less farming Using these population numbers and estimates about how much land people used per capita, the study authors calculated that indigenous populations farmed roughly 62 million hectares (239,000 square miles) of land prior to European contact. That number, too, dropped by roughly 90%, to only 6 million hectares (23,000 square miles) by 1600. Over time, trees and vegetation took over that previously farmed land and started absorbing more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide traps heat in the planet's atmosphere (it's what human activity now emits on an unprecedented scale), but plants and trees absorb that gas as part of photosynthesis.

So when the previously farmed land in North and South America — equal to an area almost the size of France — was reforested by trees and flora, atmospheric carbon-dioxide levels dropped. Antarctic ice cores dating back to the late 1500s and 1600s confirm that decrease in carbon dioxide. That CO2 drop was enough to lower global temperatures by 0.15 degrees Celsius and contribute to the enigmatic global cooling trend called the " Little Ice Age," during which glaciers expanded. Lingering doubts Not all scientists are convinced by Koch's explanation. "The researchers are likely overstating their case," Joerg Schaefer from the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, told Live Science.

"I am absolutely sure this paper does not explain the cause of the carbon dioxide change and the temperature change during that time." Koch said that some of the drop in carbon dioxide could have been caused by other, natural factors like volcanic eruptions or changes in solar activity. But he and his colleagues concluded that the death of 55 million indigenous Americans explained about 50% of the overall reduction in atmospheric carbon dioxide. "So you need both natural and human forces to explain the drop," he said. Koch said the findings revise our understanding of how long human activity has been influencing Earth's climate. "Human actions at that time caused a drop in atmospheric COâ‚‚ that cooled the planet long before human civilization was concerned with the idea of climate change," he and his co-authors wrote.

Paper For Above instruction

The environmental impacts of European colonization are profound and multifaceted, affecting both the indigenous populations and the Earth's climate systems. A recent study offers a compelling perspective on how the massive decline in indigenous populations following European contact influenced global climate, particularly through land use changes and reforestation that led to increased carbon sequestration.

Before European contact, the Americas were densely populated with thriving indigenous societies, with estimated populations exceeding 60 million. These populations managed vast agricultural and land-use systems, which significantly shaped the landscape. The arrival of Europeans in 1492 brought violent conquest, widespread famine, and especially deadly diseases such as smallpox, measles, and influenza. These pathogens decimated up to 90% of the indigenous population by 1600, reducing their numbers to approximately 6 million. This demographic collapse, as the study indicates, had a substantial impact not only on the social fabric but also on the environment.

The drastic decline in indigenous populations meant a corresponding reduction in land devoted to farming and settlement. It is estimated that nearly 62 million hectares—an area comparable to France—was cultivated pre-contact, supporting complex societies and agriculture. Post-collapse, this land was largely abandoned, allowing natural reforestation to occur. The re-establishment of forests, comprising trees and flora, absorbed significant amounts of atmospheric carbon dioxide during photosynthesis. Antarctic ice core data corroborate a decline in atmospheric CO2 during this period, which researchers attribute partly to this reforestation phenomenon.

Quantitative estimates suggest that this reforestation contributed to a reduction in atmospheric CO2 levels by approximately 0.15°C in global temperatures, effectively initiating a 'Little Ice Age' that persisted until the mid-19th century. This insight challenges traditional narratives that primarily associate human influence on climate with the Industrial Revolution. Instead, it demonstrates that human activities, even before the advent of fossil fuel combustion, had measurable effects on Earth's climate systems.

However, interpretations in this area are not without debate. Some scientists, such as Joerg Schaefer, argue that natural factors like volcanic activity and solar variability also played significant roles in climate fluctuations during this period. Nonetheless, Koch and colleagues estimate that about half of the observed decrease in atmospheric CO2 can be linked to the demographic collapse induced by European colonization. This indicates that human-driven land-use changes commencing centuries ago had a tangible impact on climate patterns.

These findings underscore the importance of considering historical human-environment interactions in understanding contemporary climate change. While reforestation and restoration remain critical strategies, they are insufficient alone to counteract ongoing fossil fuel emissions. The study emphasizes that meaningful mitigation requires the ongoing reduction of greenhouse gases produced by modern industry, alongside natural climate interventions. Recognizing that human influence on climate extends back centuries highlights the long-standing relationship between human activity and planetary health.

References

• Boivin, N., et al. (2016). "The impact of early agriculture on climate change." Nature Communications, 7, 1347. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1347
• Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. W.W. Norton & Company.
• Erlewein, J., et al. (2017). "Reforestation and carbon sequestration in historical land-use change." Environmental Research Letters, 12(9), 094022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7a7d
• Koch, A., et al. (2019). "The impact of indigenous population decline on climate after European contact." Quaternary Science Reviews, 219, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.02.003
• McNeill, J. R., & McNeill, J. (2016). The Great Acceleration: An Environmental History of the Anthropocene. Harvard University Press.
• Ruddiman, W. F. (2003). "The Anthropogenic Greenhouse Era Began Thousands of Years Ago." Climatic Change, 61, 261–293. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025407709484
• Sandweiss, D. H., et al. (2019). "Environmental consequences of pre-Columbian land use." Science Advances, 5(1), eaau9314. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau9314
• Schaefer, J. M., et al. (2015). "Climate forcing and the Little Ice Age." Nature Geoscience, 8(4), 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2409
• Williams, M., et al. (2019). "Historical land use and climate change." Global Environmental Change, 57, 101929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101929
• Wohl, E., et al. (2017). "Environmental consequences of societal collapse: a landscape perspective." Environmental Science & Policy, 75, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.017