The Estimating Problem 1: Barbara Just Received The Good New

The Estimating Problem1 Barbara Just Received The Good News She Was A

The case describes a scenario involving project estimation techniques within a project management context. It details the process of bidding on a project, the role of the estimating team, and the differences in opinion regarding the estimated durations for a critical work package. The case emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate estimating methods, considering project complexity, and making informed decisions based on multiple estimates to ensure project success and avoid penalties for late delivery.

Paper For Above instruction

Project estimation is a fundamental aspect of project management, directly impacting project success, cost control, scheduling, and stakeholder satisfaction. Accurate estimation ensures that resources are allocated appropriately, timelines are realistic, and project risks are mitigated. The case of Barbara underscores the complexity of estimation processes and the critical need for selecting suitable estimation techniques, especially when dealing with unfamiliar or complex work packages.

The case introduces several estimation techniques, mainly the three-point estimate, the triangular distribution, and analogy estimating. The three-point estimate involves calculating an expected duration based on optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic estimates. In the case, the estimating group used a three-point estimate where the optimistic duration was four weeks, the most likely was thirteen weeks, and the pessimistic was sixteen weeks. This method, rooted in the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT), often weights the most probable estimate more heavily, but it may overlook project complexities when assumptions are overly simplistic.

Barbara critiques this approach, noting that the estimate of four weeks underestimates the complexity associated with the work package in her project. Based on her experience, she recognizes that the work typically takes around fourteen weeks, indicating that the three-point estimate, in this case, potentially produces a misleadingly optimistic figure. Consequently, she explores the triangular distribution as an alternative, which assigns equal likelihood to each of the three estimates, resulting in a final estimate of thirteen weeks. This approach better aligns with her experience but still requires critical judgment to select the most appropriate estimate.

Peter, the subject matter expert (SME), suggests that analogy estimating could be more appropriate, especially considering project complexity. Analogy estimating compares current work with past similar projects, adjusting for differences in scope, resources, or complexity. Peter estimates the work would take about 16–17 weeks based on his experience with similar work packages, highlighting the importance of incorporating expert judgment and historical data into the estimation process. Choosing between these techniques involves evaluating their respective assumptions, data sources, and how well they account for project-specific factors like complexity, resource availability, and risk.

Deciding on the most reliable estimate among multiple methods requires a comprehensive understanding of each method’s strengths and limitations. A project manager must consider the context of the project, the accuracy of historical data, and the degree of complexity involved. For example, the three-point estimate is quick and easy but may oversimplify complex scenarios. Conversely, analogy estimating with expert judgment can provide more realistic forecasts but depends heavily on the SME’s experience and available data. Therefore, triangulating estimates from different methods and consulting with experienced personnel enhances decision accuracy and project planning effectiveness.

If I were the project manager, I would favor a combined approach that incorporates multiple techniques—using the analogy estimate as a baseline, adjusting it based on the three-point estimates, and considering the distribution approach. Specifically, given Peter’s experience and the complexity involved, I would lean towards a duration of approximately 16 weeks, as this better reflects the real-world challenges associated with the work. I would also consider buffer time for unforeseen delays, especially considering the potential for complex issues that might arise during execution. This approach balances optimism with realism and aligns with risk management best practices.

Ultimately, effective project estimation necessitates a thoughtful synthesis of quantitative data, expert opinion, and contextual factors. The case of Barbara demonstrates that relying solely on a single method can lead to underestimations and potential project risks. Instead, employing a combination of techniques, informed by experience and historical data, provides a more reliable foundation for project scheduling and resource allocation. Such an approach helps in setting realistic expectations, avoiding penalties, and enhancing overall project success.

References

• Aher, A. A. (2015). Project Management Estimation Techniques: A Review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 4(6), 45–58.
• Baccarini, D. (1999). The logical framework method for defining project requirements. World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science.
• Biazzo, S., & Monti, R. (2004). An Analogy-Based Approach to Estimating Project Duration and Cost. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(4), 530–541.
• Heldman, K. (2018). Project Management JumpStart (3rd ed.). Wiley.
• Khot, V. (2019). Cost Estimation Techniques in Project Management. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 14(13), 1273–1277.
• Kirkland, P. (2014). Effective Project Estimation. Project Management Institute.
• PMI (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th Edition). Project Management Institute.
• Shtub, A., Bard, J. F., & Globerson, S. (2005). Project Management: Engineering, Technology, and Implementation. Prentice Hall.
• Winch, G. M. (2010). Managing Construction Projects. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Young, T. L. (2018). Successful Project Management (6th ed.). Pearson.