The Flynn Effect And The Role Of Environment And Heredity

The Flynn effect and the role of environment and heredity in intelligence

The Flynn effect refers to the observed phenomenon of rising intelligence test scores over time, suggesting that each successive generation tends to perform better on standardized IQ assessments than previous ones (Cohen, Swerdlik, & Sturman, 2012). This phenomenon raises questions about the underlying factors contributing to increased intelligence scores, especially whether environmental influences, genetic predispositions, or a combination of both are responsible for this upward trend.

In the article “Children becoming more intelligent: Can the Flynn effect be generalized to other intelligence tests?” by Wilma Resing and Erika Tunteler (2007), the primary focus was on examining environmental factors impacting intelligence development. Their study involved administering the same intelligence test to children 25 years apart, revealing that recent test-takers outperformed earlier cohorts. The authors particularly emphasized the role of environmental factors, such as improved educational systems, nutrition, access to information, and overall socio-economic conditions, in enhancing cognitive abilities over time. They also considered the potential influence of memory and information retention, which could be improved through environmental enrichment.

While Resing and Tunteler’s study effectively highlights the significance of environmental factors, it notably did not directly investigate the role of heredity. This limitation underscores a broader debate within psychological research regarding the relative contributions of nature versus nurture in intelligence development. Hereditary influences, supported by numerous twin and family studies, suggest that genetics account for a substantial proportion of individual differences in intelligence (Plomin, DeFries, Knopik, & Neiderhiser, 2016). Conversely, environmental factors, especially those related to education, socioeconomic status, and health, can also significantly influence IQ scores and developmental trajectories (Nisbett et al., 2012).

It is increasingly understood that intelligence is a complex trait shaped by an interplay of genetic predispositions and environmental exposures. For instance, genetic factors may set a potential range for intellectual ability, but environmental conditions determine the extent to which an individual realizes this potential. The Flynn effect exemplifies this interaction, as improvements in environment and living conditions over generations correlate with increased IQ scores (Trahan, Stuebing, & Plante, 2014).

Therefore, it is essential to recognize that both heredity and environment contribute to intelligence development. While genetic makeup provides the foundational capacity, environmental factors shape the extent and manner in which this capacity is expressed. Future research should aim to analyze how these influences interact over time and across different populations to better understand the mechanisms behind rising intelligence scores and to develop interventions that can optimize cognitive development for all children.

References

  • Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Sturman, E. D. (2012). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests & measurement (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist, 67(2), 130–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026699
  • Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2016). Top 10 replicated findings from behavioral genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615617439
  • Resing, W. C., & Tunteler, E. (2007). Children becoming more intelligent: Can the Flynn effect be generalized to other child intelligence tests? International Journal of Testing, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/15305050701323331
  • Trahan, D., Stuebing, K. K., & Plante, E. (2014). The Flynn effect: A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 25(9), 2194–2200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614548975

Related Assignments