The Focus Of The Presentation Must Reflect The Learni 217404

The Focus Of The Presentation Must Reflect The Learning Objectives Of

The focus of the presentation must reflect the learning objectives of the course and be drawn from the current clinical setting of the student practice site. The evaluation criteria for the presentation include the following:

• Chief Complaint & pertinent history (10 points)
• Pertinent exam and diagnostics (10 points)
• Working diagnosis with supporting criteria (5 points)
• Management plan (5 points)
• Epidemiological data cited from literature (10 points)
• Evidence-based rationale for treatment based on literature (10 points)
• Analysis of self-care and family issues related to diagnosis and treatment plan (20 points)
• Evaluation parameters used to determine outcomes (10 points)
• Identification of major lessons learned and implications for future practice (20 points)

The total score for the presentation is 100 points.

Reflective Writing: Texas Legislative Branch and Federalism

When completing your essay, you must provide in-text citations for any work that is directly quoted or paraphrased. Your response should be your own thoughts and analysis, thoroughly responding to the prompt. Incorporate scholarly resources as evidence or examples to support your analysis, and ensure your writing uses complete sentences, proper grammar, and clarity. The essay should analyze the gathered information and use it to complete the constitutional chart through application, providing specific examples and supporting responses. The essay must be at least two pages in length, excluding the bibliography.

The bibliography should be on a separate page, unless using footnotes. Submit the entire assignment—essay and bibliography—together as a single file in .pdf, .doc, or .docx format via Eagle Online. Submissions in other formats will not be reviewed and will receive a zero without re-submission. The quality of organization and detailed examples is more important than length.

Prompt Options

Respond to one of the following prompts:

1. Thinking about federalism and the distribution of power between federal and state governments, identify current federal and Texas laws regulating elections—covering electoral processes, eligibility, candidate qualifications, election timing, and winner determination. Discuss inconsistencies among these laws and illustrate potential impacts on electoral outcomes, winner legitimacy, and democratic representation of constituents.
2. In your opinion, is re-redistricting before the decennial census a crime, legally and constitutionally? Or, given the demographic complexities across state elections, should re-mapping be a reserved power of the states to maximize democracy? Use Texas as an example, considering its culture and political attitudes, to explain how re-mapping could reflect those values.
3. Argue whether re-redistricting is legal and whether it might violate the Voting Rights Act. Discuss whether the federal judicial system should involve itself in partisan redistricting—considering Justice Frankfurter's concept of the "political thicket." Should resolving gerrymandering be left to voters and states or managed federally?