The Following Responses Are Due. Follow The Prompt Closely ✓ Solved

The following responses are due. Follow the prompt closely, and make sure your paper is clearly organized according to the following sections

The assignment requires a comprehensive written response addressing multiple analytical and interpretive components based on a prompt that discusses economic inequality in America and potential remedies involving government and employer intervention. The response must include a structured organization with sections covering a summary of a specified book or article, personal reactions, analysis of style and literary devices, social relevance, critical source evaluations, close readings of significant passages, thematic exploration, and connections to other literature studied during the semester. The paper should include citations from three specified secondary sources, incorporating in-text citations and a properly formatted Works Cited list, all within a 400-500 word limit. Writing should be clear, properly formatted in MLA style, handwritten on one side of notebook paper, with appropriate editing markers, and using ink only. The response must demonstrate understanding of the prompt, integrating ideas from all three sources, and consider the effects and possible consequences of proposed remedies to economic inequality.

Paper For Above Instructions

The core of this assignment involves critically analyzing the issue of economic inequality in America as discussed in three key sources: an article from The Economist, and essays by Kornbluh and Surowiecki. The prompt directs an exploration of the roles that government and employers might play in addressing income disparity, evaluating proposed remedies for their potential effectiveness and consequences.

In the summary section, I will briefly describe the overarching themes of the sources, such as the trend of increasing inequality, its implications for the American Dream, and proposed policy responses. The personal response section will elucidate my emotional and intellectual reflections on these issues, considering how they impact my view of social justice and economic fairness.

The style and literary devices section will analyze the writing techniques—such as rhetorical strategies, diction, and structure—that authors employ to persuade readers about the urgency of addressing inequality. This might include examining how the authors appeal to ethos and pathos, or their use of statistical data and historical context to strengthen their arguments.

The social application will interpret why these discussions are distinctly American—pertaining to the nation’s values of opportunity and mobility—and why Americans should care, since economic inequality affects social cohesion, economic stability, and the core ideals of fairness.

In critical responses, I will summarize two scholarly sources that provide interpretive insights into the book or articles. These analyses will deepen understanding of the issues, offering perspectives on policy effectiveness, social stratification, or economic theories that underpin the primary texts.

The close reading will feature three significant passages, perhaps early, middle, and concluding, or pivotal scenes, explaining their significance both in immediate context and within the larger narrative or argument of the text. The analysis will highlight language power, thematic resonance, and the scenes' role in advancing central ideas.

The themes identified may include economic mobility, social justice, and corporate responsibility, each explored through specific commentary about their significance and implications.

Finally, I will connect the primary texts to three other works studied this semester, discussing thematic overlaps or contrasts—such as disparities in social classes, political activism, or economic policies—demonstrating an integrated understanding of the course materials.

Throughout, the paper will include in-text citations from all sources and a properly formatted MLA Works Cited section, weaving together the insights to support the argument that both government and employers have roles to play, but that policies must be carefully designed to promote fair and sustainable economic growth. This comprehensive approach will ensure the response aligns with academic standards, providing a nuanced discussion of inequality and remedies in contemporary America.

References

• The Economist. “Inequality and the American Dream.” The Economist.com, 15 June 2016, leader/2006/06/15/inequality-and-the-american-dream.
• Kornbluh, Karen. “Win-Win Flexibility: A Policy Proposal.” New America Foundation, June 2005, documents/356/win-win-flexibility-a-policy-proposal.
• Surowiecki, James. “A Fair Days Wage.” The New Yorker, 9 Feb. 2015, magazine/2015/02/09/fair-days-wage.
• [Additional scholarly sources would be listed here, formatted according to MLA guidelines.]