The Following Rubric Provides Guidelines That Describe Perfo

The Following Rubric Provides Guidelines That Describe Performance Com

The following rubric provides guidelines that describe performance completing summary/evaluation memos. The basic goals of the summary portion of your memo follow: 1. Condense the reading selection. (Be brief yet complete; no major ideas should be missing.) 2. Summarize completely. (Include the author's thesis, main points, and conclusions.) 3. Paraphrase. (Put the author's ideas into your own words.) Note: Please write in the Third Person.

If you must make use personal pronouns in the evaluation section, be sure to use "we". The basic goals of the evaluation portion of your memo follow: 1. Relate the reading to personal experience. 2. Use logical, well-developed examples to explain the response to the reading. 3. Demonstrate critical thinking. Remember the CLASS system when reviewing the following descriptions: C=completeness L=literacy A=attitude S=strategy S=style Check the grade assigned for the performance indicators against the extended rubric contained in Course Lecture 2: Summarizing and Evaluating. You should prepare for discussion by summarizing King's and Swift's documents. Paraphrase their theses, main points, and conclusions.

To accomplish this feat, look for the six features of successful proposals. Successful proposals and reports: 1. Define a problem. 2. Define a solution. 3. Discuss the advantages of the solution. 4. Anticipate and refute objections to the solution. 5. Discuss how to implement the solution. 6. Justify costs of the solution. "Letter from Birmingham City Jail"Jail" or Optional MLK Letter "A Modest Proposal"

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires creating a comprehensive summary and evaluation memo based on provided documents, specifically King’s "Letter from Birmingham City Jail" and Swift’s "A Modest Proposal." The goal is to accurately condense the key ideas, arguments, and conclusions of these texts, paraphrasing in third person, and then to critically evaluate them by relating the content to personal experience using logical examples. The evaluation should demonstrate critical thinking guided by the CLASS system, which emphasizes Completeness, Literacy, Attitude, Strategy, and Style.

The first part of the memo involves summarizing the reading selection, which should be brief yet complete, capturing the author's thesis, central points, and conclusions without missing major ideas. Paraphrasing these ideas into one's own words ensures comprehension and avoids plagiarism. For "Letter from Birmingham City Jail," the focus is on the themes of justice, activism, and moral duty in the fight against racial segregation. Swift’s "A Modest Proposal" explores social critique through irony and satire concerning poverty and overpopulation, proposing a shocking solution to evoke reflection.

In the evaluation section, the writer is expected to relate the readings to personal experiences—perhaps reflecting on civil rights struggles or societal issues—and to provide well-developed, logical examples that support their response. This section must also showcase critical thinking, assessing the effectiveness, ethical implications, and relevance of the proposals and arguments presented in the texts.

Understanding the key features of successful proposals enhances the critique. For example, in analyzing King's and Swift's texts, one should identify whether they define problems clearly, propose solutions, discuss benefits, anticipate objections, outline implementation strategies, and justify costs. These features form the framework for assessing the strength and persuasiveness of each proposal.

Overall, the memo aims to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the texts, articulate an insightful evaluation, and adhere to academic standards of paraphrasing, logical reasoning, and critical analysis within a structured format.

References

• King, M. L., Jr. (1963). Letter from Birmingham City Jail. The Atlantic. https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
• Swift, J. (1729). A Modest Proposal. The Original Writings of Jonathan Swift. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1080/1080-h/1080-h.htm
• Corbett, A. T., & Conklin, C. T. (2014). Writing; Researching, and Publishing in the Digital Age. Pearson.
• Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2016). A Writer’s Reference. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
• Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2017). They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Lunsford, A. A., & Connors, R. J. (2016). The Everyday Writer. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
• Blair, B. (2011). Critical Thinking, Reading, and Writing: A Brief Guide to Argument. Wadsworth.
• Turabian, K. L. (2018). A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. University of Chicago Press.
• Elbow, P. (1998). Writing With Power: Techniques for Mastering the Writing Process. Oxford University Press.
• Severino, C. (2008). The Craft of Research. University of Chicago Press.