The Franciscos Investment Options Hector Francisco I

The Franciscos Investment Optionshector Francisco I

Hector Francisco is a successful businessman in Atlanta who has accumulated a substantial investment account primarily through an aggressive investment stance. He is focused on building his retirement fund and has been closely monitoring Rembrandt Paper Products (RPP), a stock he believes will appreciate significantly within six months. Hector forecasts the stock reaching approximately $80 per share from its current level of $57.50, with anticipated dividends of $2.40 annually, paid in two quarterly installments over the six-month period. Notably, Hector has also identified options markets on RPP with strike prices of $50 and $60, trading at $8 and $5 respectively, providing potential leverage opportunities.

The assignment requires an analysis of investment alternatives available to Hector for a maximum of six months and extends to a two-year horizon, evaluating the potential returns if the stock target price is achieved. Further, it involves calculating the value of call options at the end of the holding period, assessing the return for each investment vehicle—direct stock purchase, options, or other derivatives—and offering a recommendation based on profit maximization and risk considerations.

Paper For Above instruction

Hector Francisco’s investment decision-making process embodies a strategic evaluation of various financial instruments with different risk-return profiles. Given his optimistic forecast for RPP, his primary goal is to capitalize on a potential surge in stock price within a six-month window, while considering the risk mitigation opportunities provided by options markets. The core investment alternatives include purchasing the stock outright, buying call options, or engaging in more complex derivatives. For a six-month investment horizon, Hector’s choices are limited to these instruments, but extending to a two-year horizon broadens his spectrum to include longer-dated options, stock purchases, and possibly leveraged ETFs or other derivatives.

The direct purchase of RPP shares is straightforward; Hector invests directly in stock expecting the price appreciation. The call options provide a leveraged position with capped downside risk equal to the premium paid. If Hector’s forecast proves correct and the stock price reaches $80, the options can amplify gains, but if the stock stagnates or declines, the maximum loss is limited to the premiums paid for the options. The valuation of these options depends on various factors, including the underlying stock price, volatility, and the time remaining until expiration.

Assuming Hector holds the stock for six months, with the stock appreciating to $80, the stock’s capital gain would be ($80 - $57.50) = $22.50 per share, plus the dividends of $2.40 per share, resulting in a total income of $24.90 per share. The return on investment would then reflect this gain relative to the initial purchase price. For the options, their intrinsic value at expiration would be the difference between the stock price and strike price, capped at the premium paid if the stock does not exceed the strike. The call with a $50 strike would be worth ($80 - $50) = $30, minus the premium of $8, leading to a net gain of $22 per share, whereas the $60 strike call would be worth ($80 - $60) = $20, minus the $5 premium, yielding a net profit of $15.

Hector’s optimal course depends on whether he prioritizes maximum profit or risk-adjusted returns. The stock purchase offers the highest potential upside but also exposes him to full downside risk if the stock declines. The call options provide leverage with limited risk to the premium, allowing him to benefit from significant upside movement without risking more than the premium paid. If Hector’s primary goal is profit maximization under the presumption of a favorable stock movement, buying calls might be the most suitable choice.

Furthermore, risk considerations include market volatility, potential for stock price stagnation, and the cost of premiums. In a broader context, if Hector prefers to minimize risks, he could consider spreading strategies such as bull call spreads or protective puts, which can offer structured risk-return profiles aligning with his risk appetite. If other factors such as market volatility or liquidity constraints are included, the decision would lean towards instruments that balance these aspects effectively.

In conclusion, given Hector’s bullish outlook and aggressive investment profile, purchasing call options with favorable strike prices appears to align with his profit maximization goal. However, carefully considering market risk, volatility, and potential for adverse movement should inform his final decision, possibly combining stock purchases and derivatives for an optimized strategy.

References

• Hull, J. C. (2018). Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives. Pearson.
• Kolb, R. W., & Overdahl, J. A. (2016). Financial Derivatives: Pricing and Risk Management. Wiley.
• Chance, D. M., & Brooks, R. (2015). Fundamentals of Investments. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Fabozzi, F. J. (2013). Bond Markets, Analysis, and Strategies. Pearson.
• Huang, D., & Wang, S. (2019). Financial Derivatives and Risk Management. Springer.
• Reilly, F. K., & Brown, K. C. (2012). Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management. Cengage Learning.
• Marcus, A. J. (2015). Investment Strategies of Hedge Funds. Routledge.
• McDonald, R. (2016). Derivatives Markets. Pearson.
• John, T., & Huyghebaert, N. (2019). Investiments: An Introduction. Routledge.
• Seeley, J., & Winstanley, G. (2018). Investing in Futures and Options. Wiley.