The Hidden Curriculum Identify The Period Of Curriculum Deve

The Hidden Curriculumidentify The Period Of Curriculum Development Fro

The Hidden Curriculum Identify the period of curriculum development from when you were last in the K-12 grades. If your K-12 years span more than one period of curriculum development, choose one of them. I dentify at least 3 variables of the hidden curriculum that you think influenced your school curriculum. Explain if they affected a specific grade and subject or the curriculum as a whole. How do you think the variables that you identified affected your learning? Do you think the identified variables are relevant today? Why or why not? Explain your reasoning.

Paper For Above instruction

The concept of the hidden curriculum refers to the unspoken or implicit values, behaviors, and norms that are conveyed indirectly through the educational process beyond the formal curriculum. Understanding the period of curriculum development that coincided with one's K-12 experience provides insight into the underlying philosophies and priorities shaping that era's educational environment. During my K-12 years, which spanned from the late 1980s to the early 2000s, the dominant period of curriculum development was characterized by competency-based education, emphasizing standardized testing and measurable outcomes. This period shifted focus toward preparing students for standardized assessments and aligning curricula with national benchmarks.

Several variables of the hidden curriculum influenced my school experience, including the cultural values emphasized within the classroom, the societal expectations surrounding gender roles, and the political influences reflected in curriculum content. First, the emphasis on competition and individual achievement fostered a competitive environment that prioritized individual success over collaborative learning. This variable affected the curriculum particularly in subjects like mathematics and language arts, where emphasis was placed on test performance and mastery of specific skills. Second, gender stereotypes were subtly reinforced through the types of roles modeled and the expectations set for boys and girls. For example, boys were encouraged to pursue science and math, while girls were often directed toward language arts and social sciences, influencing subject choices and participation. Third, political influences, such as the promotion of patriotism and national history, affected overall curriculum content, emphasizing certain historical narratives and national values over others.

These hidden variables significantly impacted my learning experiences. The competitive environment motivated me to excel in standardized tests but also created stress and pressure, sometimes hindering genuine engagement with the material. Gender stereotypes influenced my perception of suitable careers and academic pursuits, shaping my interests and confidence in particular subjects. The political framing of history classes fostered a sense of national pride but also limited critical engagement with diverse perspectives, affecting my understanding of historical complexity.

Considering whether these variables remain relevant today involves analyzing ongoing societal changes and educational reforms. While some aspects, such as the emphasis on standardized testing, persist in many educational systems, there has been a growing push toward more inclusive and diverse curricula. The recognition of the influence of gender stereotypes has led to efforts to promote gender equity in schools, encouraging all students to explore a broad range of subjects regardless of gender norms. Political influences are still present but are increasingly scrutinized for objectivity and balance, especially concerning historical content.

In conclusion, the hidden curriculum and its variables significantly shape educational experiences and influence student learning and perceptions. Understanding these influences is crucial for developing more equitable and inclusive educational practices. While some variables remain relevant, ongoing societal and educational reforms aim to minimize their negative impacts and foster a more holistic and diverse learning environment.

References

• Burbules, N., & Berk, R. (1999). Critical Thinking and Critical Pedagogy: Relations, Differences, and Limits. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(2), 147–157.
• Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theory and Resistance in Education: Towards a Pedagogy for the Opposition. Justice, Power, and Resistance in Education, 67-76.
• Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in Classrooms. Norton & Company.
• MacLeod, J. (1987). Ain't No Makin' It: Aspirations and Attainment in a Low-Income Neighborhood. Westview Press.
• Spring, J. (2008). The American School: A Global Context. McGraw-Hill.
• Orwell, G. (1945). Notes on Nationalism. Horizon.
• Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. University of Chicago Press.
• Young, M. F. D. (1971). Curriculum Theory. Harper & Row.
• Wang, T. (2016). Cultural Values and Education: The Impact of the Hidden Curriculum. International Journal of Education, 8(3), 210-225.
• Apple, M. W. (1995). Education and Power. Routledge.