The Human Race Is Structured In A Way That Differs

Responses1 La1the Human Race Is Structured In A Way That Different Ind

Responses1 La1the Human Race Is Structured In A Way That Different Ind

Responses 1-LA1 The human race is structured in a way that different individual have different opinions. Similarly, people might have some similar moral ethics while others differ. The Virtue ethical theory is universal in that attributes are universally recognized as good or bad (The Universal Moral Code). Kant’s and the Utilitarian theories are relative. First, Kant’s theory dwells on the fulfillment of a responsibility.

Some responsibilities are accepted in some communities while others do not. Similarly, utilitarianism looks at the consequences of the actions, which differ according to the community. Ethical relativism and universalism differ in more than one way. However, with the correct attitude towards a particular action, one will be able to distinguish whether it is beneficial or not. Activities that evoke difference in opinions should be minimized at all times.

In addition, making sure that the actions are clear so that an individual is able to distinguish between right and wrong is also important. Furthermore, appreciating the different cultures help individuals to adapt to any change brought forward. Reference The Universal Moral Code. Retrieved from 1-LA2 This is a technological era that we expect more technological discoveries to continue coming in. One of such discoveries is the self-driving car, which makes the effort being put in by human beings almost negligible.

Concerns about the vehicle come in when a decision has to be made in the case of an unexpected accident (Why Self-Driving Cars Must Be Programmed to Kill, 2015). Some people will choose to go over the ten people on crossing the road, while others will choose to have the individual by the sidewalk be a sacrifice. It is very rare for an individual who bought the car to make himself or herself a sacrifice. This means that in the case of an accident, they are bound to run over other people. The self-driving car evokes different views by different people.

However, one thing is clear, one has to either kill others or risk dying. In my opinion, I would rather stay die than see ten other people die. Reference Why Self-Driving Cars Must Be Programmed to Kill. (2015, October 22). Retrieved from 2-LA1 From a teleological Virtue Ethic approach, supporters of this theory would conclude that morality is universal. According to Keith (2003), the universal moral code is separated into two sets of statements that involve “do no harm†and “do good.†This concept is based on people acting virtuously.

An opposing view may argue the concept of relativism stating a moral code is relative to an individual’s or groups geographical location (Basilthegiant, n.d.). Using an example from Keith’s universal code such as do not murder is something that disproves the opposing view. Some may argue that there are times when murder can be justified such as war or self-defense. Going back to the foundation of virtue ethics of everyone acting virtuously, there would be no need for such acts. A Kantian view would deem only acts that can be universalized would be proper moral code (Downs, 2004).

Therefore, moral code cannot be relative. Kantianism not only advocates universalism but it also rejects those principles that cannot be “willed for all,†regardless of desires, happiness, or acceptance (O’Neill, 1996). In regards to a business situation, the maximum that can be universalized would be the acceptable moral code. The concept of utilitarianism morality is more of a relative view. Supporter of utilitarianism would suggest that moral code is relative to an action that provides the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.

References Basilthegiant. (n.d.). Is there a universal moral code? Retrieved from Downs, C. (2004). A kantian approach to business ethics. University College of Chichester. Retrieved from Keith, K. (2003). The universal moral code. Retrieved from O’Neill, O. (1996). Universalism in ethics. Retrieved from 2-LA2 It seems that a vast majority of the society today has become more and more dependent on the next new, exciting, and innovative product. As technology continues to advance at an alarming rate, many new technological innovations are introduced into society without little to no government regulation. The government has a responsibility to have more of an influence in the regulating of this new technology before it is introduced into a society. This claim will be based upon a utilitarian view. The role of the government is to protect the best interests of the people it serves. Utilitarianism presents that the correct ethical action is based on the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people (Markovits, 2014).

One example of advancing technology is the introduction of self-driving cars. Although this concept has yet to be fully mastered, google is very close (Simonite, 2014). Some questions that are left unanswered are what happens when these cars hit the road? If an autonomous car causes an accident, who is at fault? What happens when the software is hacked?

In order to protect the greatest interest of the people, the government should step in and get these types of questions answered before allowing these cars into society. References Markovits, J. (2014, Sep 26). Philosophy – ethics: utilitarianism [video file]. Retrieved from Simonite, T. (2014) Lazy humans shaped Google’s new autonomous car. Retrieved from Source: Purchasing & Supply Management 15th Edn, Johnson and Flynn, pp. 108, .1 SITUATION ANALYSIS/ SAMPLE COVER PAGE FOR CASE STUDY REPORTS Name of Case Study Report: ___________________________ COURSE NUMBER AND NAME Name of Professor: ______________________ Due Date: __________ Name/ ID# of Team Members: _________ __________ _________ __________ _________ __________ _________ __________ _________ __________ 5.1 Situation Analysis/Size-Up/Assumptions The first activity that you should carry out is to read the material, identify and collect any necessary data/information and to provide structure to the resulting data. This activity takes place before you deal with the issue of the problem statement. In the size-up, you try to identify critical issues and to draw both logical and critical inferences from the resulting data.