The Information Below Is A Quote From The Office Of The Whis

The Information Below Is A Quote From The Office Of The Whistleblower

The information below is a quote from the Office of the Whistleblower at the Securities and Exchange Commission: Source: Let’s assume you have been hired as the fraud manager for a privately-held company whose main business is administering the disposition of assets left in estates for wealthy individuals in accordance with their Last Wills and Testaments. You have been asked by the audit committee to prepare an overall fraud prevention program for the business, including: assisting the marketing department in preparing written materials for family members explaining how they can report suspected fraud in estate asset dispositions. It is well known that family members don’t always get along while the disposition of assets in accordance with a Will is occurring.

It is an important service to the company’s clients that they know how to report potential fraud if they feel it may be occurring. Questions: Using private industry as a potential background for developing your fraud prevention and detection strategy, what type of external resource(s) would you recommend be established as soon as possible and included in the company’s marketing brochures as a value-added differentiating service with regards to reporting potential fraud that may be occurring in the asset disposition process? Keep in mind, this is not a SEC or a Securities Act situation. Assume after implementing the external resource described in #1 above, it comes to your attention that Bob, a member of the Jones’ family, may be improperly benefitting from the disposition of his late Dad’s assets by selling certain assets for significantly less than fair market value before the formal auction of tangible assets.

Per other family members, Bob has been acting very strange since his Dad’s passing. Large bags have appeared under his eyes, Bob has been very short and flown off the handle in just about every discussion or phone call with the other family members, and Bob is suddenly driving a brand-new Porsche after driving an old used Toyota for the last 15 years. What steps would you start with to investigate this suspected fraud before interviewing either Bob or any of the family members? After the first steps in your suspected fraud investigation are completed above, would you interview Bob? Why or why not?

Describe in detail how you would conduct an admission-seeking interview with Bob. Be specific. See the hyperlink below to Interview Theory and Application prepared by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners to help you prepare your detailed answer to this question. This is the most important part of your answer to this homework assignment:

Paper For Above instruction

Addressing fraud prevention and detection in estate asset disposition, particularly in privately held companies, requires comprehensive strategies to safeguard assets and ensure transparency. This paper explores external resources for fraud reporting, initial investigative steps for suspected fraud, and conducting effective admission-seeking interviews, exemplified through the case of a potentially fraudulent family member.

External Resources for Fraud Reporting and Prevention

In developing a robust fraud prevention program, establishing external reporting resources is essential. One recommended external resource is a dedicated anonymous fraud hotline managed by a reputable third-party provider. This hotline would serve as a confidential channel for family members and other stakeholders to report suspicious activities related to estate assets without fear of retaliation. Including information about this hotline in marketing brochures and estate documentation can enhance transparency and trust, positioning the company as proactive and client-centric. Such a resource aligns with best practices in private industry, where external whistleblowing mechanisms have been proven effective in encouraging disclosure and deterring fraud (ACFE, 2010).

Additional external resources might include partnerships with forensic accounting firms or fraud detection consultancies. These organizations can assist in early detection through data analysis, transaction testing, and risk assessments. Incorporating these partnerships as part of the service offering demonstrates a commitment to integrity and can serve as a unique value-added differentiator.

Initial Steps in Investigating Suspected Fraud

When suspicions arise—such as unusual asset sales or behavioral changes—the initial response involves gathering preliminary information without direct confrontation. First, reviewing all relevant documentation is crucial: estate files, transaction records, asset valuations, and communication logs. Conducting a thorough review helps identify anomalies or inconsistencies that warrant further investigation.

Next, deploying data analysis tools—such as forensic accounting software—can uncover irregularities in financial transactions, asset valuations, or transfer histories. Concurrently, interviewees—estate staff, legal advisors, or other trusted individuals—can be discreetly questioned to gather anecdotal evidence. These steps create a factual basis before deciding whether to proceed with interviewing the suspect directly.

Before interviewing Bob, it is prudent to establish probable cause. This involves aligning observed behavioral changes—such as his physical condition and financial signs—with the documented discrepancies. If sufficient evidence indicates potential wrongdoing, the case justifies a formal interview.

Interviewing Bob: Strategies and Approach

When conducting an admission-seeking interview with Bob, preparation is essential. Based on interview theory and application principles from the ACFE, the process begins with establishing rapport. Initiating the conversation in a non-confrontational manner helps reduce defensiveness, encouraging honesty. For example, the interviewer might start with casual questions about Bob's well-being since his father’s passing, demonstrating concern and concern for his comfort.

Next, the interviewer should clearly articulate the purpose of the interview, emphasizing a desire to understand and clarify any unusual circumstances. Using open-ended questions, such as “Can you tell me about how you've been feeling lately and your recent activities?” invites the subject to share information voluntarily.

As the interview progresses, the interviewer employs strategic silence, active listening, and probing questions—focused on inconsistent details. For instance, the interviewer may ask, “We noticed some recent changes in your assets and behavior. Can you explain these shifts?” The goal is to observe verbal and non-verbal cues that suggest deception or acknowledgment of misconduct.

Throughout the process, the interviewer must remain vigilant for signs of cognitive load or discomfort, such as hesitation, evasiveness, or conflicting statements. If the evidence suggests that Bob might be withholding information or admitting guilt, the interviewer can then move to a direct, fact-finding question: “Are there any transactions or circumstances regarding your father's estate that you believe we should clarify?”

Finally, if evidence points toward possible involvement, the interviewer should provide an opportunity for Bob to give a voluntary disclosure, framing the request calmly and confidently. For example, “If there's anything you’d like to share about these recent activities, now would be a good time.”

In conclusion, a systematic, respectful, and strategic approach grounded in interview theory enhances the likelihood of obtaining truthful admissions while maintaining ethical standards.

Conclusion

Implementing external fraud reporting mechanisms and conducting careful preliminary investigations are critical components of an effective fraud prevention strategy in private estate management. A combination of external resources like anonymous hotlines and forensic partnerships, coupled with methodical investigative procedures and expert interview techniques, provides a comprehensive defense against estate fraud. Such measures not only protect assets but also reinforce the company's reputation for integrity and client service excellence.

References

• Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2010). Fraud Examiners Manual. ACFE.
• Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., Albrecht, C. O., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2014). Fraud Examination. Cengage Learning.
• Herbert, J. (2015). Best practices in forensic interview techniques. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Studies, 2(3), 45-52.
• Rice, L. W., & Cherrington, D. J. (2004). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Wells, J. T. (2014). Principles of Fraud Examination. John Wiley & Sons.
• Longe, H. (2017). Ethical considerations in fraud investigations. Ethics & Compliance Journal, 9(2), 30-37.
• Batson, J. (2018). Fraud detection through data analytics. Internal Auditor, 75(6), 28-33.
• Vinten, G. (2016). Corporate governance and fraud prevention. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16(4), 657-666.
• Turner, R. (2019). Interviewing suspects: Techniques and strategies. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 21(2), 147-157.
• McNally, R., & Worthington, S. (2013). Effective communication strategies in forensic interviews. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 10(4), 276-288.