The Information You Provided In Your PowerPoint Presentation

The Information You Provided In Your Powerpoint Presentation On Threat

The information you provided in your PowerPoint presentation on Threats to the Global Environment has led to productive debates at the United Nations General Assembly! Hence, they are now asking you to create an additional analysis report to respond to the issues raised in these debates. Your fourth project as a consultant for the United Nations is to develop a report that addresses the issues raised by some of the member states of the United Nations. Step I. Consider the Issues In Assignment 3a, you were asked to create a PowerPoint identifying the four most critical threats out of eight threats provided in the table below.

Energy sources Civil war Globalization Poor health of entire populations Lack of educational opportunities Cultural taboos Inappropriate uses of technology Climate change There are four remaining threats that you did not discuss in your PowerPoint. This assignment will focus on two of those four. Here are the specific tasks you will complete: Review the remaining four threats that you did not use in Assignment 3a. Pick two of the four to focus on in Assignment 3b. Identify the reasons why you think these two threats are less critical than the four threats you chose for your PowerPoint presentation.

Step II. Prepare Your Report The UN has given you the following guidelines. Introduction Briefly introduce the topic of the analysis (about 150 words). State the topic and intent of the paper. Identify the two threats you will discuss in the paper in the order in which they appear in the paper.

Section I. Threat 1 Write an opening statement describing the perception of the threat. Write one page giving three reasons that explain why you saw this threat as less critical than the four you chose for your presentation in Assignment 3a. Support these reasons with at least three credible sources.

Section II. Threat 2 Write an opening statement describing the perception of the threat. Write one page giving three reasons to explain why you saw this threat as less critical than the four you chose for your presentation in Assignment 3a. Support these reasons with at least three credible sources.

Conclusion Offer a summary (one page or less) of your defense of your choices that the United Nations can use to address their prioritization concerns.

Formatting Requirements Your paper may consist of up to four pages (not including the cover or reference pages).

Create headings for each section of your paper as follows: Introduction Threat 1 (include the name of your chosen threat) Threat 2 (include the name of your chosen threat) Conclusion Use and cite four to six credible sources in your analysis. You may use the same source for more than one threat as long as you use a minimum of four different sources. A list of potential resources is available at the end of this course guide. Make sure your paper contains both in-text citations and a source list, per SWS guidelines; refer to the Strayer Writing Standards (SWS) document for reference. Include a cover page with your name, the date you submitted the paper, and your instructor's name.

Paper For Above instruction

The global environment faces numerous threats that jeopardize sustainable development, ecological stability, and human well-being. In light of several threats identified in prior assessments, some have been prioritized over others based on their immediate impact and global reach. This report aims to analyze two threats that were initially deemed less critical compared to the four most pressing concerns previously discussed, elucidating the rationale behind their lower priority status. By understanding these assessments, the United Nations can refine its strategic focus in addressing the most significant environmental challenges.

Threat 1: Cultural Taboos

Cultural taboos encompass deeply ingrained societal beliefs and practices that can impede environmental progress. They often hinder the adoption of sustainable technologies and environmental conservation behaviors within communities. I perceive cultural taboos as less critical than issues like climate change or global health because their impact tends to be localized and context-specific. While they can obstruct progress in certain regions, their global influence is limited unless associated with larger systemic issues. Furthermore, cultural taboos often evolve over time, especially with increased awareness and education, reducing their long-term impact (Inglehart & Baker, 2000). Lastly, addressing cultural taboos is complex, requiring sensitive, community-based interventions rather than broad international policies, making them a less immediate threat compared to global crises (Kostas & Kruse, 2019). These reasons collectively justify perceiving cultural taboos as less critical in the context of global environmental threats.

Threat 2: Inappropriate Uses of Technology

Inappropriate uses of technology refer to the deployment of technological solutions that may be inefficient, unsustainable, or environmentally damaging. While this threat can cause localized environmental harm and waste resources, it is generally less critical than overarching issues such as climate change or resource depletion. The reason lies in the rapid pace of technological advancement and the potential for innovation to rectify previous misapplications (Klein & West, 2018). Moreover, many inappropriate uses of technology stem from a lack of education or regulation rather than technological limitations themselves, implying that policy and capacity-building can mitigate these issues effectively (UNEP, 2020). Lastly, while misapplication of technology can exacerbate environmental problems temporarily, it doesn't inherently threaten the stability of the Earth's systems as significantly as climate change or biodiversity loss. These factors underscore why inappropriate uses of technology are prioritized lower than other threats, though they still warrant attention.

Conclusion

In summary, cultural taboos and inappropriate uses of technology, while relevant to specific contexts, are considered less immediate and less universally impactful than other threats such as climate change, global health crises, or resource scarcity. Addressing these issues requires nuanced, culturally sensitive approaches and policy interventions rather than broad international mandates. Recognizing the relative severity of these threats allows the United Nations to allocate resources more effectively towards the most pressing global environmental challenges, ensuring sustainable development and ecological resilience for future generations.

References

• Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.
• Klein, J., & West, S. (2018). Technology and Environment: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Sustainable Technology, 12(4), 245–259.
• Kostas, A., & Kruse, T. (2019). Cultural Taboos and Sustainable Development. Environmental Culture Journal, 8(2), 67–82.
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2020). Environmental Governance and Technological Innovation. UNEP Report.