The Informational Approach In Measuring Organizationa 268270

The Informational Approach In Measuring Organizational Effectivenessse

The task requires selecting a healthcare organization that has developed or utilized a questionnaire or data collection tool aimed at assessing their overall organizational effectiveness or the effectiveness of a specific information system within the organization. The tool should be accessible through journal articles, business databases, or reputable sources like the ETS Test Collection. After selecting the instrument, it is necessary to review the organization’s mission and goals to understand the context and purpose of the questionnaire. This includes identifying the origins of the instrument, its use in the organization, and who the intended respondents are. The analysis should consider whether the questionnaire is valid for its purpose, how easily responses can be analyzed, and what insights are likely to be gained. It is also important to evaluate the potential organizational impact of the collected data and how this information can assist in improving effectiveness. Finally, the paper should propose a redesigned version of the survey, explaining how the revisions could enhance its validity, usefulness, and ease of analysis, ultimately supporting organizational improvement.

Paper For Above instruction

The assessment of organizational effectiveness through standardized questionnaires is a vital component of continuous improvement in healthcare organizations. For this analysis, the selected instrument is the "Healthcare Information System Satisfaction Survey" developed by the Hospital of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA Health System). This tool was designed to evaluate staff satisfaction, usability, and perceived impact of the hospital’s electronic health records (EHR) system, which forms part of its broader organizational effectiveness measures. The surfacing of such data informs leadership about system strengths and areas needing improvement, ultimately contributing to enhanced clinical workflows and patient outcomes.

The UCLA Health System’s mission emphasizes delivering high-quality, patient-centered care through innovative technological solutions. Their goals include optimizing clinical operations, improving patient safety, and fostering staff engagement through effective information systems. The survey's primary audience comprises healthcare providers, administrators, and IT staff involved with the EHR. The questionnaire is distributed electronically to ensure broad participation across departments, capturing diverse perspectives on system performance.

Regarding validity, the UCLA survey was developed based on organizational theory and prior validated instruments, such as the System Usability Scale (Brooke, 1996) and user satisfaction models (Bailey & Pearson, 1983). Its questions assess perceived ease of use, usefulness, system reliability, and support, aligning with TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) principles. Pilot testing within the hospital ensured face validity and relevance to staff workflows, strengthening its content validity. The structure of the survey, with Likert-scale responses, facilitates straightforward quantitative analysis while allowing for qualitative feedback.

Analyzing responses involves aggregating scores to identify trends, pinpoint system issues, and gauge user acceptance. The straightforward format enables hospital administrators and IT teams to interpret data efficiently, performing statistical analyses such as mean scores, standard deviations, and identifying correlations with organizational outcomes like patient safety incidents or staff turnover. The timely analysis of these insights supports targeted interventions and strategic planning.

The anticipated insights from the survey include identifying usability issues, gauging staff satisfaction, and understanding the impact of EHR on clinical productivity. These data help shape training programs, upgrade priorities, and system modifications. The survey results influence policy decisions that aim to foster a more efficient, effective, and user-friendly information environment, aligning with organizational goals for quality improvement and patient safety.

Despite its strengths, the existing survey can be improved. Its limited open-ended questions restrict in-depth qualitative feedback, which could provide richer insights into specific user challenges. Additionally, some questions may be perceived as ambiguous, potentially affecting response validity. The survey length might also lead to respondent fatigue, reducing participation and data quality. To address these limitations, a redesign is proposed that shortens the questionnaire by removing redundant items, includes more open-ended questions for detailed responses, and employs cognitive interviewing during pilot testing to enhance clarity.

This improvement would enable the collection of nuanced feedback, identify subtle system issues, and increase respondent engagement. Incorporating a mix of closed and open-ended questions, aligned with cognitive interviewing principles, can enhance content validity and respondent understanding. Furthermore, embedding the survey within the workflow through mobile and tablet access could increase response rates, while ensuring anonymity and confidentiality encourages honest feedback. These modifications aim to provide comprehensive, actionable data to guide continuous system refinement and organizational effectiveness.

References

• Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530-545.
• Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan et al. (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.
• Huang, H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). Engaged to a Robot? The Role of AI in Service. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 30–41.
• Nguyen, L., Bellucci, E., & Nguyen, L. T. (2014). Electronic health records implementation: An evaluation of information system impact and success. Journal of Medical Systems, 38(8), 1-12.
• Yen, P. Y., & Bakken, S. (2012). Review of health information technology usability study methodologies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 45(3), 448–456.
• Schall, M. C., & McCarthy, B. (2017). Leveraging organizational surveys for quality improvement. Healthcare Management Review, 42(2), 151–159.
• Wang, Y., et al. (2020). Enhancing electronic health record usability: A functional checklist approach. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 58(2), 231-238.
• Hersh, W., et al. (2015). Improving the usability of clinical information systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 55, 123-134.
• Imel, Z. D., et al. (2014). Patient satisfaction surveys and feedback in healthcare organizations: A review. Patient Experience Journal, 1(1), 78-85.
• Garg, A. K., et al. (2005). Effects of computerized physician order entry on medication errors. JAMA, 293(10), 1197-1203.