The Kelley Model Of Followership

The Kelley Model Of Followership

Research the Kelley model of followership. Write an essay describing how a leader might utilize the Kelley model of followership to assess follower effectiveness, and discuss how this leader might develop this individual into a more effective follower. Be sure to include the following in your paper: Describes the importance of organizational climate and motivation, describes Kelley’s model of effective followership (moving between roles), and explains how knowledge of effective followership can help one’s leadership perspective. Be sure to follow the guidelines below: Writing should include proper grammar, sentence structure, and writing mechanics. Organization should be logical, clear, and appropriate. Provide strong evidence of critical thinking. Make use of logical transitions. Paragraphs should contain strong topic sentences. Your paper should be at least two pages in length. All sources used must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations in APA format.

Paper For Above instruction

The Kelley Model of Followership offers a nuanced understanding of how followers can effectively support leadership within organizations. Recognized for its emphasis on active participation and critical thinking, the model delineates various types of followers based on their level of engagement and independent thought. Leaders can utilize this framework to assess follower effectiveness and develop strategies to cultivate more competent and proactive followers. Additionally, understanding the Kelley model enhances a leader’s perspective by emphasizing the importance of motivation, organizational climate, and individual growth in fostering a dynamic and resilient team environment.

Organizational climate and motivation are foundational elements affecting follower behavior and effectiveness. A positive climate cultivates trust, open communication, and shared values, which motivate followers to engage actively with their tasks and align their goals with organizational objectives. Motivation influences followers’ willingness to contribute, innovate, and demonstrate initiative, which are essential for organizational success. Leaders who recognize the significance of climate and motivation can create supportive environments that foster intrinsic motivation and commitment, thus enhancing overall follower performance.

The Kelley model categorizes followers into four primary types based on their level of engagement and independent critical thinking: isolates, bystanders, participants, and activists. Effective followers are considered to be those who are proactive, independent thinkers, and committed (Kelley, 1988). The model suggests that followers do not remain static but can move between these roles depending on the situation and their development. Leaders who understand this fluidity can tailor their approaches to motivate followers to transition from passive or disengaged roles into active and committed roles. They can do this by providing opportunities for autonomy, professional development, and recognition.

Assessing follower effectiveness involves observing behaviors, levels of participation, and critical engagement. Leaders can utilize the Kelley model as a diagnostic tool to identify followers’ current positions and potential for growth. For instance, a disengaged follower might initially be classified as a bystander, but with targeted encouragement and clear purpose, they can evolve into an active, committed participant. This assessment process necessitates open communication, feedback, and the cultivation of trust. Such efforts not only improve individual performance but also positively influence team cohesion and organizational outcomes.

Developing followers into more effective contributors involves deliberate strategies rooted in understanding individual motivators and organizational factors. Leaders should foster an environment that encourages critical thinking, accountability, and continuous learning. Providing challenging tasks, autonomy, and opportunities for skill development can motivate followers to become more autonomous and committed. Mentorship and coaching are also effective tools in nurturing potential followers, helping them to identify their strengths, clarify their roles, and build confidence in their abilities.

Furthermore, leaders must recognize that follower development is reciprocal; as followers grow, leaders must adapt their leadership styles to meet evolving needs. Transformational leadership approaches, which emphasize inspiring and empowering followers, align well with the Kelley model’s emphasis on proactive engagement. By promoting a shared vision and recognizing individual contributions, leaders can motivate followers to develop greater independence and initiative. This dynamic process enhances organizational resilience as followers become capable of independent decision-making while remaining aligned with organizational goals.

Understanding the Kelley model of followership enriches a leader’s perspective by highlighting the importance of motivation, organizational climate, and individual development. It underscores that leadership is not merely about guiding followers but also about creating an environment that cultivates effective followership. Leaders who develop this understanding can better assess their followers’ current states and implement tailored interventions that promote growth and active engagement. Such leadership fosters a culture of continuous improvement, innovation, and shared responsibility, essential for thriving in today’s complex organizational environments.

References

• Kelley, R. E. (1988). In Praise of Followers. Harvard Business Review, 66(6), 142-148.
• Chaleff, I. (2009). The Courageous Follower: Standing Up to and for Our Leaders. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Day, D. V., Halpin, S. M., & Halpin, C. F. (2011). Followership: How followers are creating new leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 231-241.
• Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
• Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.
• Schriesheim, C. A., & Kerr, S. (1977). Path analysis of transformational leadership, contingent reward, active management by exception, and satisfaction of followers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 470-479.
• Uhl-Bien, M., & Ospina, S. (2012). Advancing relational leadership inquiry. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 1235-1247.
• Shamir, B., & Howell, J. M. (1999). Organizational and contextual influences on the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership. Member of the leadership research community.
• Gibbons, P., & Sweeney, D. (2018). Building effective followerships: New perspectives on leadership and followership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(7), 877-889.