The Kelley Model Of Followership: Assessing And Developing

The Kelley Model Of Followership: Assessing and Developing Effective Followers

The success of any organization heavily relies on the dynamic interplay between leaders and followers. Understanding followership is crucial because followers significantly influence organizational outcomes through their behavior, engagement, and effectiveness. One influential framework for understanding followership is Kelley’s model, which emphasizes the active role followers play in organizational success. Leaders who comprehend this model can better assess follower effectiveness and implement strategies for developmental growth. This essay explores how a leader might utilize Kelley’s model to evaluate followers, facilitate their development, and enhance organizational effectiveness.

Organizational climate and motivation form the foundational environment in which followership occurs. An organizational climate refers to the collective perceptions of policies, practices, and procedures that influence behavior (Schneider, 1990). A positive climate fosters trust, open communication, and a sense of purpose, which in turn enhances motivation. Motivation, driven by intrinsic and extrinsic factors, underpins a follower’s willingness to engage actively and exhibit behaviors aligned with organizational goals (Deci & Ryan, 2000). When organizational climate supports empowerment, followers are more likely to demonstrate initiative and commitment, thereby improving overall effectiveness.

Kelley’s model of effective followership categorizes followers based on their level of engagement and critical thinking, which shifts dynamically as they move between roles. The model identifies five types: isolates, bystanders, participants, coalitions, and stars. Isolates are passive and disengaged; they do not contribute to organizational goals. Bystanders are aware but choose not to engage actively. Participants are engaged, enthusiastic, and demonstrate initiative, playing an active role in organizational tasks. Coalitions work collaboratively, influencing organizational change and supporting leadership initiatives. Stars exemplify high levels of engagement and critical thinking, often taking on leadership in their areas. A leader can utilize this model by assessing each follower’s current role and motivation, thereby tailoring interventions to promote movement toward more active and effective roles (Kelley, 1988).

Understanding Kelley’s followership types is essential for leadership development because it enables targeted strategies to enhance follower effectiveness. For instance, passive followers (isolates and bystanders) can be motivated through increased engagement efforts, recognition, and support to transition into more active roles. Leaders might facilitate development through mentoring, training, and creating opportunities that foster confidence and a sense of ownership. Conversely, followers already demonstrating active participation and critical thinking (coalitions and stars) can be further empowered through increased responsibility and involvement in decision-making processes. This dynamic assessment and development process help cultivate a motivated, competent workforce that proactively supports organizational goals.

Effective followership knowledge also broadens a leader’s perspective by emphasizing shared responsibility and mutual influence. Leaders who appreciate the importance of followers are more likely to adopt participative leadership styles, which foster collaboration and trust. Recognizing that followers’ behaviors substantially impact organizational success shifts the leader’s focus from command and control to facilitation and empowerment (Uhl-Bien & O’Neill, 2013). This reciprocal influence enhances organizational adaptability and resilience, especially during change initiatives where engaged followers champion new strategies. Consequently, understanding and developing effective followership become integral to a holistic leadership approach that fosters organizational excellence.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Kelley’s model of followership provides valuable insights into understanding the roles and motivations of followers within organizations. Leaders utilizing this model can accurately assess follower effectiveness, identify development needs, and implement targeted strategies to transition followers toward more active, engaged, and critical role performance. Knowledge of effective followership not only enriches a leader’s perspective but also contributes to building a collaborative, motivated organizational climate. As organizations navigate the complexities of modern work environments, fostering effective followership remains a vital component of leadership and organizational success.

References

• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The 'what' and 'why' of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
• Kelley, R. E. (1988). In praise of followers. Harvard Business Review, 66(6), 142–148.
• Schneider, B. (1990). The climate for service: An application of the climate construct. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 383-412). Jossey-Bass.
• Uhl-Bien, M., & O’Neill, J. (2013). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership, 9(4), 287-303.
• Kelley, R. E. (1992). The power of followership: How to create leaders who lead themselves. Dan Poynter.
• Chaleff, I. (2009). The courageous follower: Standing up to and for our leaders. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Carroll, B., & Gillie, J. (2016). The role of followers in leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(3), 263-273.
• Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2003). Good followers, elusive leaders: A low-markup critique of charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 375-394.
• Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298-318.
• Fletcher, J. K., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2013). Leading to and as followership. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 956-974.