The Large Increase In Ionization Energy Needed To Remove Th

The Large In Crease In Ionization Energy Needed To Remove Th

Explain the large increase in ionization energy needed to remove the third electron from beryllium compared with that needed for the second electron.

The ionization energy refers to the amount of energy required to remove an electron from an atom or ion in the gaseous state. For beryllium (Be), the increase in ionization energy from the second to the third electron is particularly significant. This phenomenon is rooted in the electron configuration and the stability associated with filled electron shells. Beryllium’s electron configuration is 1s² 2s². When the second electron is removed, the atom attains a noble gas configuration (helium, 1s²), which is highly stable. Removing the third electron, however, involves removing an electron from a shell that already has a stable, complete octet, and also involves disrupting a filled 2s orbital. Consequently, this requires substantially more energy, which manifests as a large increase in ionization energy. This difference reflects the increasing effective nuclear charge experienced by electrons as inner shells are cleared, and the stability gained by noble gas electron configurations that makes subsequent ionization energetically unfavorable.

Paper For Above instruction

The phenomenon of a significant increase in ionization energy when removing successive electrons can be best exemplified by the element beryllium (Be). Understanding this transition in energy requires an examination of atomic structure, electron configuration, and nuclear attraction. Beryllium, with an atomic number of 4, has an electron configuration of 1s² 2s², indicating that its outermost electrons reside in the 2s orbital. When the first electron is removed, the energy required is relatively low because it disrupts a single, loosely held electron. The second removal, which results in a noble gas configuration (helium core), requires more energy due to the increased electrostatic attraction between the nucleus and the remaining electrons, and because it moves the atom toward greater stability.

However, the removal of a third electron from beryllium (which has only two electrons in its outermost shell) is not simply a matter of breaking a bond; it involves removing an electron from a stable, fully filled 2s orbital. This orbital is characterized by a high degree of stability owing to electron pairing and a complete shell. Since the electron-electron repulsion within the filled 2s orbital is minimized when electrons are paired, removing one of these electrons requires overcoming a substantial electrostatic barrier. Consequently, the ionization energy jumps significantly, illustrating the electron's preference to remain in its stable, paired configuration. This trend, where the ionization energy increases markedly after achieving a noble gas configuration, is a general principle observed across the periodic table.

Furthermore, the increase in ionization energy reflects the effective nuclear charge (Z_eff) experienced by electrons. As electrons are removed, the remaining electrons experience a stronger attraction to the nucleus, which makes subsequent ionization more energy-demanding. In the context of beryllium, the stark increase from the second to the third ionization energy underscores the transition from removing valence electrons to removing inner shell electrons, which are held more tightly due to the increased electrostatic attraction. This sharp increase is a common aspect of ionization energies among elements that reach noble gas configurations with successive removals, marking a shift from relatively easy to increasingly difficult ionization steps.

References

  • Atomic Structure and Periodic Trends. (2020). Journal of Chemical Education, 97(3), 735–741.
  • Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E., Bursten, B. E., Murphy, C., & Woodward, C. (2014). Chemistry: The Central Science (13th ed.). Pearson.
  • Fletcher, P., & Ryan, D. (2021). Periodic Trends in Ionization Energy. Chemistry World. https://www.chemistryworld.com
  • Housecroft, C. E., & Sharpe, A. G. (2012). Inorganic Chemistry (4th ed.). Pearson.
  • Petrucci, R. H., Herring, F. G., Madura, J. D., & Bissonnette, C. (2017). General Chemistry Principles & Modern Applications (11th ed.). Pearson.
  • Schaller, R. D. (2018). Principles of Chemistry. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Stewart, J. (2017). The Periodic Table and Electron Configurations. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(8), 1132–1135.
  • Zumdahl, S. S., & Zumdahl, S. A. (2020). Chemistry (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Wilkinson, G., & Kilpatrick, J. (2013). Bioinorganic Chemistry. Royal Society of Chemistry.
  • Yaws, C. L. (2013). The Yaws Hand Book of Physical Properties for Hydrocarbons and Chemicals. Gulf Publishing.

Related Assignments