The Level Production Strategy

The Level Production Strategya Level Production Strategy Relies On A C

The level production strategy relies on maintaining a constant output rate and capacity while adjusting inventory and backlog levels to meet fluctuating demand patterns. This approach aims to keep the workforce steady, avoid frequent capacity changes, and manage demand variability primarily through inventory management. This essay examines whether a pure service industry, such as accounting or law firms, can effectively implement this technique by analyzing the nature of service operations and their capacity management challenges.

Service industries, particularly accounting and law firms, differ significantly from manufacturing sectors where level production strategies are traditionally applied. In manufacturing, the production of goods can be scheduled and stockpiled in advance, creating inventory buffers that accommodate demand fluctuations. By contrast, service industries are highly reliant on human capital—skilled professionals whose work cannot be stored or stockpiled like physical goods. Therefore, implementing a strict level production strategy in these sectors presents unique challenges, although not entirely impossible.

Feasibility of Level Production Strategy in Service Industries

One of the core issues with applying a level production strategy in service industries is the intangible nature of the output. Unlike physical products, services often require timely delivery by trained professionals, and the capacity to perform these services is often constrained by the availability of skilled personnel. Consequently, maintaining a constant workforce and capacity might not translate seamlessly into a steady output without creating inefficiencies or compromising quality.

However, certain aspects of service firms can adapt to a form of level production. For example, accounting firms often experience seasonal peaks during tax season. To manage this, some firms build up a backlog during off-peak periods to handle the increased workload during peak times without hiring temporary staff or overextending their workforce in advance. This resembles inventory in manufacturing and allows the firm to smooth out fluctuations in demand, aligning with a modified version of level production (Wisner, Tan, & Leong, 2012).

Similarly, law firms may operate by maintaining a steady core staff and managing caseloads to match the anticipated or ongoing demand, effectively creating a backlog or buffer period to handle fluctuating workloads. This approach enables these firms to avoid frequent staffing changes and accommodates seasonal or cyclical demand variations, aligning with the principles of level production. Nonetheless, the inability to 'stockpile' professional hours remains a fundamental limitation.

Limitations and Challenges

The key limitation in applying pure level production in service industries is the inability to inventory human effort, which is inherently perishable and non-storable. Unlike manufactured goods, workforce capacity corresponds to real-time labor input, which cannot be saved or stored for future use. This distinguishes service sectors from manufacturing and requires alternative capacity management approaches, such as flexible staffing, overtime, or strategic use of backlog and scheduling (Naylor, 2004).

Flexible staffing arrangements, including part-time personnel, temporary workers, or overtime, are common methods that service firms employ to meet variable demand rather than maintaining a constant workforce. These practices can mitigate some of the challenges associated with fluctuating demand, but they also introduce costs and potential quality concerns if overused.

Another significant challenge is maintaining service quality and consistency during peak periods. Overloading staff or rushing work to clear backlogs may lead to mistakes or customer dissatisfaction. Therefore, while a form of level production—by smoothing workloads through backlog management—can be implemented, pure application in its traditional manufacturing sense remains impractical in service sectors.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a pure level production strategy, characterized by constant capacity and varying inventory levels, is challenging to implement in service industries like accounting and law firms. While these firms can adopt modified approaches that involve managing backlog and smoothing demand through strategic scheduling, they cannot fully emulate manufacturing's inventory-based buffer system due to the intangible, perishable nature of their output. Nonetheless, with tailored adjustments, service organizations can benefit from a similar philosophy, helping to stabilize workload, optimize resource utilization, and maintain service quality during demand fluctuations.

References

• Naylor, J. B. (2004). Managing capacity for service delivery. Operations Management Review, 16(4), 15-22.
• Wisner, J. D., Tan, K.-C., & Leong, G. (2012). Principles of Supply Chain Management (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
• Chase, R. B., Jacobs, F. R., & Aquilano, N. J. (2006). Operations Management for Competitive Advantage (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Operations Management (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Fitzsimmons, J. A., & Fitzsimmons, M. J. (2014). Service Management: Operations, Strategy, and Technology (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Grönroos, C. (2007). Service Management and Marketing: Customer Management in Service Competition. John Wiley & Sons.
• Lovelock, C., & Wirtz, J. (2016). Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Ballantyne, D., & Varey, R. J. (2006). Creating value-in-use through marketing practice. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 299-318.
• Johnston, R., & Clark, G. (2008). Service Operations Management. Pearson Education.
• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A restatement of research propositions about service quality. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 41-50.