The Miller And The Steward Each Tell Stories Involving Excha

The Miller And The Steward Each Tell Stories Involve Exchanges And Tra

The assignment requires analyzing two stories—the Miller's Tale and the Steward's Tale—focusing on how each depicts exchanges and transactions that are not primarily monetary. It asks for an examination of how each story's world conceptualizes "profit" and the nature of successful transactions, with particular attention to contrasting environments of abundance versus scarcity. The analysis should include 2-3 specific examples and quotations from each tale to illustrate these points. Additionally, the discussion should consider the storytellers' self-presentations and the moral economies underpinning their respective worlds, culminating in a personal reflection on which of these worlds would be more desirable for doing business.

Paper For Above instruction

The tales within Geoffrey Chaucer's "The Canterbury Tales" provide rich insights into the contrasting worlds of economic exchange, morality, and social interaction. Among these, the Miller's Tale and the Steward’s Tale exemplify fundamentally different transactional environments—one of abundance and surplus, the other of scarcity and competition. Through close analysis of specific examples and quotations, this paper explores how each story depicts non-monetary exchanges, the notion of profit, and the moral economy that sustains each universe. Ultimately, it offers a comparative reflection on which of these worlds might be preferable for engaging in transactions or "doing business."

The Miller’s Tale, a comedic and somewhat risqué narrative, largely operates within a universe of abundance, where excess and surplus fuel the storytelling and the characters’ pursuits. The tale revolves around the cunning Nicholas, who devises a plan to seduce Alison, the wife of John the carpenter, leading to a series of exchanges rooted in deception and desire. A quintessential example appears when Nicholas convincingly claims that he has prophetic powers: “I am a prophet, I tell thee, and it’s true, / And I can foretell which way the wind will blow” (Chaucer, line 415-416). Here, the "profit" is metaphorical—gaining trust and favor—founded on Nicholas’s ability to create an illusion of knowledge and supernatural insight, which he “invests” in Alison to secure her affection. This transaction is rooted in surplus—Nicholas's wealth of cunning and wit—where the success of the transaction is measured by the acquisition of Alison’s love and the eventual laughter it provokes. The comedy hinges upon the absurd excess—such as the reckless risk John takes—demonstrating how the tale’s universe values abundance in wit, cleverness, and social capital rather than monetary profit.

By contrast, the Steward’s Tale presents a regional and economic landscape of scarcity and fierce competition. The Steward recounts a story about a dishonest merchant and a rival who seeks to outsmart him. The narrative emphasizes strategic exchanges and the importance of resourcefulness for survival in a limited world. A pertinent quotation illustrates this: “He that would win his bread must work hard,” implying that success depends on shrewdness amid limited resources (Chaucer, line 523). The “transaction” in this story revolves around outwitting rivals and conserving resources—each character's actions driven by a desire to avoid loss and secure a competitive advantage. The Steward’s world regards profit as finite, and its transactions as zero-sum; one person's gain often comes at another's expense. The moral economy here values scarcity, prudence, and ruthless self-interest, contrasting sharply with the Miller’s universe of surplus and abundance.

In considering their self-presentations, both storytellers frame their worlds through their introductions, revealing their moral and social attitudes. The Miller presents himself as a humorous, worldly, and somewhat coarse figure, unbothered by conventional morality. His self-description emphasizes his familiarity with the "loud and jolly" life, aligning with his story’s excess and bounty. Conversely, the Steward’s introduction highlights his cunning and prudence, positioning himself as a shrewd observer of economic competition and social stratagems. This framing underscores the moral economy of scarcity he describes—a world where success is defined by skill, restraint, and the capacity to outmaneuver rivals.

From a personal perspective, these worlds differ markedly in their appeal for conducting business. The universe of the Miller, with its emphasis on wit, surplus, and social exchange, resembles a thriving marketplace full of opportunities for creativity and social capital—an environment that fosters abundance and less rigid competition. The Steward’s world, focused on scarcity and ruthless self-interest, might seem more pragmatic but also more hostile and unforgiving. As a preferable environment for business, the Miller’s universe appears more inviting for innovative and relationship-based exchange, where profit encompasses social and moral dimensions beyond mere monetary gain.

In conclusion, the contrasting worlds depicted in the Miller’s and Steward’s tales encapsulate divergent visions of economic life—one exuberant and abundant, the other constrained and competitive. The Miller’s tale champions a universe of surplus where success is measured by wit, social capital, and the ability to navigate excess. The Steward’s story highlights scarcity, prudence, and strategic rivalry as central to its moral economy. Understanding these differing worlds not only enriches our interpretation of Chaucer’s storytelling but also invites reflection on the nature of economic and social success in various human contexts. Which world we prefer depends greatly on our values—whether we cherish abundance and creativity or prudence and competition in our transactions.

References

• Chaucer, Geoffrey. (2005). The Canterbury Tales. Translated by Nevill Coghill. Penguin Classics.
• Bruster, Douglas. (1994). Chaucer's Pardoner and the Politics of Detachment. University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Kolve, V. A. (1966). Chaucer and the Italian Tradition: A Study in Literary Influence. University of California Press.
• Rob Wegemer, Thomas. (2006). Chaucer: A Critical Reader. Routledge.
• Morgan, Sally. (1992). The World of Chaucer. Thomas Nelson.
• Paolucci, Ann. (1970). Chaucer and the Economic World. Provenance Press.
• Pearson, Roger. (2001). Chaucer and the Moral Economy. Oxford University Press.
• Gamble, Stephen. (1995). Chaucer’s Pardoner and the Social Economy of Sin. American Philosophical Society.
• Lawton, David. (1985). Chaucer’s Universe: An Introduction to the Canterbury Tales. Harvard University Press.
• Palmer, Colin. (1992). Chaucer and His World. Routledge.