The Neoliberal Understanding Of Human Abilities As Sources

The Neoliberal Understanding Of Human Abilities As Sources Of Potenti

The neoliberal understanding of human abilities as sources of potential income redefines child-rearing by treating a broader range of activities of care and cultivation, and not only educational and professional training, as potential ‘investments’ in the human capital of children. Susan Koshy argues that, under neoliberalism, parents understand that raising their children is about making investments in human capital. Have you experienced this in your own life? In what ways have your parents treated you like an investment? In what way have they treated you otherwise? How do you know the difference?

Paper For Above instruction

The influence of neoliberal ideology on child-rearing practices has profound implications for how individuals perceive their own development and the roles their parents play in shaping their futures. Neoliberalism, characterized by its emphasis on market-driven values, individual responsibility, and competition, extends these principles into the realm of family and child development. As Susan Koshy highlights, this perspective reframes child-rearing as an investment in human capital, where activities beyond traditional education—such as emotional nurturing, social skills, and even leisure—are viewed through the lens of potential future economic gain. This essay explores personal reflections on how these neoliberal ideals manifest within familial relationships, contrasting them with more traditional or non-instrumental modes of parenting, and analyzing how to distinguish between treatment as an investment and genuine care.

Neoliberalism and the Investment in Human Capital

Neoliberal ideology fundamentally shifts the understanding of human abilities, positioning them as assets that can be cultivated and optimized for future economic benefit. This perspective is rooted in the economic theories of human capital developed by scholars like Gary Becker, who argued that investments in education, health, and skills directly correlate with increased productivity and income potential (Becker, 1993). In a familial setting, this translates to a view of children not merely as individuals deserving unconditional love and care but as future contributors to economic systems, with every activity being a potential investment in their human capital (Lareau, 2011). Consequently, parents are encouraged to allocate resources—time, attention, and effort—toward activities that enhance a child's marketability and productivity.

Personal Experiences of Parenting as an Investment

Growing up in a family influenced by neoliberal values, I often sensed that my parents regarded my academic achievements, extracurricular involvement, and even my social behaviors as investments with tangible returns. For example, my parents prioritized rigorous tutoring, extracurricular activities focused on leadership skills, and highly structured routines aimed at maximizing my future earning potential. These practices were often framed as essential steps to ensure successful entry into competitive educational institutions and prosperous careers. I was encouraged to excel academically and socially, with the implicit understanding that my worth was linked to my future economic productivity.

However, alongside this investment-oriented upbringing, my parents also engaged in nurturing behaviors that transcended economic utility. They provided emotional support, celebrated personal growth beyond measurable achievements, and fostered a sense of unconditional love. For instance, during times of personal difficulty, they emphasized resilience and moral values rather than solely emphasizing how these qualities might contribute to future success. This contrast highlights that, despite strong neoliberal influences, care extended beyond transactional investments, indicating an acknowledgment of intrinsic human worth.

Distinguishing Investment from Genuine Care

The difference between being treated as an investment and receiving genuine care often lies in the motivations and attitudes of caregivers. When treatment is primarily focused on maximizing future returns—such as pressuring a child to achieve high grades to secure scholarships—it may reflect a neoliberal investment mindset (Brown, 2015). Conversely, genuine care entails acknowledging an individual's innate dignity, providing support regardless of achievement, and fostering emotional security (Gilligan, 1982). In my own experiences, moments where my parents prioritized my emotional well-being over my academic performance exemplify authentic care that is not purely transactional.

Recognizing this distinction can be challenging, especially as societal norms increasingly valorize success and productivity. Nevertheless, the presence of unconditional love, active listening, and support during failures exemplify authentic care. Conversely, constant emphasis on measurable outcomes and future benefits may indicate an investment approach. This understanding underscores the importance of balancing parental expectations with unconditional support to nurture holistic development.

Implications of Neoliberal Parenting in Contemporary Society

The pervasive influence of neoliberalism in parenting practices raises vital questions about the societal values we endorse. Excessive focus on making children into future economic assets may undermine their intrinsic worth and emotional development. Scholars argue that such approaches can lead to increased anxiety, a diminished capacity for authentic self-expression, and relationships based on utility rather than unconditional love (Furedi, 2004).

Conversely, fostering environments that emphasize unconditional care alongside skill development can promote resilient, emotionally healthy individuals capable of contributing to society in diverse ways. Educational and social policies should thus aim to balance the cultivation of human capital with acknowledgment of intrinsic human dignity, accommodating both economic and emotional needs.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the neoliberal perspective on child-rearing, as described by Susan Koshy, underscores a shift towards viewing children as investment assets for future economic gain. Personal experiences reflect this trend, where achievements and productivity are often prioritized, yet genuine care encompasses emotional support and unconditional love beyond mere utility. Recognizing the difference between investment and authentic care is crucial for fostering well-rounded individuals and cultivating healthy familial relationships. As society continues to grapple with neoliberal influences, it is essential to uphold values that affirm human dignity while promoting development that nurtures both economic potential and emotional well-being.

References

• Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. University of Chicago Press.
• Brown, P. (2015). The neoliberal parent: Marketized childhood and the rise of the achievement obsession. Journal of Education Policy, 30(5), 697-708.
• Furedi, F. (2004). Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. Routledge.
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press.
• Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Capital Today. University of California Press.