The Origins Of The Conflict Regarding Headscarves And Hijab

The Origins Of The Conflict Regarding Headscarves Hijab Or Tesettur

The origins of the conflict regarding headscarves (hijab or tesettur) have their roots in the very beginning of modern Turkish history. In the aftermath of World War I, the Ottoman Empire collapsed, and new political boundaries and ideologies emerged. The Treaty of Sevres in 1920 dismantled the Ottoman territories, leading to the Turkish War of Independence and the eventual establishment of the Republic of Turkey in 1923 under Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Atatürk aimed to modernize Turkey along Western lines, emphasizing secularism, nationalism, and reforms that distanced the state from Islamic traditions (Smith, 2008). His policies included adopting the Latin alphabet, banning traditional Ottoman attire like the fez, and prohibiting the Islamic veil for women, which symbolized a broader effort to secularize and Westernize the country (Women and the Veil, 2002).

This move to secularism was motivated partly by a desire to modernize and integrate with Western nations, but also by the geopolitical position of Turkey, which straddles Europe and Asia and has historically been a crossroads of conflict and influence. During the Cold War, Turkey aligned more with the West, joining NATO and adopting policies that further distanced itself from Islamic cultural practices. However, these reforms also fostered internal tensions, especially regarding the visibility of Islamic identity in public life (Held & Cummings, 2014).

In the 1980s and 1990s, political Islam began gaining traction, often in opposition to secularist policies. Parties like the Welfare Party, led by Necmettin Erbakan, gained significant electoral support, suggesting a societal desire for more religious expression in public life. The military, which perceived Islamist movements as a threat to secularism, intervened on several occasions, notably in 1997 during what was called a “soft coup,” removing Erbakan from power. Concurrently, women wearing headscarves faced discrimination and restrictions, such as being ejected from universities and institutions, reflecting the ongoing clash between religious and secular values (Shively, 2005).

One of the most iconic incidents was the case of Merve Kavakci, an elected parliamentarian who was barred from taking her oath of office because she refused to remove her headscarf. This incident became a symbolic flashpoint, illustrating the deep-seated divisions over religious expression and state secularism. Kavakci argued that her headscarf was a personal choice, not a political act, and that the restriction was an infringement on religious freedom (Kavakci, 2002). Critics contend that such policies disproportionately suppress religious expression of Muslim women and serve to uphold a secularist narrative that marginalizes Islamic identities.

In recent years, the debate over headscarves has remained intensely politicized. In 2013, the ban on wearing headscarves in public institutions was lifted, a move lauded by Prime Minister Erdoğan and his AK Party as restoring religious freedom. However, opponents view this as a step toward the Islamization of Turkey, risking the country’s secular foundations and provoking fears of increased male dominance and fundamentalist influence. This struggle highlights a broader tension within Turkish society: the desire to preserve secularism while respecting religious individual rights (Pamuk, 2013).

The symbolism of the headscarf extends beyond politics into questions about identity, gender equality, and cultural authenticity. While some argue it signifies religious devotion and cultural tradition, others see it as a symbol of societal pressure or male control. The decision to wear a headscarf should be a matter of personal choice; however, societal and political debates often frame it as an indicator of loyalty, modernity, or backwardness. Similar international debates occur in countries like France, where bans on face coverings aim to uphold secular values and security concerns—yet question whether such policies infringe on religious freedoms (Weekly Telegraph, 2014).

In Turkey, the issue is complicated further by the country’s dual identity as a secular republic founded on Kemalist principles and a predominantly Muslim population with diverse views on religious expression. The ongoing re-evaluation of headscarf policies demonstrates the country’s internal struggle between secular liberalism and religious tradition. If the practice is genuinely individual, it should be protected as a freedom of religion and expression. Conversely, if it is used as a façade for deeper political and social agendas, the conflict points to unresolved issues of power and identity within Turkish society (Finkel, 2012).

The current debates reveal that the core of the headscarf conflict is rooted in the broader struggle over Turkey’s direction—whether it remains committed to secular principles or moves toward a more religiously inclined society. The legal and political battles over this issue resonate globally, highlighting how symbols like the headscarf can embody complex layers of cultural, religious, and political meanings. Ultimately, respecting personal choice and ensuring individual freedoms should be central in addressing this contentious issue, allowing Turkey to reconcile its modern identity with its cultural and religious heritage (Ghosh, 2012).

Paper For Above instruction

The conflict over headscarves in Turkey encapsulates a broader debate about national identity, secularism, and religious expression. Rooted in the foundational reforms of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, who sought to secularize Turkey and align it with Western modernity, the controversy has persisted through decades of political and social change. Atatürk’s reforms, including the banning of the Islamic veil and the adoption of Western dress codes, symbolized a rejection of Ottoman-Islamic traditions in favor of secular nationalism. These policies aimed to forge a distinctly modern Turkish identity, aligning with Europe and distancing from Islamic cultural practices. However, these reforms also generated resistance, particularly among conservative and religious segments of the population who saw them as an erosion of Islamic values and cultural heritage.

The geographical and geopolitical significance of Turkey has further shaped its cultural policies. Positioned at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, Turkey has historically been a strategic player in regional and global politics. During the Cold War, Turkey’s shift toward the West and its membership in NATO formalized its alignment with secularist Western powers. Despite this, the societal fabric remained divided over the issue of religious expression, exemplified by restrictions on women wearing headscarves in public institutions and universities, which were seen as symbols of secular dominance at odds with religious identities. The case of Merve Kavakci, an elected parliamentarian barred from taking her oath because of her headscarf, exemplifies this tension—where religious symbolism becomes a political battleground (Shively, 2005).

The rise of political Islam in Turkey during the 1980s and 1990s introduced new dynamics to the debate. Parties like the Welfare Party gained electoral support, reflecting a society increasingly seeking religious expression within the political sphere. The military’s intervention to halt the Islamic movement, exemplified by the 1997 “soft coup,” represented the ongoing struggle between secular institutions and religious political forces. The subsequent lifting of the headscarf ban in 2013 by the AK Party, led by Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, marked a turning point, seen by supporters as restoring religious rights and personal freedom but also criticized for potentially undermining secular principles (Pamuk, 2013).

Internationally, Turkey’s headscarf debate resonates with similar conflicts over religious dress in Europe and North America. Countries like France, Belgium, and the UK have enacted laws restricting face coverings and veils in public to promote secularism or security, often citing women’s rights or societal cohesion. France’s ban on the burqa and niqab, upheld by the European Court of Human Rights, reflects fears of societal division and security concerns (Weekly Telegraph, 2014). Turkey’s approach has been more permissive, emphasizing individual freedom within the context of religious and cultural expression, though the political debate remains contentious. The question of whether the headscarf symbolizes religious devotion, cultural identity, societal pressure, or political allegiance remains central to this ongoing controversy.

The core issue revolves around personal autonomy versus societal standards, and whether religious dress like the headscarf should be viewed as a matter of individual choice or a symbol manipulated for political or social control. Many women who wear the headscarf perceive it as an expression of faith and identity rather than rebellion or resistance. For others, it may be influenced by community norms or familial pressure. The debate highlights the importance of respecting individual freedoms—particularly the right to religious and cultural expression—while balancing societal interests in secularism and gender equality (Finkel, 2012).

The Turkish case exemplifies the complexity of accommodating religious traditions within a modern, secular state. While Kemalist reforms aimed to eliminate religious influence from public life, ongoing social and political changes show that religious identity remains a powerful and resilient aspect of Turkish society. Recognizing that headscarf policies can serve as both symbols of religious freedom and political power struggles is crucial. To foster social harmony and inclusion, policies focusing on individual choice, non-coercion, and respect for cultural diversity are essential. Ultimately, Turkey’s challenge is to integrate its secularist principles with respect for religious identity, allowing personal freedom to flourish without conflict (Ghosh, 2012).

References

• Ghosh, B. (2012). The New Middle East, After the Arab Spring a Different World Unfolds. New York, NY: Time Books.
• Held, C. C., & Cummings, J. T. (2014). Middle East Patterns: Places, Peoples, and Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Kavakci, M. (2002). Turkey's Fashion Police. Foreign Policy. Washington Post.
• Pamuk, H. (2013). Repeal of Headscarf Ban. Retrieved July 16, 2014, from [source URL].
• Shively, K. (2005). Religious Bodies and the Secular State: The Merve Kavakci Affair. Journal of Middle East Women's Studies. Indiana University Press.
• Smith, D. (2008). The State of the Middle East: An Atlas of Conflict and Resolution. California: University of California Press.
• Weekly Telegraph. (2014). France’s burka ban doesn’t breach rights, rules Strasbourg. July 9-15, 2014.
• Women and the Veil. (2002). [Publisher].
• Hirst, S. J. (2013). Anti-Westernism on the European Periphery: The Meaning of Soviet-Turkish Convergence in the 1930s. Slavic Review, 72(1), 32-53.
• Clinton, W. J. (2004). My Life. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.