The Paper Should Be An Argumentative Paper That Is You Shoul

The Paper Should Be An Argumentative Paper That Is You Should Expa

The paper should be an “argumentative” paper, where you expand on a topic, point, or thesis, and support it with evidence and reasoning. It is important to understand that an argumentative paper does not necessarily mean you will simply argue a position; rather, you will develop a thesis framed as a question and provide supporting arguments for it. For example, instead of just describing Erickson’s stages of development, you might ask, “Were Erickson’s own struggles with identity part of his motivation for his theory?”

Your task is to select a topic related to the course material, develop a clear thesis in the form of a question, and support your position with logical arguments, considering counterarguments as well. A well-structured paper includes an introduction, a main body divided into sections as needed, and a conclusion that summarizes the main points and addresses the opposing perspectives. In addition, your paper must follow APA style guidelines, including a short abstract, in-text citations, and a reference list of 3 to 5 scholarly sources.

The minimum length for your paper is 2,000 words, excluding the title page, abstract, and references. The paper should include the following sections, formatted appropriately in APA style: Title Page, Abstract, Introduction, Main Body, and Conclusion. If you are unfamiliar with APA format, consulting your librarian or style guide is recommended.

Possible topics include issues related to identity, the self, gender, personal growth, psychopathology, personality development, stress and resilience, philosophical questions about personhood and self-actualization, interpersonal relationships, love and altruism, death and dying, spirituality, life analysis, or ways to improve quality of life through values and work. While you may choose a different topic, ensure it is relevant to the course’s objectives. Fringe topics such as UFOs are discouraged; please consult your instructor if uncertain.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of an argumentative academic paper requires careful selection and framing of a central question or thesis that invites exploration and supported discussion. In this context, choosing a meaningful and relevant topic is crucial. For example, a student interested in self-actualization might pose the question, “Does self-actualization require overcoming inherent societal and personal barriers?” This question can then be explored through supporting arguments, counterarguments, empirical evidence, and philosophical perspectives.

Structuring the paper effectively entails an engaging introduction that clarifies the research question and outlines the thesis. The main body should be organized into coherent sections that develop arguments systematically, addressing various perspectives, evidence, and counterpoints. For instance, one section might explore theoretical frameworks, while another discusses empirical findings, and yet another examines practical implications. Incorporating scholarly sources solidifies the analysis and demonstrates academic rigor.

In the conclusion, synthesizing the arguments and highlighting the significance of the findings are essential. This section should reflect on the strength of the thesis, acknowledge limitations or counterarguments, and suggest avenues for further inquiry or practical application. Finally, adhering to APA guidelines ensures clarity, consistency, and scholarly credibility.

By grounding the argument in reputable sources and maintaining a logical flow, such a paper not only advances knowledge but also refines critical thinking and analytical skills. Choosing topics rooted in psychological theories, philosophical questions, or personal development helps ensure relevance and depth. Ultimately, an effective argumentative paper serves to deepen understanding of complex issues related to identity, growth, or human experience, contributing meaningfully to academic discourse.

References

• Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
• Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
• Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. Delacorte Press.
• Frankl, V. E. (1946). Man's search for meaning. Beacon Press.