The Perils And Pitfalls Of Leading Change

The Perils And Pitfalls Of Leading Change

Read The Article Titledthe Perils And Pitfalls Of Leading Change

Analyze the change implemented by Daniel Oliveira based on Kotter’s eight steps for leading change. Determine if Oliveira followed the Kotter model. Select one step to assess whether Oliveira accomplished it, explaining its importance and how adherence to the model could have contributed to the change's success. Respond to this analysis by discussing the specific step of Oliveira’s implementation, especially focusing on how he managed obstacles and resistance, and how following Kotter’s steps might have improved the outcome.

Paper For Above instruction

The article "The Perils and Pitfalls of Leading Change" highlights the complexities and potential challenges faced by leaders undertaking organizational change initiatives. Daniel Oliveira's attempt to implement change within his organization provides a valuable case study through the lens of Kotter’s eight-step change model, a widely recognized framework for successfully navigating transformational change (Kotter, 1996). Analyzing Oliveira’s approach in this context reveals both alignments and deviations from this strategic model, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive change management protocols.

Initially, Oliveira demonstrated an understanding of the importance of creating a sense of urgency, which is the first step in Kotter’s model. This sense of urgency was essential to motivate staff and garner initial support for the change. However, his subsequent actions suggest gaps in following through with the remaining steps, particularly those related to consolidating gains and anchoring new approaches into organizational culture. The failure to fully adhere to these steps led to resistance, especially by managers who, once Oliveira left to oversee other departments, ceased supporting the change initiatives.

Focusing on one critical step—step number five, 'removing obstacles'—offers insight into the challenges Oliveira faced and how addressing this step more effectively might have enhanced the change effort. According to Management Study Guide (2018), removing obstacles involves identifying and eliminating barriers that hinder progress, including resisting individuals or structural impediments. Oliveira’s approach appears to have fallen short in this regard because his managers resisted compliance with the new processes, reverting to old routines in Oliveira’s absence. This resistance can be understood as an obstacle that undercut the sustainability of the change initiative.

Oliveira’s strategy for removing obstacles should have included proactive actions such as engaging managers early in the process, defining clear consequences for non-compliance, and empowering change advocates within the team. Had he established accountability measures and fostered ownership among managers, resistance could have been minimized. Management literature emphasizes that leadership from the top must involve addressing resistance directly by communicating the importance of the change, aligning incentives, and creating a coalition of change agents (Appelbaum et al., 2012).

Furthermore, Oliveira's failure to cultivate a guiding coalition, as outlined in step two, compounded the resistance issue. Developing a coalition of influential leaders could have provided the necessary support to enforce changes and inspire others to follow suit. Creating short-term wins, another crucial step (step six), could also have reinforced the message that change was effective and beneficial, thereby reducing resistance over time (Kotter, 1998).

In conclusion, fully implementing Kotter’s model could have mitigated resistance and enhanced the sustainability of Oliveira’s change initiatives. Recognizing obstacles early and systematically addressing them is paramount. Leadership must not only initiate change but also embed it into the organizational fabric, ensuring ongoing commitment. Oliveira’s experience suggests that skipping or inadequately executing critical steps—particularly removing obstacles and building guiding coalitions—can jeopardize success. Adherence to the complete model fosters stronger buy-in, smoother transitions, and ultimately, more successful organizational change.

References

• Appelbaum, S. H., Habashy, S., Malo, J., & Shlonsky, A. (2012). Back to the future: Revisiting Kotter's 8-step change model. Journal of Management Development, 31(8), 764-782.
• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Kotter, J. P. (1998). Mastering the tough parts of change. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 130-138.
• Management Study Guide. (2018). Kotter's 8 Step Change Model. Retrieved from https://www.managementstudyguide.com
• Clarke, M. (2019). Overcoming resistance to change. Journal of Change Management, 19(3), 201-220.
• Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 133-141.
• Hayes, J. (2018). The Theory and Practice of Change Management. Palgrave.
• Burnes, B. (2017). Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organizational Dynamics. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 358-365.
• Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2009). Reflections: reinforcing change: An evidence-based approach to organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(5), 510-517.
• Kotter, J. P. (2007). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 85(1), 96-103.