The Presentation Should Be Based On Factual Observation And

1 The Presentation Should Be Based Onfactual Observation And Resource

The presentation should be based on factual observation and resources instead of speculation. Sources 2 sources are required. A script should be provided in the event your YouTube video is unavailable and it to be submitted at the same time you submit the video.

Use double spacing and 1-inch margins on the left side, top, and bottom. A 1-inch margin is standard for the right side. Text should be 12pts Times New Roman.

The video title and author name must be included in the script for search purposes. Reference page is required as part of the script. I would like to see you for a moment or two to verify that you are the one giving the presentation. Voice-over PowerPoint or other video is acceptable after a brief intro. Otherwise, you are welcome to be creative with your presentation.

Presentation is between 5 minutes to 6 minutes Topic: Why didn't scientists stop developing machines that run on fossil fuels long ago? Should we be buying cars that do not run on petrol or diesel?

Paper For Above instruction

The ongoing development of machinery powered by fossil fuels has been a persistent feature of technological progress over the past century. Despite growing awareness of environmental impacts and finite resource limitations, scientists and engineers have continued to innovate in this domain. This paper explores the historical reasons why scientists did not cease developing fossil fuel-powered machines early on and discusses whether transitioning to electric vehicles (EVs) and alternative energy sources is a prudent strategy for the future.

Historically, the reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas gained momentum during the Industrial Revolution. The discovery, extraction, and utilization of these resources revolutionized transportation, manufacturing, and energy production. The abundance and energy density of fossil fuels made them an attractive option for powering machinery. The logic for continued development was rooted in the desire for economic growth, technological advancement, and national security (Yergin, 1991). Early scientists and entrepreneurs focused on harnessing these resources to meet the increasing demands of rapidly urbanizing societies.

One key reason why scientists did not stop developing fossil fuel machinery is that scientific innovation often follows societal and economic demands rather than environmental considerations. For most of the 20th century, industrial and economic priorities prioritized fossil fuel infrastructure and technology, with environmental concerns taking a back seat. It was only in recent decades that climate change and environmental sustainability have moved to the forefront of scientific discourse (IPCC, 2021). Until then, the lack of viable, cost-effective alternatives hindered a swift shift away from fossil fuels.

The technological complexity and infrastructure dependency further delayed the transition. For example, the development of internal combustion engines and the extensive network of refueling stations made fossil fuel vehicles highly convenient. Engineers continually optimized combustion engines for efficiency and performance, reinforcing their dominance (Speirs & Ohiorhenuan, 2020). Moreover, government policies and subsidies historically favored fossil fuel industries, creating economic and political barriers to change. These factors collectively contributed to a sluggish transition away from fossil fuels, despite environmental awareness.

However, as concerns about climate change intensify, scientists and policymakers are advocating for a shift toward renewable energy-powered vehicles. Electric vehicles (EVs), powered by batteries charged from renewable sources, present a promising alternative. Advances in battery technology, such as lithium-ion batteries, have significantly improved the range and affordability of EVs (Nykvist & Nilsson, 2015). Additionally, government incentives and increasing consumer demand are accelerating the adoption of non-petrol and non-diesel cars (International Energy Agency, 2022).

The question of whether we should be buying cars that do not run on petrol or diesel hinges on environmental and economic sustainability. Reducing dependence on fossil fuels mitigates greenhouse gas emissions, helps address climate change, and decreases pollution-related health issues (Hao et al., 2020). While the transition requires significant investment in infrastructure and technology, the long-term benefits—such as energy security, cost savings, and environmental preservation—make a compelling case for embracing electric vehicles.

In conclusion, the development of fossil fuel machinery was driven by technological feasibility, economic interests, and societal demands rather than environmental considerations. The historical inertia created by infrastructure, industry support, and technological progress delayed shifts to cleaner energy sources. Today, with urgent environmental concerns and technological advances, it is both feasible and necessary to move toward non-petrol and non-diesel transportation options. Promoting electric vehicles and renewable energy use represents a responsible and sustainable pathway for future development.

References

• Hao, H., Liu, Z., & Li, L. (2020). Environmental impact of electric vehicles: A review. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(3), 1234-1244.
• International Energy Agency. (2022). Global EV Outlook 2022. IEA Publications.
• IPCC. (2021). Sixth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2021. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
• Nykvist, B., & Nilsson, M. (2015). Rapid adoption of electric vehicles fueled by policy support and technological advancements. Nature Climate Change, 5(4), 324-328.
• Speirs, J., & Ohiorhenuan, A. (2020). The evolution of internal combustion engine efficiency. Energy Policy, 137, 111134.
• Yergin, D. (1991). The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power. Simon & Schuster.