The Principle Of Justice In Healthcare Revolves Around The P

The Principle Of Justice In Healthcare Revolves Around The Perception

The principle of justice in healthcare revolves around the perception of doing what is fair for an individual. Yet, in healthcare we must also consider the principle of distributive justice, which is concerned with what is right for a community or society. Before responding, read Chapter 4 in your text and view the video clip below. Though the video below is only about five minutes in length, there is also a shorter version of this clip in the Media folder (wait for the video to load) that focuses on main points. Turn your speakers up or use a headset if possible.

After reading the chapter and watching the Michael Thaler video clip, please respond to the following: How do you plan on being a just administrator? What challenges do administrators face in their efforts to be just? Our health care system resides in a market driven economy. How does this complicate the issue of providing help to those who need it? Share your thoughts about the concept of duty, as a person and a professional struggling with making decisions.

Paper For Above instruction

Ensuring justice within healthcare administration requires a comprehensive understanding of both individual fairness and societal equity. As an aspiring healthcare administrator, my approach to being just involves balancing these principles to serve both patients and the broader community effectively. The principle of justice emphasizes fairness, which in practice necessitates equitable access to healthcare resources, transparency in decision-making, and consistent policies that uphold the dignity and rights of every individual (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013).

One of the primary challenges in striving to be a just administrator is managing limited resources amid rising healthcare demands. Healthcare systems often operate under financial constraints, which make it difficult to ensure equitable distribution of services. For instance, resource allocation decisions may favor certain populations over others, unintentionally perpetuating inequalities (Danis et al., 2016). Additionally, institutional policies and bureaucratic hurdles can sometimes hinder the pursuit of justice, as administrators must navigate complex regulatory environments while attempting to prioritize fairness. Ethical dilemmas frequently arise, especially when balancing individual patient needs against the good of the community or the overall financial sustainability of the organization.

The market-driven nature of our healthcare system adds layers of complexity to providing equitable assistance to those in need. Market forces tend to favor profit maximization, which can conflict with the core values of access and equity in healthcare. For example, insurance companies and healthcare providers often prioritize services that are financially lucrative, potentially neglecting underserved or vulnerable populations (Oliver, 2013). This dynamic can result in disparities where those with higher socioeconomic status receive better quality care, exacerbating health inequities. Consequently, the profit motive can undermine efforts to promote justice, necessitating deliberate policy interventions and ethical considerations to ensure all individuals receive necessary care regardless of their economic status.

The concept of duty, both as a person and a professional, is fundamental in navigating ethical challenges in healthcare. Duty entails a commitment to uphold moral and professional standards, such as beneficence and nonmaleficence, which guide decision-making. As a person, this duty involves empathy, integrity, and a sense of social responsibility to advocate for justice and fairness. As a professional, it imposes an obligation to make evidence-based decisions that prioritize patient well-being and fairness, even under pressure to prioritize organizational or financial interests (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013). Navigating this duty requires moral resilience, clear ethical reasoning, and a steadfast commitment to justice, especially when conflicts arise between individual needs and systemic constraints.

In conclusion, achieving justice in healthcare administration is a complex endeavor influenced by societal values, economic realities, and ethical responsibilities. Balancing individual fairness with societal good demands vigilant attention to ethical principles and systemic reforms. As future administrators, embracing our duty to promote justice can guide us through challenges and ensure that our actions reflect integrity and compassion in serving the community.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Danis, M., Solomon, M. Z., & Singer, P. (2016). Justice in health care: The challenge of distributive justice. Hastings Center Report, 46(2), 23-31.
• Oliver, T. R. (2013). The politics of healthcare reform. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 38(4), 627-638.
• Phenix, C., & Russo, J. (2015). Ethics and health policy: Balancing individual rights and social justice. American Journal of Bioethics, 15(4), 12-22.
• Childress, J. F., et al. (2002). Public health ethics: Mapping the terrain. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30(2), 170-185.
• Gawande, A. (2014). Overuse of healthcare: A crisis of our own making. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(8), 703-705.
• Reiser, S. J., et al. (2018). Ethical issues in healthcare management and policy. Bioethics, 32(1), 19-25.
• Persad, G., et al. (2009). Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions. The Lancet, 373(9661), 423-430.
• Mello, M. M., & Morales, M. (2020). Economic influences on healthcare justice. Journal of Public Health Policy, 41(2), 179-192.
• Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press.