The Professional Educator And Technology Assessment

The Professional Educator And Technology Assessm

Proethica Module 6 – The Professional Educator and Technology (Assessment Questions and Answers)

Question 1 of 12: A vice principal, Mr. Chiaro, notices that teachers and administrators freely email student information without established procedures. Which action should he take?

- Allow the practice to continue since no problems have arisen.

- Advocate for new procedures and guidelines for responsible use of student information.

- Restrict email communication about students and require staff to attend training on proper email use.

Question 2 of 12: Dr. Clayfin showed her email inbox on a classroom display, unaware students saw the contact name and avatar. The students later contacted the individual online. Which ethical principle was most at risk?

- Ensuring third-party rights are protected through technology.

- Identifying and reporting inappropriate electronic materials.

- Promoting appropriate technological applications for students' needs.

Question 3 of 12: Dr. Davis observes students looking at Beth’s phone, revealing messages from an adult male asking Beth to meet. She learns Beth plans to ignore these. What principle should guide her?

- Monitor and report cyberbullying incidents.

- Respect online privacy unless harm is evident.

- Avoid interference due to multiple relationships impairing objectivity.

Question 4 of 12: Ms. Golff notices students playing educational games on smartphones during lunch. Which action best supports educational technology use?

- Downloading and playing the games with students.

- Creating a list of favorite games for the class.

- Providing a list of educational games for practice.

Question 5 of 12: Mr. Clark finds a male student shared explicit images with a female student. What action best ensures the female student's safety?

- Telling the male student that his actions are inappropriate.

- Reporting to school administrators.

- Asking the female student to forward the images for investigation.

Question 6 of 12: Mr. Mathis notices a student editing photos with humorous alterations of classmates. Although not disruptive, he monitors the activity. Which ethical principle is most aligned?

- Recognizing and reporting inappropriate electronic images.

- Preventing plagiarism in digital creations.

- Staying updated on technological trends.

Question 7 of 12: Ms. Bilson, after leaving her district position, asks colleagues for student records via email. What should the teachers do?

- Email the records directly.

- Seek parental consent before sharing.

- Encourage her to contact the district for guidance.

Question 8 of 12: Ms. Kline learns from parents about online bullying affecting her student Kate. During the school meeting, Sally claims the bullying did not happen at school. What does this reveal?

- Sally is unaware that the school monitors all student online activities.

- Ms. Kline has an obligation to address online bullying affecting students.

- The teachers' past experiences bias their response.

Question 9 of 12: Ms. Langston receives a student’s text about homework but does not reply. The next day, the student questions her. What does her response indicate?

- She recognizes she should not communicate via unmonitored technology.

- She is trying to bait the student into revealing answers.

- Texting teachers is inappropriate under any circumstances.

Question 10 of 12: An educator’s use of electronic communication reveals a failure to separate personal and professional lives. Which example illustrates this?

- Sharing vacation photos via school email.

- Sending a virtual birthday greeting to a colleague via school email.

- Complaining about school policies through personal email.

Question 11 of 12: Ms. Battakuri texts Mika about a forgotten personal item after a principal’s reminder. Which excuse is least appropriate?

- Concern about Mika’s safety due to her history of forgetfulness.

- Not knowing that texting students directly is prohibited.

- Claiming it was the quickest way to get in touch.

Question 12 of 12: The principal proposes providing laptops to students with concerns about distractions. What is the best way to reassure parents?

- Cite studies showing minor distractions compared to benefits.

- Note most students already have internet access via smartphones.

- Promise that adjustments will be made if issues are identified.

Paper For Above instruction

The Professional Educator And Technology Assessm

The integration of technology in education raises numerous ethical considerations for educators, administrators, and policymakers. As educational environments become more digital and interconnected, it is essential for educators to navigate their professional responsibilities concerning student privacy, communication, and the responsible use of digital tools. This essay explores critical ethical issues related to technology in education, using specific scenarios and best practices to illustrate how educators can uphold ethical standards while leveraging technological advancements to enhance learning experiences.

Creating Responsible Policies for Student Data Privacy

Mr. Chiaro's observation of uninhibited email exchange of student information highlights the importance of establishing clear policies and procedures that protect student confidentiality. Many educational professionals inadvertently breach privacy standards due to a lack of formal guidelines; thus, proactive development of protocols aligned with legal frameworks such as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is crucial (Pardo & Tschmelak, 2018). Educators must advocate for comprehensive policies that define approved communication channels, data storage, and sharing protocols. Such policies should also entail regular training sessions to ensure staff members are aware of their responsibilities and the potential legal consequences of privacy violations (Hogan & Duke, 2020). Allowing informal emailing practices without oversight risks escalating privacy breaches and undermining students’ rights to confidentiality. Therefore, fostering a culture of responsible digital communication is integral to ethical educational practice.

Addressing the Risks of Public Display of Private Information

In the scenario involving Dr. Clayfin, her accidental display of email information serves as a reminder of the importance of privacy awareness and careful handling of digital content. The subsequent student contact underscores how easily informally shared information can be exploited or lead to unintended consequences (Bennett & Maton, 2018). Educators must recognize that even brief or seemingly innocuous disclosures can jeopardize third-party privacy rights and foster breaches of trust. Ethical principles, such as ensuring the rights of third parties are protected, guide educators to exercise caution when sharing digital content publicly (American Psychological Association, 2017). Educators should adopt best practices like blurring sensitive information on displays, using secure platforms for sharing confidential data, and fostering student awareness about privacy risks (Ribble, 2019). These steps help prevent violations and uphold the integrity of professional privacy standards.

Responding to Cyberbullying and Online Threats

Dr. Davis’s observations regarding Beth's interaction with an adult male via social media exemplify situations where educators must balance students' rights to online privacy with their safety. Respect for student privacy is a fundamental principle; however, when online activity presents clear risks of harm, educators have an ethical obligation to intervene (Kowalski et al., 2018). Monitoring and reporting cyberbullying or predatory online behavior is essential to protect minors and ensure a safe learning environment (Patchin & Hinduja, 2018). In the case of Beth, Dr. Davis should report the incident to appropriate authorities, such as school counselors or administrators, ensuring that the student is supported and that appropriate action is taken (Livingstone & Haddon, 2019). This proactive approach aligns with the educator’s duty to safeguard student well-being while respecting online privacy unless evidence of imminent harm exists.

Promoting Educational Technology Responsibly

Ms. Golff's initiative to involve students in creating lists of favorite educational games encourages engagement while supporting effective use of technology. Promoting educational applications that reinforce curriculum content can motivate students and foster independent learning (Wang & Sheikh-Khalil, 2018). Teachers should select high-quality, pedagogically grounded digital tools rather than merely joining in student entertainment. This practice ensures technology enhances teaching and learning, rather than serving as a distraction (Ertmer & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, 2019). Furthermore, involving students in curation not only fosters digital literacy but also builds ownership and responsible use habits. By guiding students toward educational resources and setting boundaries, educators uphold ethical standards of promoting learning while respecting technological integrity.

Addressing Inappropriate Content Sharing Among Students

When Mr. Clark learns about a student sharing explicit images, the priority is ensuring the safety of all students involved. Informing school administrators and following legal reporting protocols are crucial steps (Lumsden, 2017). Educators should also provide age-appropriate guidance about digital consent and the potential consequences of sharing explicit materials. Immediate parental involvement and counseling services are often necessary components to mitigate harm and prevent recurrence (O’Keeffe & Clarke-Pearson, 2011). Responding with disciplinary actions alone may be insufficient; integrating educational efforts around digital citizenship and responsible online behavior is key to fostering a respectful, safe digital environment (Kraft & Dougherty, 2019). These combined steps align with ethical commitments to student welfare and responsible digital conduct.

Monitoring Student Digital Behavior and Trends

Mr. Mathis’s careful observation of Aaron’s photo editing activities demonstrates vigilance in identifying inappropriate online behavior. Educators must stay abreast of digital trends to understand potential misconduct and provide appropriate guidance (Bali & Prihatini, 2020). Observing student interactions with digital tools allows teachers to identify signs of cyberbullying, harassment, or vandalism, facilitating timely intervention (Livingstone & Haddon, 2019). Promoting positive digital citizenship and embedding ethical considerations into the curriculum reinforces responsible technology use (Ribble, 2019). Teachers’ role as stewards of technology involves fostering an environment where students understand ethical boundaries and the importance of respectful online communication (Kowalski et al., 2018). Ethical vigilance supports both student safety and the integrity of the educational environment.

Handling Student Data Sharing and Confidentiality

Ms. Bilson’s request for student records highlights the importance of adhering to data-sharing protocols and legal regulations such as FERPA. Encouraging teachers to refer such requests to district administrators ensures compliance and protects student privacy (Pardo & Tschmelak, 2018). Educators should understand that sharing confidential information without proper consent can lead to legal consequences and breach students’ rights (Hogan & Duke, 2020). Building awareness about data privacy policies and working collaboratively with district officials are vital steps for ethical data management. Such practices promote transparency, accountability, and trustworthiness in handling sensitive student information.

Addressing Cyberbullying and School Responsibility

Ms. Kline’s responsibility to address cyberbullying extends beyond school hours and physical boundaries. Recognizing that social media activity impacts students’ safety at school obligates educators to act appropriately (Kowalski et al., 2018). While Sally’s claim that bullying did not occur on school grounds might seem dismissive, educators must understand their duty to monitor and address all bullying—online or offline—that affects students' well-being (Livingstone & Haddon, 2019). Implementing anti-bullying policies that encompass digital harassment and educating students about respectful online behavior promote a safe learning environment (Kraft & Dougherty, 2019). Such measures reflect an ethical commitment to supporting students’ mental health and fostering a culture of respect.

Maintaining Professional Boundaries in Digital Communication

Ms. Langston’s choice to ignore a student’s unsolicited message demonstrates awareness of boundary issues. Teachers must establish clear policies defining acceptable digital communication with students to prevent inappropriate interactions (Bali & Prihatini, 2020). Responses indicating that communication should be monitored and professional are essential to uphold ethical standards. Educators should avoid entering into personal dialogues that could compromise objectivity or privacy (Wang & Sheikh-Khalil, 2018). Consistent boundaries protect both students and educators, ensuring that digital tools are used solely for instructional and educational purposes, thus maintaining professionalism and trust.

Distinguishing Personal and Professional Digital Identities

The use of personal or social media for professional purposes requires careful consideration. Sharing personal images or opinions through school channels can blur boundaries and erode professionalism (Ribble, 2019). For example, sharing vacation photos via school email may inadvertently expose personal information to colleagues or students, risking privacy violations. Educators should maintain distinct personal and professional online identities, using separate accounts and being mindful of content shared (Kowalski et al., 2018). This separation preserves the integrity of teacher professionalism and minimizes distractions or ethical dilemmas associated with personal disclosures in official settings.

Legal and Ethical Use of Student Contact Information

Ms. Battakuri’s attempt to contact Mika via text underscores the need for adherence to legal and ethical guidelines regarding student communication. Using inappropriate channels, such as text messaging without prior consent, violates district policies and potentially legal standards (Hogan & Duke, 2020). Educators should rely on official communication methods approved by their institutions, such as school email or messaging platforms, and only with explicit parental or administrative consent when necessary (Pardo & Tschmelak, 2018). Excuses like “it was the quickest way” are insufficient, and educators must recognize the importance of maintaining professional boundaries and complying with legal standards to uphold ethical practice.

Addressing Parental Concerns about Technology Distractions

Concerns regarding student distractions from laptops can be addressed effectively by emphasizing evidence-based benefits of technology and future flexibility. Citing research that shows the positive impacts of laptops on engagement and learning, while acknowledging potential risks, demonstrates balanced and responsible leadership (Ertmer & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, 2019). Promising that the program can be adjusted in response to actual issues fosters trust and reflects a commitment to continuous improvement. Transparent communication with parents about the benefits and planned safeguards helps allay fears and supports successful implementation of technology initiatives in schools.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. APA.
• Bali, S. & Prihatini, S. (2020). Digital ethics in education: A review. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 213-228.
• Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2018). The role of privacy in educational technology. Computers & Education, 125, 165-174.
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2019). Teacher technology integration: A review. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(2), 147-161.
• Hogan, J., & Duke, R. (2020). Data privacy policies in schools: An ethical overview. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(4), 401-415.
• Kraft, M., & Dougherty, M. (2019). Promoting digital citizenship in schools. Educational Leadership, 77(3), 22-27.
• Kowalski, R., Giumetti, G. W., & Witte, T. (2018). Cyberbullying and the school environment. Journal of School Violence, 17(1), 3-15.
• Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2019). Children, digital media and mental health. Cambridge University Press.
• Lumsden, R. (2017). Cyberbullying laws and school policies. Journal of School Law, 48(4), 383-404.
• O’Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children’s health. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800-804.
• Pardo, L. S., & Tschmelak, L. (2018). Privacy and ethics in educational technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(1), 122-142.
• Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2018). Cyberbullying prevention and response. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(4), 245-250.
• Ribble, M. (2019). Digital citizenship in schools: Nine elements all students should know. ISTE.
• Wang, A. I., & Sheikh-Khalil, S. (2018). Integrating technology in education: A review. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 45-60.