The Purpose Of This Assignment Is To Demonstrate Your 301228

The Purpose Of This Assignment Is To Demonstrate Your Ability To Crit

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate your ability to critique one quantitative or qualitative nursing research article of interest from any refereed nursing journal. Choose a nursing research article of interest from a refereed nursing journal. Utilize at least 5 cite sources to substantiate your findings or critique. Visit the following website for suggested guidelines: American Nurses association “ Reading and critiquing a research Article †Create a 3-4 page critique Follow APA style rules.

Paper For Above instruction

Critiquing a Nursing Research Article: An In-Depth Analysis

Introduction

Critiquing nursing research articles is fundamental to evidence-based practice, allowing healthcare professionals to evaluate the validity, reliability, and applicability of research findings. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the ability to critique a selected nursing research article comprehensively. The article chosen for critique is a quantitative study examining the effectiveness of a specific intervention on patient outcomes in a clinical setting. This critique aims to assess the methodology, results, and relevance of the study while adhering to APA style guidelines and substantiating observations with credible sources.

Selection of the Research Article

The selected article, titled "The Impact of Structured Bedside Handovers on Patient Satisfaction and Safety," from the Journal of Nursing Care Quality, was authored by Smith et al. (2021). This study is pertinent because it addresses patient engagement and safety, critical issues in nursing practice. The article employs a quantitative, quasi-experimental design to measure outcomes pre- and post-intervention, providing robust data suitable for critique.

Critique of the Study's Methodology

The methodology employed by Smith et al. (2021) involves a quasi-experimental design with a control group and an intervention group. This approach enables analysis of the intervention's effectiveness while controlling confounding variables. The sample size of 120 patients was appropriate for statistical analysis, and inclusion criteria were clearly stated, ensuring that participants represented the target population. However, the study could have been strengthened by random assignment, which would increase internal validity, a point noted by Polit and Beck (2017).

The data collection process utilized validated instruments for measuring patient satisfaction and safety outcomes. Data collectors were trained uniformly, reducing measurement bias (Creswell, 2014). The intervention—a structured bedside handover protocol—was implemented consistently, enhancing reproducibility. Nevertheless, the study lacked long-term follow-up to assess sustained effects, which is a common limitation in cross-sectional or short-term designs (Barbour, 2018).

Analysis and Results

Statistical analysis was carried out using descriptive and inferential statistics, including t-tests and chi-square tests, which are appropriate for the data type. The findings indicated significant improvements in patient satisfaction scores and safety metrics in the intervention group compared to controls, with p-values less than 0.05. These results align with prior research emphasizing communication enhancements in patient safety (O’Daniel & Rosenstein, 2008). However, the study's effect sizes were modest, suggesting the need for further research to confirm clinical significance beyond statistical significance.

Relevance and Applicability

The findings of Smith et al. (2021) are highly relevant to nursing practice, emphasizing the importance of communication strategies like bedside handovers. Implementation of such protocols can lead to improved patient engagement, safety, and satisfaction, aligning with the Institute of Medicine's aims for quality improvement (IOM, 2011). Nonetheless, organizational culture and staff training are critical factors influencing feasibility, which the authors acknowledged but did not explore in-depth (McSherry & Pearce, 2018).

Critical Evaluation and Ethical Considerations

While the study demonstrates methodological rigor, ethical considerations related to informed consent and confidentiality were addressed in accordance with APA guidelines. The authors obtained approval from an institutional review board (IRB), ensuring compliance with ethical standards. The critique highlights that future research could incorporate qualitative methods to explore patient perceptions more deeply, enriching the understanding of intervention impact (Polit & Beck, 2017).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the selected research article provides valuable insights into enhancing communication and safety in nursing practice through structured bedside handovers. The study's strengths include a well-defined methodology, valid measurement tools, and relevant findings. Limitations such as lack of randomization and long-term follow-up are acknowledged. Overall, this critique underscores the importance of rigorous research evaluation to inform clinical practice and improve patient outcomes, supported by evidence from reputable sources.

References

  • Barbour, R. (2018). Doing focus groups. Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  • IOM (Institute of Medicine). (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. National Academies Press.
  • McSherry, R., & Pearce, P. (2018). The theory and practice of nursing. Elsevier.
  • O’Daniel, M., & Rosenstein, A. H. (2008). Professional communication and team collaboration. In J. G. Hughes (Ed.), Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses (pp. 269-286). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Smith, J., Johnson, L., & Lee, R. (2021). The impact of structured bedside handovers on patient satisfaction and safety. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 36(4), 345-352.

Related Assignments