The Research Project Presentation For This Class Is Divided
The Research Projectpresentation For This Class Is Divided Into Three
The Research Project/Presentation for this class is divided into three major assignments: 1) annotated bibliography, 2) outline, and 3) final presentation. The first part is the annotated bibliography, which involves summarizing and evaluating selected sources that will be used for the presentation. For this assignment, you need to include three sources, each with a complete citation in APA format, a summary of the source's main points, and an evaluation of its credibility and relevance. The purpose of creating an annotated bibliography is to assess the credibility of sources, understand their relevance to your topic, and prepare for the final presentation. It also helps in identifying credible sources, particularly when using information from various websites, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the research.
To prepare, review the sample annotated bibliography provided, and carefully read the grading criteria as these will guide your performance. The sources you select should be thoroughly evaluated to determine their credibility, reliability, and relevance. In the summary section, explain what the source is about, its main points, and which topics it covers, typically in 4-6 sentences. In the evaluation, describe the source’s format (e.g., peer-reviewed journal, website, book), its credibility considering the publisher or sponsoring organization, and the reliability of the author(s), also in 4-6 sentences. This process will help you develop a strong foundation for your final presentation by ensuring your sources are credible and pertinent.
Paper For Above instruction
The research project for this course emphasizes a systematic approach through three distinct assignments: the annotated bibliography, outline, and final presentation. The initial phase involves crafting an annotated bibliography, a critical step that entails summarizing and evaluating potential sources. The purpose of this exercise is multifaceted: it ensures the selection of credible sources, enhances understanding of the topic, and lays the groundwork for a compelling final presentation.
In constructing your annotated bibliography, you are required to analyze three sources meticulously. Each source must be presented with a complete citation formatted in APA style, a concise summary, and an evaluation of its credibility and relevance. The citation provides bibliographic information crucial for referencing and verification. The summary should encapsulate the main purpose of the source—whether it is an original research article, review, or another type—and highlight the key topics covered. Typically, this section should encompass 4-6 sentences that distill the essence of the material, allowing you to grasp the core ideas and relevance of each source.
The evaluation component is equally critical, requiring a thorough assessment of the source's credibility and reliability. This involves describing the format—such as whether it is a peer-reviewed journal article, a website, or a book—and commenting on the authority of the publisher or sponsoring organization. Further, it entails scrutinizing the credibility of the author(s), considering their expertise, affiliations, and the quality of the publication. This evaluation should also address how reliable the information presented is and its suitability for your research topic, generally in 4-6 sentences. Through this process, you determine the usefulness and trustworthiness of each source, ensuring your research is built upon solid foundations.
The ultimate goal of the annotated bibliography is to refine your source selection for the final presentation, fostering critical thinking and research skills. Such deliberate evaluation enhances the quality of your work and prepares you to deliver an informed and credible presentation. Remember, while only three sources are required at this stage, your final presentation should include at least five sources, demonstrating comprehensive research and evaluation.
References
- Author, A. A. (Year). Title of the article or book. Title of the Journal or Publisher. URL or DOI
- Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of the research paper. Peer-reviewed Journal Name, volume(issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
- Sponsoring Organization. (Year). Title of the webpage or report. Website Name. URL
- Author, D. D. (Year). Title of the book. Publisher.
- Author, E. E. (Year). An evaluation of credibility in online sources. Journal of Information Science, 45(3), 123-135. https://doi.org/xxxxx