The Term Paper For This Class Is Worth 200 Points ✓ Solved
Computer The term paper for this class is worth 200 points
The term paper for this class is worth 200 points, and it requires you to do a research and write a word paper describing RIPv2 Protocol. The paper will include the following: The paper must have a distinct and well written Introduction, Supporting Body and Conclusion. In the body include the following: The history of the protocol chosen; The programmable parameters of the protocol and how they affect traffic flow; The major differences between the routing protocol chosen and the others that were not chosen; How the chosen protocol can be used in a modern day routed network environment. Site at least two advantages and two disadvantages of your chosen routing protocol subject. Site at least two of the most common programmable parameters of the protocol, and how they affect traffic flow; Discuss the major differences between the routing protocol chosen and all others that were not chosen. In the Conclusion of your Paper: Discuss how your chosen protocol can be used in a modern day routed network environment. (seen in Conclusion) Paper Sections: Description: Your Paper MUST contain the following sections. Title Page - Title of Paper - Author - Class - Professor Introduction Body - Support Introduction - Elements (see above) - History - Advantages/Dis-advantages - Two Programmable Parameters - How do they effect traffic flow - Compared your chosen Protocol to all Routing Protocols we have studied Conclusion - Your Opinion of selected Routing Protocol - A Summary - Modern Day Usage
Sample Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
Routing protocols are essential components of modern computer networks, facilitating the transfer of data across diverse network segments. Among the numerous routing protocols available, Routing Information Protocol version 2 (RIPv2) stands out due to its simplicity and widespread use in small to medium-sized networks. This paper explores the intricacies of RIPv2, including its history, programmable parameters, advantages, disadvantages, and its application in contemporary network environments.
History of RIPv2
Developed as an enhancement of the original Routing Information Protocol (RIP), RIPv2 was introduced in the early 1990s to address the limitations of its predecessor. While RIP was limited to classful routing and lacked support for modern network features, RIPv2 introduced classless routing capabilities, authentication, and support for variable-length subnet masking (VLSM). Its backward compatibility with RIP ensured a smooth transition for network administrators adopting the newer protocol.
Programmable Parameters and Their Effects
RIPv2 includes several programmable parameters that influence its operation. Two notable parameters are the split horizon with poison reverse and the update timer. The split horizon with poison reverse helps prevent routing loops by not advertising routes back to the interface from which they originated, or by marking routes as unreachable. This parameter can reduce network instability and improve convergence times. The update timer, which typically defaults to 30 seconds, determines how frequently the router broadcasts its routing table. Adjusting this timer affects traffic flow; shorter timers increase update frequency, enhancing real-time accuracy but also increasing network overhead, while longer timers reduce overhead but may delay network convergence.
Major Differences Between RIPv2 and Other Routing Protocols
Compared to protocols like OSPF and BGP, RIPv2 is a distance-vector protocol with a maximum hop count of 15, limiting its scalability. OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) is a link-state protocol that supports hierarchical network design and converges faster, making it suitable for larger networks. BGP (Border Gateway Protocol), used primarily for inter-AS routing, manages routing between different autonomous systems with complex policies. RIPv2's simplicity makes it ideal for small networks but less applicable to large, complex environments where advanced features are required.
Application in Modern Network Environments
Despite its limitations, RIPv2 remains relevant in certain scenarios. In small office or home networks, it offers ease of configuration and adequate performance. Its simplicity allows for quick deployment and minimal overhead. However, in large enterprise networks, protocols like OSPF or EIGRP are preferred due to their scalability. RIPv2 can also serve as a backup routing protocol or in environments where straightforward routing is sufficient.
Advantages and Disadvantages
Two advantages of RIPv2 include its simplicity and ease of configuration, making it accessible for beginners and small networks. Additionally, its support for VLSM allows for more efficient IP address utilization. Disadvantages include its limited scalability, with a maximum hop count of 15, and slow convergence times compared to link-state protocols. Furthermore, it is vulnerable to routing loops if not configured properly.
Key Programmable Parameters and Their Impact
The two critical programmable parameters are the update timer and the route invalid timer. The update timer controls how frequently routing updates are sent, influencing network traffic and responsiveness. The route invalid timer determines how long a route remains valid without updates; shorter timers lead to quicker route invalidation, promoting faster convergence, but may cause instability if not managed properly.
Comparison with Other Routing Protocols
Compared to link-state protocols such as OSPF, RIPv2's operation is more straightforward, relying on periodic updates rather than topology databases. While OSPF offers faster convergence and scalability, RIPv2's simplicity reduces complexity and resource consumption. Unlike BGP, which supports policy-based routing for internet backbone connectivity, RIPv2 is more limited but easier to implement in small networks.
Conclusion
In conclusion, RIPv2 remains a viable routing protocol for small networks due to its simplicity and ease of use. While it lacks the scalability and advanced features of protocols like OSPF and BGP, its straightforward configuration makes it suitable for basic network environments. Modern networks can leverage RIPv2 as a backup or transitional protocol, especially where advanced routing isn't necessary. Overall, understanding RIPv2 provides valuable insights into fundamental routing principles that underpin more complex protocols.
References
- Lammle, T. (2016). Cisco CCNA Routing and Switching 200-125. Cisco Press.
- Stallings, W. (2013). Data and Computer Communications. Pearson.
- Forouzan, B. (2017). Data Communications and Networking. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Hu, R., & Chang, S. (2019). Routing Protocols and Network Design. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.
- Huc, M. (2020). Essentials of Routing Protocols. Networking Journal.
- Kurose, J. F., & Ross, K. W. (2017). Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach. Pearson.
- Nadeem, J., et al. (2021). Evaluation of Routing Protocols in Small Network Environments. Journal of Network and Computer Applications.
- Yasemin, H. (2018). Comparative Analysis of Routing Protocols. International Journal of Communications.
- Cisco Systems. (2022). RIPv2 Configuration Guide. Cisco Documentation.
- Schneider, S. (2015). Network Protocols and Architectures. Wiley.