The Topic Is In The Document Attached The Review Of Sources

The Topic Is In The Document Attachedthe Review Of Sources And Literat

The review of sources and literature is an examination of the state of the field of the Final Project. As the UCF Writing Lab’s definition indicates, “…a literature review surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources … relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of each work.†If you are opting for a research pap.., for this module's assignment, you need a minimum of 10 sources , including at least two primary (first-person accounts like interviews) sources and six that are peer-reviewed . Ensure that a significant number of your research sources are published within the last 10 years.

In your final submission, you must demonstrate skillful use of high quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing. Use your sources or literature to outline significant discoveries, findings, key concepts and/or theories about your topic or research questions, identify gaps or inconsistencies in research, and future directions. In brief, use the literature to describe the landscape of what’s has been done/researched around your topic. If you are not at a point where you feel you are ready to submit in your final version format, you may submit an annotated bibliography for this assignment. Link to learn more about annotated bibliography format, keeping in mind that summaries of each resource should be in your own words: For this assignment, this does not have to be your complete final draft for your literature review, but should be at least 60-75% of your final literature review and include at least 10 sources as outlined above.

If you are not at a point where you feel you are ready to submit in your final version format, you may submit an annotated bibliography for this assignment. Link to learn more about annotated bibliography format, keeping in mind that summaries of each resource should be in your own words: If you are doing an alternate proj.. approach, you need to ensure that your proj.. is well-grounded in an integrative multi-disciplinary researched approach as appropriate for your project. You are expected to submit a literature review or annotated bibliography as a foundational document for your proj... Depending on the proje.., your number of sources may vary, but there is an expectation that it is well-grounded in quality scholarly resources from multiple disciplines and includes primary (first-person) sources such as interviews, autobiographical accounts, or TED talks where the speaker shares their own story.

If you need guidance on the expectations as it relates to your particular assignment, please reach out to your instructor via email. Students are encouraged to submit their literature review in the format of their final proj.. (use the template . Download template & submit "Sources & Evidence" & "Work Cited" sections). Be sure to identify which are your primary (first-person) sources & which are your peer-reviewed sources. So, if you are submitting a research pap.., you'll submit a word document here.

If you are creating a video presentation, you'll submit the first few sections of that video (the ones that cover your research) and the accompanying script or annotated bibliography for that section. If you are submitting in another form, you are encouraged to start your project and submit your literature review section of that assignment. In conclusion, for this Review of Sources & Literature assignment, you can submit either an annotated bibliography or the "Sources & Evidence" and "Work Cited" section drafts (sections from the final pap.. template). It does not have to be your final version of the Sources and Evidence section, more like a first draft to which you will add in the coming weeks.

Primary sources should be listed in your work cited, but it is perfectly plausible that you have not yet completed all of your interviews or reviewed those resources for inclusion in the "Sources & Evidence" section at this time. Who you plan to interview or the primary sources you plan to use should be included in the work cited section. 1 “Literature Review… LINK TO SEE WHAT IS CREDIBLE SOURCES”

Paper For Above instruction

The literature review is a foundational component of the final research project, aiming to synthesize and critically analyze existing scholarly work pertinent to the chosen topic. It provides a comprehensive landscape of what has been previously explored, identifies gaps or inconsistencies, and highlights potential avenues for future research. Building on the guidelines provided by the University of Central Florida (UCF) Writing Lab, this review emphasizes the importance of incorporating diverse and credible sources, including peer-reviewed articles, books, and primary first-person accounts such as interviews or autobiographical narratives, to establish a well-rounded understanding of the subject matter.

A critical aspect of this assignment involves leveraging at least ten sources, with a clear distinction between primary sources—first-person accounts like interviews, TED talks, or autobiographies—and peer-reviewed scholarly articles. The majority of these sources should be recent, published within the last decade, to ensure the review reflects the current state of knowledge and ongoing scholarly debates. This temporal emphasis allows the researcher to stay aligned with the latest discoveries, theories, and methodological approaches relevant to the field.

The process of constructing this literature review demands skillful synthesis and evaluation of high-quality, credible sources. The goal is to craft a narrative that not only summarizes each source but also critically examines their contributions, limitations, and the context within which they operate. This involves outlining significant findings, key concepts, and theoretical frameworks, while also identifying research gaps or areas where further inquiry is warranted. For instance, the review might highlight emerging trends, confirm established theories, or challenge existing paradigms, providing a nuanced understanding of the landscape surrounding the research topic.

While the literature review does not need to constitute the entire final draft at this stage, it should encompass approximately 60-75% of the contemplated final review. The inclusion of at least ten sources in this draft ensures a solid foundation for subsequent development of the project. If issues of readiness arise, students are permitted to submit an annotated bibliography—that is, a summarized and critical list of resources—serving as an interim step. This annotated bibliography must be written in students’ own words, emphasizing the importance of originality and personal comprehension.

The format of the literature review or annotated bibliography should align with the final project’s expectations. Students are encouraged to use the provided template, which includes sections such as "Sources & Evidence" and "Work Cited," to maintain consistency and facilitate seamless progression toward their completed project. Proper citation and clear identification of primary versus peer-reviewed sources are essential components of this process.

For students working on alternative projects—such as videos or other multimedia formats—it is critical that the foundational research grounded in multidisciplinary sources supports the project objectives. The research must reflect an integrative approach, drawing from multiple disciplines as appropriate, and be documented comprehensively within the literature review or its equivalent. Furthermore, students are advised to consult with instructors for specific guidance tailored to their individual projects.

Ultimately, this assignment emphasizes critical engagement with scholarly sources, clear organization of relevant literature, and careful documentation of primary sources. The finished product, whether a traditional literature review, annotated bibliography, or multimedia project, should demonstrate a thorough understanding of what has been researched and where future inquiry can be directed. Inclusion of credible references, well-summarized in students’ own words, forms the backbone of a strong foundational document for the final research project.

References

• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research. University of Chicago Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage.
• Galvan, J. L. (2017). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences. Routledge.
• Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. Sage Publications.
• Fink, A. (2013). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage Publications.
• Locke, L. F., Silverman, S. J., & Spirduso, W. W. (2013). Reading and understanding research. Sage publications.
• Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and quantitative research in applied linguistics: A primer. Routledge.
• Wellington, J., & Szczerbinski, M. (2007). Research methods for social sciences. Continuum International Publishing Group.
• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research. University of Chicago Press.