The Training Program Fabrics Inc Presented At The End Of Cha

The Training Program Fabrics Incpresented At The End Of Chapters 4

The Training Program (Fabrics, Inc.) presented at the end of chapters 4, 5, 8, and 9 of the Blanchard and Thacker (2013) text illustrates the application of the training process model in a real-world small business context. This paper critically examines the various phases involved in designing and implementing a training program for Fabrics, Inc., including needs analysis, training design, development and implementation, and evaluation. Each section will evaluate the processes used, suggest improvements, and provide insights based on scholarly sources.

Abstract

This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the training program developed for Fabrics, Inc., a small fabrications company, as depicted in the Blanchard and Thacker (2013) case study. It offers a critique of the needs analysis, discusses the development of training objectives, explores potential training modules, and evaluates the assessment tools utilized. The review emphasizes the importance of comprehensive organizational and operational analyses, detailed instructional design, and effective evaluation strategies for successful training initiatives. Through scholarly perspectives, the paper recommends best practices for enhancing training effectiveness and ensuring alignment with organizational goals.

Background of Fabrics, Inc.

Fabrics, Inc. is a small manufacturing company specializing in textile production and fabric weaving. The company has experienced growth but faces challenges related to employee skill levels, production efficiency, and conflict resolution within teams. Recognizing the need for targeted training, Fabrics, Inc. engaged in a structured process to develop a comprehensive training program aimed at improving operational standards, fostering teamwork, and reducing workplace conflicts. The initiative was guided by the Training Process Model, which underscores a systematic approach from needs assessment through to evaluation.

Needs Analysis

The needs analysis phase conducted for Fabrics, Inc. involved analyzing organizational and operational factors to identify training gaps. The organizational analysis targeted company goals, management support, and resource availability. Operational analysis was intended to evaluate worker performance and workflow efficiency; however, it was not completed due to limited data collection and incomplete interviews.

Critique of the organizational analysis reveals that while high-level goals and resource constraints were considered, the analysis lacked depth in assessing employee skill levels and specific performance deficiencies. It could have included questions about employees’ perceptions of their skills, barriers to productivity, and potential areas for development. Additionally, questions regarding the company's readiness for change and management’s commitment to training outcomes were underexplored.

The operational analysis was notably incomplete. Critical questions such as “What are the specific tasks employees struggle with?” or “Which processes are bottlenecked?” were missing. Future analyses should incorporate detailed interviews and observations, asking questions such as: “What are the most frequent errors during production?” “How do employees perceive current training effectiveness?” and “What specific skills need enhancement to meet production targets?”

Training Design

In the design phase, Blanchard and Thacker (2013) developed objectives exclusively for conflict resolution; for this section, I will develop objectives for a different training requirement: quality control in fabric production. The training objectives are as follows:

• Participants will accurately identify common fabric defects and their causes.
• Participants will apply appropriate inspection techniques to identify fabric imperfections.
• Participants will implement corrective measures to minimize fabric defects.
• Participants will document and report quality issues following company protocols.

Critiquing the design component, it is evident that the objectives are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). However, the design lacked emphasis on interactive learning strategies such as hands-on inspection exercises, case studies, or role-playing, which could improve skill retention. It also did not detail the alignment of objectives with organizational standards or the integration with existing processes. Addressing these gaps could enhance the relevance and effectiveness of the training.

Development and Implementation

The original case from Blanchard and Thacker (2013) noted the absence of discussion regarding the development and implementation phases for Fabrics, Inc. To bridge this gap, additional modules could include:

• Quality Inspection Procedures: Hands-on training on fabric defect identification, inspection tools, and documentation.
• Team Communication Skills: Workshops aimed at improving intra-team communication to reduce misunderstandings and conflicts.
• Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Adherence: Training on company procedures for fabric production and quality assurance.
• Equipment Handling and Maintenance: Modules focusing on proper use and maintenance of weaving machinery to prevent defects.

Implementation strategies should involve a blend of classroom instruction, on-the-job training, and peer coaching. For example, simulations and real-time inspections could reinforce learning, with supervisors providing feedback. Ensuring site-specific customization and addressing scheduling challenges are vital to maximize participation and impact.

Evaluation of Training

The case study employed two evaluation instruments: participant feedback forms and pre/post skill assessments. While these tools provided initial insights, their validity and comprehensiveness can be improved. The evaluation results should inform ongoing training refinement, individual performance support, and broader organizational change initiatives.

Internal validity of the assessments included observing changes in individual performance metrics and skills acquisition immediately post-training. External validity factors involve whether improvements are sustainable over time and translate into organizational benefits, such as increased production quality or reduced defects.

To enhance evaluation, it is recommended that Fabrics, Inc. implement longitudinal assessments, gather supervisor feedback, and track defect rates over time. Additionally, applying Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Training Evaluation Model—reaction, learning, behavior, and results—would provide a comprehensive view of training effectiveness (Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2006).

Conclusion

The systematic development of Fabrics, Inc.'s training program adheres to the phases outlined in the Training Process Model, yet opportunities for enhancement exist. A more thorough needs analysis, including operational insights, would allow for precisely targeted training interventions. Developing clear, relevant learning objectives and designing interactive, practice-oriented modules can increase engagement and retention. Effective development and implementation require detailed planning, resource allocation, and customization. Robust evaluation strategies, including multiple measures over time, ensure ongoing improvement and alignment with business objectives. Overall, a strategic, data-driven approach to training enhances organizational performance and employee development within small manufacturing businesses like Fabrics, Inc.

References

• Blanchard, P. N., & Thacker, J. W. (2013). Effective training: Systems, strategies, and practices (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Noe, R. A. (2017). Employee training and development (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Training in organizations (4th ed.). Wadsworth.
• Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101.
• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
• Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105.
• Ottawa, C., & Cox, R. (2014). The role of assessment in training effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Training, 22(3), 45–58.
• Yelon, S. (2004). Linking training to business performance. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36(4), 150–153.
• Brinkerhoff, R. O. (2003). The success case method: Find out quickly what's working and what's not. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.