The Utilitarian Ethic Developed By Jeremy Bentham And John S

The Utilitarian Ethic Developed By Jeremy Bentham And John Stuart Mill

The utilitarian ethic developed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill has been one of the most influential approaches to ethics ever devised. In this discussion, we consider how this ethic prescribes individual conduct and social policies. For example, should I keep my promise to help my friend study for his exam this weekend or skip out and spend time at the beach? Likewise, should society practice capital punishment? How does a utilitarian decide such issues, and what assumptions does this ethic make about human motivation and goals? Is pleasure the most important goal for humans? Additionally, what role do the quality and quantity of pleasures play—are some pleasures inherently more valuable than others?

Paper For Above instruction

Utilitarianism, as developed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, is a consequentialist ethical theory that evaluates actions based on their outcomes, primarily the promotion of happiness and the reduction of suffering. Both philosophers sought to establish a moral framework that maximizes overall well-being, but their nuanced perspectives on pleasure and human motivation distinguish their versions of utilitarianism. This paper explores how naive and refined utilitarianism approach individual decisions and social policies, examines the assumptions about human nature underlying the ethic, and considers the significance of pleasure's quality versus quantity.

At its core, utilitarianism prescribes that individuals should act in ways that maximize happiness and minimize pain for the greatest number. Jeremy Bentham, the founder of classical utilitarianism, proposed a quantitative approach where the moral worth of an action is determined by its net amount of pleasure produced. Bentham believed that pleasures could be measured objectively through the “felicific calculus,” which considers factors such as intensity, duration, certainty, proximity, and extent. His emphasis on the quantification of pleasure implies that all pleasures are interchangeable in their capacity to produce happiness, regardless of their nature.

John Stuart Mill refined utilitarianism by emphasizing the qualitative aspects of pleasures. He argued that some pleasures are inherently superior to others due to their higher intellectual, moral, or aesthetic qualities. Mill distinguished between "higher" pleasures—such as intellectual pursuits, artistic appreciation, and moral development—and "lower" pleasures related to physical sensation and immediate gratification. According to Mill, these qualitative differences are crucial because they reflect the true value of pleasures and suggest that a well-rounded, morally cultivated life is more desirable than a life solely dedicated to base pleasures. This differentiation underscores that utilitarian virtue involves not just maximizing pleasure but also valuing the richness and depth of pleasurable experiences.

In decision-making, utilitarians employ a rational calculus to evaluate potential actions based on their anticipated outcomes. When contemplating personal actions like helping a friend versus spending leisure time at the beach, a utilitarian considers which choice will generate the most happiness overall. Similarly, social policies such as capital punishment are assessed by analyzing their social consequences. Bentham argued that if capital punishment deters crime, leading to a greater net increase in societal happiness instead of suffering, then it is justified. Mill, on the other hand, would examine the moral quality and long-term effects of such policies, weighing their impact on individual rights and societal progress.

This utilitarian framework presupposes certain aspects of human motivation and goal-setting. Both Bentham and Mill assumed that humans are primarily motivated by the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain—that these are innate, fundamental drives. Accordingly, moral actions are those that promote individual and collective happiness, which aligns with hedonistic principles. However, Mill’s emphasis on higher pleasures implies that humans are capable of pursuing more sophisticated and morally significant goals—such as intellectual growth, moral virtue, and social harmony—that surpass simple physical sensations. These higher pursuits, in Mill’s view, are more enduring and fulfilling, suggesting that the utilitarian goal is not merely physical pleasure but the cultivation of a meaningful, flourishing life.

One key debate in utilitarianism concerns whether pleasure should be evaluated solely based on quantity or whether quality plays an essential role. Bentham’s approach was predominantly quantitative—counting pleasures regardless of their nature—assuming that all pleasures contribute equally to happiness. Mill challenged this view by introducing a qualitative assessment, arguing that some pleasures are qualitatively superior because they engage higher faculties of the mind and soul. For instance, the pleasure derived from intellectual endeavors or moral virtue is considered more valuable than mere physical gratification. This emphasis on quality seeks to refine utilitarianism into a more nuanced and human-centered ethic that respects the dignity and complexity of human experience.

Critics of utilitarianism raise several objections, such as the difficulty of accurately measuring and comparing pleasures, the potential violation of individual rights in pursuit of the greater good, and the risk of justifying immoral acts if they produce overall happiness. Despite these critiques, utilitarianism remains influential for its straightforward calculation of moral value and its focus on outcomes rather than intentions or intrinsic moral duties. Its adaptability to social policy—such as the debate over capital punishment—demonstrates its commitment to pragmatic, consequence-based evaluations.

In conclusion, utilitarianism developed by Bentham and Mill provides a consequentialist ethic grounded in the maximization of happiness. While Bentham’s quantitative calculus emphasizes the measurable aspects of pleasure, Mill’s qualitative distinctions highlight the importance of higher pursuits. Both perspectives presuppose that human motivation is centered on pleasure and pain, though Mill’s focus on higher pleasures suggests a more complex view of human goals. This ethic continues to influence contemporary debates on personal conduct and social policy, emphasizing the importance of considering outcomes and the nuanced value of pleasures in moral reasoning.

References

• Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Clarendon Press.
• Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
• Hare, R. M. (2007). Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford University Press.
• Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2019). Moral Philosophy. Routledge.
• Cohen, G. A. (2000). Facts and Values. Oxford University Press.
• Freeman, M. (2007). The Moral Status of Animals. Oxford University Press.
• Railton, P. (1984). Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality. Philosophical Review, 93(2), 221-259.
• Parfit, D. (2011). On What Matters. Oxford University Press.
• Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
• Schneider, C. (2010). The Modern Moral Philosophy. Routledge.