The Wedding Fight Background Kyle And Kelly Have Been Dating ✓ Solved

The Wedding Fight Background Kyle And Kelly Have Been Dati

After reading the chapter(s), analyze the sample dialogue. In your analysis, you must incorporate ideas, concepts, and theory from the chapter(s) to support your thoughts, answers, and/or rationales. This way, you can demonstrate your understanding of the readings and key concepts.

1. Diagram the conflict triangle for this conflict. a. Be sure to use the appropriate symbols to represent conflict dyads, high/low power, ally, and/or isolate, etc. b. Below the diagram, write a brief justification, explanation or rationale for your diagram(s)/symbols.

2. Diagram the coalitions for this case. a. Below the diagram, write a brief justification, explanation or rationale for your diagram(s).

3. Read Interaction Rules (p.238) and identify the “rules” in this conversation/relationship. According to Shimanoff’s (p.238) format, write at least five rules you think Kyle and Kelly should formulate for future conflicts.

Paper For Above Instructions

The dialogue between Kyle and Kelly reflects underlying tensions that can be analyzed through conflict theory and communication dynamics. In this analysis, we will explore the conflict triangle, the coalitions formed, and the interaction rules that could be established to enhance communication between the couple.

Conflict Triangle Analysis

The conflict triangle is a model used to illustrate the dynamics of conflict, showing the relationship between interests, positions, and needs of the individuals involved. In the dialogue, Kyle and Kelly demonstrate a clear conflict over the wedding planning process, which acts as the source of tension.

In this scenario, Kyle represents a low power position when it comes to wedding planning, as he appears disengaged and overwhelmed by other commitments, particularly his studies. In contrast, Kelly exhibits high power in context, demonstrating strong emotions and a clear interest in the wedding details. This power dynamic creates a dyad characterized by miscommunication and frustration.

The use of symbols to represent these dynamics could be illustrated as follows:

• Kyle: (Low Power) represented by a small circle.
• Kelly: (High Power) represented by a large circle.
• Conflict Dyad: A line connecting both circles indicating their interpersonal conflict.

Justification for this diagram includes the observation that Kyle's focus on studying leads him to neglect the relational responsibilities associated with wedding planning. Kelly's perception of Kyle’s lack of involvement exacerbates her feelings of frustration and isolation in the relationship. Hence, the imbalance of power in their communication exacerbates the conflict.

Coalition Diagram Analysis

In this scenario, the coalitions can be identified as the internal alignments that either support or contradict the central conflict. While Kyle and Kelly engage in an argument predominantly centered on wedding planning, the discussion also reveals other influencing factors such as Kyle's commitment to his studies and Kelly's emotional investment in the wedding.

The coalition can be illustrated as:

• Coalition 1: Kelly + wedding planning interests.
• Coalition 2: Kyle + academic responsibilities.

This indicates that both parties are forming allegiance towards their separate priorities, with little emphasis on collaborative planning or mutual support.

Justification for this coalition representation is evident in the dialogue as it showcases how both individuals simultaneously champion their own causes. Kelly is preoccupied with feeling validated about the wedding details, whereas Kyle feels justified in prioritizing his academic workload over social engagements.

Interaction Rules Identification

According to Shimanoff’s guidelines on interaction rules, the conversation reflects several implicit rules that govern Kyle and Kelly’s communication regarding conflict:

• Rule 1: Open Communication - Both parties should express their feelings openly without resorting to sarcasm or criticism.
• Rule 2: Prioritize the Relationship - Each should acknowledge the importance of the wedding and their partnership rather than focusing solely on individual needs.
• Rule 3: Respect Each Other's Contributions - Encouraging acknowledgment of each person's efforts and responsibilities in wedding planning.
• Rule 4: Constructive Feedback - Provide feedback to one another regarding preferences and disagreements in a manner that is constructive.
• Rule 5: Collaborative Problem Solving - Engage in joint problem-solving to address areas of discontent openly rather than in a combative manner.

By formalizing these interaction rules, Kyle and Kelly can potentially mitigate future conflicts by fostering an environment of mutual respect and understanding.

Conclusion

In analyzing the dialogue between Kyle and Kelly, it is clear that communication styles and power dynamics are significant contributors to the conflict surrounding their wedding planning. Utilizing conflict theory and communication rules, both parties can work towards a more collaborative approach that respects their individual needs while addressing the joint responsibility of their upcoming wedding.

References

• Adler, R. B., & Rodman, G. (2016). Understanding Human Communication. Oxford University Press.
• Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict. Yale University Press.
• Fisher, R., Ury, W. L., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.
• Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books.
• Holmes, J. (2008). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Routledge.
• Kahn, R. L. & Byosiere, P. (1992). Stress in Organizations. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 3). Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Miller, D. (2011). Communication and Conflict Resolution. Communication Research Trends.
• Schmidt, W. H. (2007). The Importance of Communication in Conflict Resolution. Conflict Resolution Quarterly.
• Shimanoff, S. B. (1985). Interaction Rules as a Tool for Understanding Communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.
• Wilmot, W. W., & Hocker, J. L. (2011). Interpersonal Conflict. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.