Then For The Article You Choose To Write On You Will Type A

Then Forthe Article You Choose To Write On You Will Type A 1000 150

Then, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a word response in which you address EACH of the following points IN YOUR OWN WORDS : 1) What is the author's main argument? 2) How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)? 3) Do you agree or disagree with him? 4) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of at least two of the readings we have studied in this course (in chapters 1-9) to your analysis. Make sure to give a substantive explanation of how the philosophers' insights are relevant to the topic you are discussing. Grading Rubric: The following standards are numbered in order of importance for grading. 1. Essay demonstrates an understanding of the material : The student has correctly grasped a philosophical problem or question, has explained it accurately, and on the basis of a substantially correct interpretation of any texts involved. Key terms are used correctly. The essay shows evidence of the student's independent thought , and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Short (one sentence) quotations are used (comprising no more than 10% of the body of the paper), when appropriate, to support the writer's analysis, and an explanation is offered for each quotation. The use of block quotations will result in a severe point deduction. 95 points 2. Essay has clear and coherent argument : There is a clearly stated thesis, and support for this thesis in the body of the paper. Each paragraph contributes to this argument, and follows logically from the paragraph before it. The argument presented is persuasive. The insights of two other philosophers are incorporated into the analysis. 95 points 3. Essay fulfills assigned task : The essay addresses the entire assigned question or topic, elaborating on important ideas in satisfactory depth, but without bringing in anything extraneous or irrelevant. The introduction of the essay focuses and provides clarity for the paper. Important terms are clearly and accurately defined. Each paragraph conveys a coherent, organized thought. Short (one sentence) quotations are occasionally used, when appropriate, to support the writer's analysis, and an explanation is offered for each quotation. No more than 10% of paper is made up of direct quotes. No block quotations. 40 points 4. Essay obeys standards for good persuasive writing : the writer shows that he or she is comfortable using philosophical language, and the prose is clear, not awkward. The structure of the sentences reflects the relationships between/among the ideas discussed. 40 points 5. Essay is technically correct : The essay has been carefully and thoughtfully proofread. The argument is written in complete sentences, with punctuation that does not mislead the reader. There are no mistakes in spelling, grammar, word choice, and punctuation. 30 points

Paper For Above instruction

The assigned task requires crafting a philosophical analysis based on an article of choice, addressing its main argument, supporting evidence, personal agreement or disagreement, and integrating insights from at least two course readings. This task emphasizes understanding, coherence, relevance, persuasive clarity, and technical correctness, culminating in a thoroughly developed essay of approximately 1000 words.

Philosophical writing demands a careful and nuanced approach. The first step involves selecting a compelling article that presents a clear philosophical argument. Once chosen, the writer must distill the author's primary claim, elucidate how this claim is supported—be it through empirical evidence, logical reasoning, or ancillary points—and critically evaluate their stance, indicating agreement or disagreement based on reasoned analysis. Importantly, the essay should incorporate insights from at least two philosophers studied in the course chapters 1-9 to deepen the analysis and explore relevant intersections.

For example, if the article discusses moral obligation, the writer might draw on Kant's notion of duty as a moral necessity and Mill's consequentialist perspective to analyze the author's claim. The integration should demonstrate a clear understanding of these philosophies and how they shed light on the article's themes, providing a richer context for critique or support.

The argument must be structured around a coherent thesis statement, with each paragraph building logically toward the overall conclusion. Supporting points should include quotations—limited to no more than 10% of the paper—and each quote must be explained thoroughly. The writing style should be formal, precise, and accessible, avoiding ambiguity or overly complex sentences that could hinder comprehension.

Attention to technical precision is essential: grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting must be flawless. The paper must serve as a persuasive and insightful philosophical reflection that adheres strictly to the assignment criteria, ultimately demonstrating both critical engagement and scholarly rigor.

References

• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
• Mill, J.S. (1863). Utilitarianism.
• Nietzsche, F. (1887). On the Genealogy of Morality.
• Descartes, R. (1641). Meditations on First Philosophy.
• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice.
• Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics.
• Hume, D. (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature.
• Confucius. (5th century BCE). Analects.
• Socrates. (5th century BCE). Apology.
• Deleuze, G. (1968). Difference and Repetition.