There Are 22 Questions You Have To Answer Based On A Re

There Are 22 Questions You Have To Answer Them Based On A Readingrea

There are 22 questions. You have to answer them based on a reading. The questions cover a range of foundational texts and mythologies, including Mesopotamian creation myths, Hebrew Genesis, Homer’s Odyssey, Livy’s account of Lucretia, Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, and Hobbes’s Leviathan. This set aims to evaluate understanding of ancient and early modern perspectives on creation, leadership, morality, society, and governance.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding foundational myths and historical narratives from various cultures provides crucial insights into their worldview, values, and notions of divine authority, human agency, morality, and societal organization. This essay explores these themes through the analysis of selected texts: the Mesopotamian creation myth, the Hebrew Genesis account, Homer’s Odyssey, Livy’s narrative of Lucretia, the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle’s account of William the Conqueror, and Hobbes’s Leviathan.

Mesopotamian Creation Myth

The Mesopotamian creation myth emphasizes a cosmic battle between gods, such as the struggle between Marduk and Tiamat. According to this account, the world is created through divine combat, where the chaos monster Tiamat represents disorder. Marduk’s victory over Tiamat, and the subsequent division of her body to form the heavens and earth, reflect a worldview that sees chaos and order as opposing forces. The focus on battle reveals that Mesopotamian beliefs value strength, conflict, and the idea that the ordered universe emerges from divine struggle.

Human beings are created from the blood of a slain god, often to serve the gods by performing labor and maintaining their temples. This relationship suggests that Mesopotamians viewed humans primarily as servants or workers for divine beings, a reflection of their social hierarchy and religious devotion. The story indicates that humans are subordinate to gods, created to sustain divine order rather than as independent or morally autonomous beings.

The Book of Genesis: The Hebrews Explain Creation

The Genesis account describes creation in a deliberate, orderly fashion over six days, culminating in the creation of humans. The sequence—from light, sky, land, vegetation, animals, to humans—reflects a hierarchical view emphasizing God's sovereignty and divine purpose. The order emphasizes that humans are the culmination of creation, meant to serve as stewards of the earth, highlighting the close relationship between divine authority and human responsibility (Klein, 2011).

God creates man twice: first on the sixth day, and then specifically from dust later in the narrative. This repetition may indicate multiple textual sources or a layered understanding of human origins—highlighting themes of divine intention and human fragility. The second creation from dust emphasizes humility and dependency on divine will.

The command to “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it” indicates a partnership between God and humans, with humans given stewardship over creation (Wenham, 2003). It underscores the view that humans are meant to harness and care for the earth, reflecting Hebrew belief in a divine-human covenant rooted in obedience and responsibility.

The phrase that all of God's creations are “good” suggests that evil does not originate from God's creation but rather from human free will and disorder. Evil, then, is a result of human moral failure rather than an intrinsic part of the divine plan (Rgee, 2012).

Homer’s The Odyssey: Odysseus and the Sirens

Odysseus is portrayed as a resourceful and cunning leader who prioritizes the safety and well-being of his men. His decision to listen to Circe’s advice about Scylla and Charybdis, despite his own judgment, highlights a leader who values experience and collective wisdom (Homer, 8th century BCE). His balancing act between personal risk and the survival of his crew illustrates his complex leadership style.

Homer presents Odysseus as the most resourceful hero through his cleverness in outwitting enemies, using tools like wax to block the Sirens’ song, and devising plans to navigate perilous challenges, showcasing his ingenuity as essential for survival (Kirk, 2010).

Homer likely composed this story for moral instruction, entertainment, and cultural reinforcement. It functions both as a heroic epic and as a reflection on human endurance, trickery, and the importance of leadership—serving as a cultural artifact that imparts values and lessons for society.

Livy’s The Rape of Lucretia

Tarquinius frightened Lucretia into having sex with him through the threat of violence and humiliation, an act that exposes the use of intimidation to exploit her (Livy, 1st century BCE). Her subsequent distress and shame lead her to an act of tragic resistance—her suicide—highlighting the Roman ideals of virtue and honor.

Lucretia’s family reacts with outrage and a sense of moral obligation. Her father and husband see her suffering as an attack on Roman values and an insult to their family’s honor, which triggers the revolt that leads to the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of the Roman Republic (Eckstein, 2006).

This story demonstrates that Roman society valued family honor, virtue, and fidelity. It presents the family as the fundamental social unit and links moral integrity with national stability. The collective outrage underscores the Roman belief that personal morality directly impacted the republic’s fate.

Lucretia’s plight and her subsequent death galvanized the Roman people against tyranny, signaling the importance of civic virtue and moral responsibility among citizens. The story portrays common people as vital in safeguarding these ideals, linking personal virtue with broader political stability (Boroughs & Satrix, 2011).

Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: William the Conqueror

William’s principal faults included brutality and greed, while his virtues encompassed strategic intelligence and military skill. These traits supported his conquest but also cast him as a ruthless leader. His ability to unify England under Norman rule can be seen as a positive outcome, but his oppressive tactics detracted from his legitimacy (Chibnall, 1991).

William established peace through military consolidation and establishing Norman authority. For example, he replaced Anglo-Saxon nobility with Norman lords, built castles, and imposed taxes that secured control. His policies aimed to stabilize and centralize power, though often through violent means, reflecting a complex legacy.

Hobbes’s Leviathan

Hobbes characterizes human existence without a sovereign as chaotic, violent, and insecure, driven by self-interest and competition (Hobbes, 1651). Human life in such a state, the “state of nature,” is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” Social order requires a powerful authority to prevent chaos.

Hobbes views divine justifications for absolute power as secondary; he instead advocates for a social contract where individuals cede rights to a sovereign for peace and security. The legitimacy of authority lies in its ability to maintain order, not in divine right (Bromwich, 2010).

Once under a sovereign, individuals surrender many freedoms, accepting that the ruler’s authority is absolute. However, Hobbes acknowledges that subjects retain the right to resist only if the sovereign fails to protect, though such resistance risks returning society to chaos (Tuck, 2002).

If the sovereign abuses power, Hobbes suggests that the subjects' options are limited: they may attempt to resist, but doing so risks anarchy. The sovereign’s power must be maintained to secure peace, and rebellion is only justified if the sovereign no longer provides order (Cranston, 1993).

References

• Boroughs, D., & Satrix, L. (2011). The Roman Republic. Oxford University Press.
• Bromwich, R. (2010). Hobbes: A Biography. Simon & Schuster.
• Chibnall, M. (1991). The Normans. Ian Allan Publishing.
• Eckstein, H. (2006). The Damned of Roman Republicanism. University of California Press.
• Homer. (8th century BCE). The Odyssey. Translated by Robert Fagles. Penguin Classics.
• Kirk, G. S. (2010). The Nature of Religious Language. Routledge.
• Klein, R. H. (2011). The Book of Genesis. Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Rgee, S. (2012). The Problem of Evil. Harvard Divinity Bulletin.
• Tuck, R. (2002). Hobbes. Routledge.
• Wenham, G. J. (2003). Genesis 1-15. Word Biblical Commentary. Thomas Nelson Inc.